- Research Article
- Open access
- Published:

# Stability of a Jensen Type Logarithmic Functional Equation on Restricted Domains and Its Asymptotic Behaviors

*Advances in Difference Equations*
**volumeÂ 2010**, ArticleÂ number:Â 432796 (2010)

## Abstract

Let be the set of positive real numbers, a Banach space, and , with . We prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the Jensen type logarithmic functional inequality in restricted domains of the form for fixed with or and . As consequences of the results we obtain asymptotic behaviors of the inequality as .

## 1. Introduction

The stability problems of functional equations have been originated by Ulam in 1940 (see [1]). One of the first assertions to be obtained is the following result, essentially due to Hyers [2], that gives an answer for the question of Ulam.

Theorem 1.1.

Suppose that is an additive semigroup, is a Banach space, , and satisfies the inequality

for all . Then there exists a unique function satisfying

for which

for all .

In 1950-1951 this result was generalized by the authors Aoki [3] and Bourgin [4, 5]. Unfortunately, no results appeared until 1978 when Th. M. Rassias generalized the Hyers' result to a new approximately linear mappings [6]. Following the Rassias' result, a great number of the papers on the subject have been published concerning numerous functional equations in various directions [6â€“16]. For more precise descriptions of the Hyers-Ulam stability and related results, we refer the reader to the paper of Moszner [17]. Among the results, the stability problem in a restricted domain was investigated by Skof, who proved the stability problem of the inequality (1.1) in a restricted domain [16]. Developing this result, Jung considered the stability problems in restricted domains for the Jensen functional equation [11] and Jensen type functional equations [14]. The results can be summarized as follows: let and be a real normed space and a real Banach space, respectively. For fixed , if satisfies the functional inequalities (such as that of Cauchy, Jensen and Jensen type, etc.) for all with , the inequalities hold for all . We also refer the reader to [18â€“26] for some interesting results on functional equations and their Hyers-Ulam stabilities in restricted conditions.

Throughout this paper, we denote by the set of positive real numbers, a Banach space, , and with . We prove the Hyers-Ulam stability of the Jensen type logarithmic functional inequality

in the restricted domains of the form for fixed with or , and . As a result, we prove that if the inequality (1.4) holds for all , there exists a unique function satisfying

for which

for all if ,

for all if , and

for all if . As a consequence of the result we obtain the stability of the inequality

in the restricted domains of the form for fixed with or , and . Also we obtain asymptotic behaviors of the inequalities (1.4) and (1.9) as and , respectively.

## 2. Hyers-Ulam Stability in Restricted Domains

We call the functions satisfying (1.5)*logarithmic functions*. As a direct consequence of Theorem 1.1, we obtain the stability of the logarithmic functional equation, viewing as a multiplicative group (see also the result of Forti [9]).

Theorem A.

Suppose that , , and

for all . Then there exists a unique logarithmic function satisfying

for all .

We first consider the usual logarithmic functional inequality (2.1) in the restricted domains .

Theorem 2.1.

Let , with or . Suppose that satisfies

for all , with . Then there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all .

Proof.

From the symmetry of the inequality we may assume that . For given , choose a such that , , and . Then we have

This completes the proof.

Now we consider the Hyers-Ulam stability of the Jensen type logarithmic functional inequality (1.4) in the restricted domains .

Theorem 2.2.

Let . Suppose that satisfies

for all , with . Then there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all .

Proof.

Replacing by , by in (2.6) we have

for all , with .

For given , choose a such that , , , and . Replacing by , by ; by , by ; by , by ; by , by in (2.8) we have

Now by Theorem A, there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all . This completes the proof.

As a matter of fact, we obtain that in Theorem 2.2 provided that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number.

Theorem 2.3.

Let , , . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies

for all , with . Then one has

for all .

Proof.

We prove (2.12) only for the case that and or is a rational number since the other case is similarly proved. From (2.7) and (2.11), using the triangle inequality we have

for all , with , where . If , putting in (2.13) we have

for all , with . It is easy to see that for all and all rational numbers . Thus if is a rational number, it follows from (2.14) that

for all , with . If there exists such that , we can choose a rational number such that and (it is realized when is large if , and when is large if ). Now we have

Thus it follows that . If is a rational number, it follows from (2.14) that

for all , with , which implies

for all , with . Similarly, using (2.18) we can show that . If , choosing such that , putting in (2.13) and using the triangle inequality we have

for all . Similarly, using (2.19) we can show that . Thus the inequality (2.12) follows from (2.7). This completes the proof.

Theorem 2.4.

Let with or . Suppose that satisfies

for all , with . Then there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all if , and

for all if .

Proof.

Assume that . For given , choose a such that , , and . Replacing by , by ; by , by ; by , by ; by 1, by in (2.20) we have

Dividing (2.23) by and using Theorem A, we obtain that there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all . Assume that . For given , choose a such that and . Replacing by , by ; by , by ; by , by ; by 1, by in (2.20) we have

Dividing (2.25) by and using Theorem A, we obtain that there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all . This completes the proof.

From Theorem 2.4, using the same approach as in the proof of Theorem 2.3 we have the following.

Theorem 2.5.

Let , with or . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies

for all , with . Then one has

for all if , and

for all if .

We call *an additive function* provided that

for all . Using Theorem 2.2 we have the following.

Corollary 2.6 (see [22]).

Let , with . Suppose that satisfies

for all , with . Then there exists a unique additive function such that

for all .

Proof.

Replacing by , by in (2.31) and setting we have

for all , with . Using Theorem 2.2, we have

for all , which implies

for all . Letting we get the result.

Using Theorem 2.3, we have the following.

Corollary 2.7.

Let , with . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies

for all , with . Then one has

for all .

Using Theorem 2.4, we have the following.

Corollary 2.8.

Let , with or . Suppose that satisfies

for all , with . Then there exists a unique additive function such that

for all if , and

for all if .

Using Theorem 2.5, we have the following.

Corollary 2.9.

Let , with or . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies

for all , with . Then one has

for all if , and

for all if .

## 3. Asymptotic Behavior of the Inequality

In this section, we consider asymptotic behaviors of the inequalities (1.4) and (2.1).

Theorem 3.1.

Let satisfy one of the conditions; , . Suppose that satisfies the asymptotic condition

as . Then is a logarithmic function.

Proof.

By the condition (3.1), for each , there exists such that

for all , with . By Theorem 2.1, there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all . From (3.4) we have

for all and all positive integers . Now, the inequality (3.4) implies . Indeed, for all and rational numbers we have

Letting in (3.5), we have . Thus, letting in (3.3), we get the result.

Theorem 3.2.

Let satisfy one of the conditions; , , . Suppose that satisfies the asymptotic condition

as . Then there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

for all .

Proof.

By the condition (3.6), for each , there exists such that

for all , with . By Theorems 2.2 and 2.4, there exists a unique logarithmic function such that

if ,

if , and

if . For all cases (3.9), (3.10), and (3.11), there exists such that

for all and all positive integers . Now as in the proof of Theorem 3.1, it follows from (3.12) that for all . Letting in (3.9), (3.10), and (3.11) we get the result.

Similarly using Theorems 2.3 and 2.5, we have the following.

Theorem 3.3.

Let satisfy one of the conditions; , , . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies the asymptotic condition

as . Then is a constant function.

Using Corollaries 2.6 and 2.8 we have the following.

Corollary 3.4.

Let , satisfy one of the conditions , , or . Suppose that satisfies

as . Then there exists a unique additive function such that

for all .

Using Corollaries 2.7 and 2.9 we have the following.

Corollary 3.5.

Let , satisfy one of the conditions , , or . Suppose that and or is a rational number, or and or is a rational number, and satisfies

as . Then is a constant function.

## References

Ulam SM:

*A Collection of Mathematical Problems*. Interscience, New York, NY, USA; 1960.Hyers DH:

**On the stability of the linear functional equation.***Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*1941,**27:**222â€“224. 10.1073/pnas.27.4.222Aoki T:

**On the stability of the linear transformation in Banach spaces.***Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan*1950,**2:**64â€“66. 10.2969/jmsj/00210064Bourgin DG:

**Multiplicative transformations.***Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America*1950,**36:**564â€“570. 10.1073/pnas.36.10.564Bourgin DG:

**Classes of transformations and bordering transformations.***Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society*1951,**57:**223â€“237. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1951-09511-7Rassias TM:

**On the stability of the linear mapping in Banach spaces.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1978,**72**(2):297â€“300. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1978-0507327-1Chung J:

**A distributional version of functional equations and their stabilities.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2005,**62**(6):1037â€“1051. 10.1016/j.na.2005.04.016Chung J:

**Stability of approximately quadratic Schwartz distributions.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2007,**67**(1):175â€“186. 10.1016/j.na.2006.05.005Forti GL:

**The stability of homomorphisms and amenability, with applications to functional equations.***Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der UniversitÃ¤t Hamburg*1987,**57:**215â€“226. 10.1007/BF02941612Hyers DH, Isac G, Rassias TM:

*Stability of Functional Equations in Several Variables, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications*.*Volume 34*. BirkhÃ¤user, Boston, Mass, USA; 1998:vi+313.Jung S-M:

**Hyers-Ulam-Rassias stability of Jensen's equation and its application.***Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*1998,**126**(11):3137â€“3143. 10.1090/S0002-9939-98-04680-2Jun K-W, Kim H-M:

**Stability problem for Jensen-type functional equations of cubic mappings.***Acta Mathematica Sinica*2006,**22**(6):1781â€“1788. 10.1007/s10114-005-0736-9Kim GH, Lee YW:

**Boundedness of approximate trigonometric functional equations.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2009,**31**(4):439â€“443. 10.1016/j.aml.2008.06.013Rassias JM:

**On the Ulam stability of mixed type mappings on restricted domains.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2002,**276**(2):747â€“762. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00439-0Rassias JM, Rassias MJ:

**On the Ulam stability of Jensen and Jensen type mappings on restricted domains.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2003,**281**(2):516â€“524. 10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00136-7Skof F:

**Sull'approssimazione delle applicazioni localmente****-additive.***Atti della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino. Classe di Scienze Fisiche, Matematiche e Naturali*1983,**117:**377â€“389.Moszner Z:

**On the stability of functional equations.***Aequationes Mathematicae*2009,**77**(1â€“2):33â€“88. 10.1007/s00010-008-2945-7Batko B:

**Stability of an alternative functional equation.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**339**(1):303â€“311. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.07.001Batko B:

**On approximation of approximate solutions of Dhombres' equation.***Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2008,**340**(1):424â€“432. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.08.009BrzdÄ™k J:

**On the quotient stability of a family of functional equations.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**71**(10):4396â€“4404. 10.1016/j.na.2009.02.123BrzdÄ™k J:

**On a method of proving the Hyers-Ulam stability of functional equations on restricted domains.***The Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*2009,**6**(1):1â€“10.BrzdÄ™k J:

**On stability of a family of functional equations.***Acta Mathematica Hungarica*2010,**128**(1â€“2):139â€“149. 10.1007/s10474-010-9169-8BrzdÄ™k J, Sikorska J:

**A conditional exponential functional equation and its stability.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2010,**72**(6):2923â€“2934. 10.1016/j.na.2009.11.036Sikorska J:

**On two conditional Pexider functional equations and their stabilities.***Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications*2009,**70**(7):2673â€“2684. 10.1016/j.na.2008.03.054Sikorska J:

**On a Pexiderized conditional exponential functional equation.***Acta Mathematica Hungarica*2009,**125**(3):287â€“299. 10.1007/s10474-009-9019-8Sikorska J:

**Exponential functional equation on spheres.***Applied Mathematics Letters*2010,**23**(2):156â€“160. 10.1016/j.aml.2009.09.004

## Acknowledgments

The author expresses his sincere gratitude to a referee of the paper for many useful comments and introducing the interesting related recent results including the papers [17â€“26]. This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (no. 2010-0016963).

## Author information

### Authors and Affiliations

### Corresponding author

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

## About this article

### Cite this article

Chung, JY. Stability of a Jensen Type Logarithmic Functional Equation on Restricted Domains and Its Asymptotic Behaviors.
*Adv Differ Equ* **2010**, 432796 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/432796

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published:

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/432796