 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Stability of abstract dynamic equations on time scales
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2012, Article number: 143 (2012)
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate many types of stability, like uniform stability, asymptotic stability, uniform asymptotic stability, global stability, global asymptotic stability, exponential stability, uniform exponential stability, of the homogeneous firstorder linear dynamic equations of the form
where A is the generator of a {C}_{0}semigroup \{T(t):t\in \mathbb{T}\}\subset L(X), the space of all bounded linear operators from a Banach space X into itself. Here, \mathbb{T}\subseteq {\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0} is a time scale which is an additive semigroup with the property that ab\in \mathbb{T} for any a,b\in \mathbb{T} such that a>b. Finally, we give an illustrative example for a nonregressive homogeneous firstorder linear dynamic equation and we investigate its stability.
1 Introduction and preliminaries
The history of asymptotic stability of dynamic equations on a time scale goes back to Aulbach and Hilger [3]. For a real scalar dynamic equation, stability and instability results were obtained by Gard and Hoffacker [12]. Pötzche [20] provides sufficient conditions for the uniform exponential stability in Banach spaces, as well as spectral stability conditions for timevarying systems on time scales. Doan, Kalauch, and Siegmund [10] established a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of uniform exponential stability and characterized the uniform exponential stability of a system by the spectrum of its matrix. Properties of exponential stability of a time varying dynamic equation on a time scale have been also investigated recently by Bohner and Martynyuk [7], DaCunha [9], Du and Tien [11], Hoffacker and Tisdell [16], Martynyuk [17], and Peterson and Raffoul [19].
The theory of dynamic equations on time scales was introduced by Stefan Hilger in 1988 [14], in order to unify continuous and discrete calculus [4, 15]. A time scale \mathbb{T} is a nonempty closed subset of \mathbb{R}. The forward jump operator \sigma :\mathbb{T}\u27f6\mathbb{T} is defined by \sigma (t)=inf\{s\in \mathbb{T}:s>t\} (supplemented by inf\mathrm{\varnothing}=sup\mathbb{T}) and the backward jump operator \rho :\mathbb{T}\u27f6\mathbb{T} is defined by \rho (t)=sup\{s\in \mathbb{T}:s<t\} (supplemented by sup\mathrm{\varnothing}=inf\mathbb{T}). The graininess function \mu :\mathbb{T}\u27f6{\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0} is given by \mu (t)=\sigma (t)t. A point t\in \mathbb{T} is said to be rightdense if \sigma (t)=t, rightscattered if \sigma (t)>t, leftdense if \rho (t)=t, leftscattered if \rho (t)<t, isolated if \rho (t)<t<\sigma (t), and dense if \rho (t)=t=\sigma (t). A time scale \mathbb{T} is said to be discrete if t is leftscattered and rightscattered for all t\in \mathbb{T}, and it is called continuous if t is rightdense and leftdense at the same time for all t\in \mathbb{T}. Suppose that \mathbb{T} has the topology inherited from the standard topology on \mathbb{R}. We define the time scale interval [a,b]:=[a,b]\cap \mathbb{T}. Open intervals and open neighborhoods are defined similarly. A set we need to consider is {\mathbb{T}}^{k} which is defined as {\mathbb{T}}^{k}=\mathbb{T}\mathrm{\setminus}\{M\} if \mathbb{T} has a leftscattered maximum M, and {\mathbb{T}}^{k}=\mathbb{T} otherwise. A function f:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X is called right dense continuous, or just rdcontinuous, if

(i)
f is continuous at every rightdense point t\in \mathbb{T};

(ii)
{lim}_{s\u27f6{t}^{}}f(s) exists (finite) for every leftdense point t\in \mathbb{T}.
The set of rdcontinuous functions f:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X will be denoted by {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}={C}_{\mathrm{rd}}(\mathbb{T})={C}_{\mathrm{rd}}(\mathbb{T},X).
A function f:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X is called delta differentiable (\text{or simply differentiable}) at t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k} provided there exists an α such that for every \u03f5>0 there is a neighborhood U of t with
In this case, we denote the α by {f}^{\mathrm{\Delta}}(t); and if f is differentiable for every t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k}, then f is said to be differentiable on \mathbb{T}. If f is differentiable at t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k}, then it is easy to see that
A function F:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X is called an antiderivative of f:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X if {F}^{\mathrm{\Delta}}(t)=f(t), t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k}. The Cauchy integral is defined by
where F is an antiderivative of f. Every rdcontinuous function f:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X has an antiderivative and F(t)={\int}_{s}^{t}f(\tau )\mathrm{\Delta}\tau is an antiderivative of f, i.e., {F}^{\mathrm{\Delta}}(t)=f(t), t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k}. Equations which include Δderivatives are called dynamic equations. We refer the reader to the very interesting monographs of Bohner and Peterson [5, 6].
Definition 1.1 A mapping A:\mathbb{T}\u27f6L(X) is called regressive if I+\mu (t)A(t) is invertible for every t\in \mathbb{T}, and we say that
is regressive if A is regressive. We say that a real valued function p(t) on \mathbb{T} is regressive (resp. positively regressive) if 1+\mu (t)p(t)\ne 0 (resp. 1+\mu (t)p(t)>0), t\in \mathbb{T}. The family of all regressive functions (resp. positively regressive functions) is denoted by \mathcal{R} (resp. {\mathcal{R}}^{+}).
It is well known that if A\in B{C}_{\mathrm{rd}}\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T},L(X)), the space of all right dense continuous and regressive bounded functions from \mathbb{T} to L(X), then the initial value problem (IVP)
has the unique solution
Here, {e}_{A}(t,s) is the exponential operator function. For more details, see [2]. When X=\mathbb{R} and A(t)=p(t) is a real valued function, Eq. (1.1) yields
whose solution has the closed form
where
and Logz=logz+iargz, \pi <argz\le \pi is the principal logarithm function. It is evident that when p(\tau )\ge 0, \tau \in \mathbb{T}, then
It can be seen that for \lambda >0 with \lambda \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+}, the following claim is true
Indeed, by taking p(\tau )=\lambda in Eqs. (1.5) and (1.6), we have
This implies that the claim is true.
In the sequel, we denote by \mathbb{T}\subseteq {\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0} for a time scale which is an additive semigroup with the property that ab\in \mathbb{T} for any a,b\in \mathbb{T} such that a>b. In this case, \mathbb{T} is called a semigroup time scale. We assume X is a Banach space. Finally, we assume that T=\{T(t):t\in \mathbb{T}\}\subset L(X) is a {C}_{0}semigroup on \mathbb{T}, that is, it satisfies

(i)
T(t+s)=T(t)T(s) for every t,s\in \mathbb{T} (the semigroup property).

(ii)
T(0)=I (I is the identity operator on X).

(iii)
{lim}_{t\u27f6{0}^{+}}T(t)x=x (i.e., T(\cdot )x:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X is continuous at 0) for each x\in X.
If in addition {lim}_{t\u27f6{0}^{+}}\parallel T(t)I\parallel =0, then T is called a uniformly continuous semigroup. A linear operator A is called the generator [1] of a {C}_{0}semigroup T if
where the domain D(A) of A is the set of all x\in X for which the above limit exists uniformly in t. Clearly, when \mathbb{T}={\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0}, the concept of the generator defined by relation (1.10) coincides with the classical definition by Hille. See [13].
In Section 2 of this paper we present some results from [1] that we need in our study. One of them is that an abstract Cauchy problem
has the unique solution
when A is the generator of the {C}_{0}semigroup T. When \mathbb{T}={\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0}, we get the classical existence and uniqueness theorem of the abstract Cauchy problem (1.11); see [21]. The other results include some properties of T and its generator A, which we use in the subsequent sections. The solution x(t)=x(t,\tau ,{x}_{\tau}) is a function of the variables t, τ and the initial value {x}_{\tau}. Generally, we consider τ and {x}_{\tau} as parameters. Therefore, when we investigate the asymptotic behavior of x(t,\tau ,{x}_{\tau}) with respect to \mathbb{T}, we must investigate whether or not the asymptotic behavior uniformly depends on τ or {x}_{\tau}. Accordingly, there are many types of stability which we give in Section 3.
S. K. Choi, D. M. Im, and N. Koo in [8], Theorem 3.5] proved that the stability of the time variant abstract Cauchy problem
where A\in {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T},{M}_{n}(\mathbb{R})), n\in \mathbb{N} and {M}_{n}(\mathbb{R}) is the family of all n\times n real matrices is equivalent to the boundedness of all its solutions. DaCunha in [9] defined the concepts of uniform stability and uniform exponential stability. These two concepts involve the boundedness of the solutions of the regressive time varying linear dynamic Eq. (1.12). He established a characterization of uniform stability and uniform exponential stability in terms of the transition matrix for system (1.12). Also, he illustrated the relationship between the uniform asymptotic stability and the uniform exponential stability.
In Section 4, we extend these results for the case where A is the generator of T and we prove that the concepts of stability and uniform stability are same.
Sections 5 and 6 are devoted to establishing characterizations for many other types of stability, like asymptotic stability, uniform asymptotic stability, global asymptotic stability, exponential stability, and uniform exponential stability for the abstract Cauchy problem (1.11).
We end this paper with a new illustrative example including nonregressive dynamic equation and we investigate its stability.
2 The existence and uniqueness of solutions of dynamic equations
Our aim in this section is to prove that the first order initial value problem
has the unique solution
when A is the generator of a {C}_{0}semigroup T=\{T(t):t\in \mathbb{T}\}.
At first, we establish some properties of T and its generator A which we use to arrive at our aim.
Theorem 2.1 For x\in X, the following statements are true:

1.
For t\in \mathbb{T},
\underset{s\u27f6t}{lim}\frac{1}{s\sigma (t)}{\int}_{\sigma (t)}^{s}T(\tau )x\mathrm{\Delta}\tau =\underset{h\u27f60}{lim}\frac{1}{h\mu (t)}{\int}_{\mu (t)+t}^{h+t}T(\tau )x\mathrm{\Delta}\tau(2.2)
and

2.
For t\in \mathbb{T},
{\int}_{0}^{t}T(\tau )x\mathrm{\Delta}\tau \in D(A),
and
Proof 1. Set f(t)={\int}_{0}^{t}T(\tau )x\mathrm{\Delta}\tau. Then
Also, we have
and
where \varphi (u)={\int}_{t}^{u}T(st)x\mathrm{\Delta}s.

2.
Let h>0 be a number in \mathbb{T}. We have
\begin{array}{rl}A{\int}_{0}^{t}T(s)x\mathrm{\Delta}s& =\underset{h\u27f6{0}^{+}}{lim}\frac{1}{\mu (t)h}[{\int}_{0}^{t}T(\mu (t)+s)x\mathrm{\Delta}s{\int}_{0}^{t}T(h+s)x\mathrm{\Delta}s]\\ =\underset{h\u27f6{0}^{+}}{lim}\frac{1}{\mu (t)h}[{\int}_{t+h}^{\mu (t)+t}T(s)x\mathrm{\Delta}s+{\int}_{\mu (t)}^{h}T(s)x\mathrm{\Delta}s]\\ =T(t)xx\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{by Eqs. (2.3), (2.4).}\end{array}
□
Theorem 2.2 For x\in D(A), the following statements are true:

1.
For t\in \mathbb{T}, x(t)=T(t)x\in D(A) and
{x}^{\mathrm{\Delta}}(t)=AT(t)x=T(t)Ax.(2.6) 
2.
For t,s\in \mathbb{T}, we have
T(t)xT(s)x={\int}_{s}^{t}T(\tau )Ax\mathrm{\Delta}\tau(2.7)
and
Proof 1. Let x\in D(A). It is evident that T(t)x\in D(A), t\in \mathbb{T}.
Now, we show that x(t)=T(t)x solves the initial value problem
We have either \mu (t)=0 or \mu (t)>0. The case \mu (t)=0 implies
On the other hand,
When \mu (t)>0, we obtain
2. Relations (2.7) and (2.8) can be obtained by integrating both sides of Eq. (2.6) from s to t. Relation (2.9) follows from Eqs. (2.5) and (2.7). □
Corollary 2.3 If A is the generator of a {C}_{0}semigroup T on \mathbb{T}, then D(A) is dense in X and A is a closed linear operator.
Proof For every x\in X and fixed t\in \mathbb{T}, set
Theorem 2.1 implies that
By the same theorem, {x}_{h}\u27f6x as h\u27f60. So \overline{D(A)}, the closure of D(A), is equal to X. The linearity of A is evident.
To prove its closeness, let {x}_{n}\in D(A), {x}_{n}\u27f6x and A{x}_{n}\u27f6y as n\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}. In view of equality (2.7), we obtain
The integrand on the righthand side of (2.10) converges to T(s)y uniformly on bounded intervals. Consequently, letting n\u27f6\mathrm{\infty} in (2.10), we get
Dividing Eq. (2.11) by h\mu (t), h>0 and letting h\u27f60, we see, using identity (2.4), that x\in D(A) and Ax=y. □
Theorem 2.4 Equation (2.1) has the unique solution
Proof The existence of the solution x(t)=T(t)x follows by Theorem 2.2. To prove the uniqueness, assume that V(t) is another solution. Consider the function
where {H}_{t}(s)=T(ts). We have
On the other hand, we have
from which we obtain that {G}^{\mathrm{\Delta}}(s)=0 on [0,t[. Then G(t)=G(0), i.e. V(t)=T(t)V(0)=T(t)x. □
3 Types of stability
In this section, the definitions of the various types of stability for dynamic equations of the form
are presented, where F\in {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}(\mathbb{T}\times X,X) and {x}^{\mathrm{\Delta}} is the delta derivative of x:\mathbb{T}\u27f6X with respect to t\in {\mathbb{T}}^{k}. See [8, 18].
Definition 3.1 Equation (3.1) is said to be stable if, for every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T} and for every \u03f5>0, there exists a \delta =\delta (\u03f5,{t}_{0})>0 such that, for any two solutions x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) and \overline{x}(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{\overline{x}}_{0}) of Eq. (3.1), the inequality \parallel {x}_{0}{\overline{x}}_{0}\parallel <\delta implies \parallel x(t)\overline{x}(t)\parallel <\u03f5, for all t\ge {t}_{0}, t\in \mathbb{T}.
Definition 3.2 Equation (3.1) is said to be uniformly stable if, for each \u03f5>0, there exists a \delta =\delta (\u03f5)>0 independent on any initial point {t}_{0} such that, for any two solutions x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) and \overline{x}(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{\overline{x}}_{0}) of Eq. (3.1), the inequality \parallel {x}_{0}{\overline{x}}_{0}\parallel <\delta implies \parallel x(t)\overline{x}(t)\parallel <\u03f5, for all t\ge {t}_{0}, t\in \mathbb{T}.
Definition 3.3 Equation (3.1) is said to be asymptotically stable if it is stable and for every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there exists a \delta =\delta ({t}_{0})>0 such that, the inequality \parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\delta implies {lim}_{t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}}\parallel x(t)\parallel =0.
Definition 3.4 Equation (3.1) is said to be uniformly asymptotically stable if it is uniformly stable and there exists a \delta >0 such that for every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T} the inequality \parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\delta implies {lim}_{t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}}\parallel x(t)\parallel =0, t\in \mathbb{T}.
Definition 3.5 Equation (3.1) is said to be globally asymptotically stable if it is stable and for any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of Eq. (3.1), we have {lim}_{t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}}\parallel x(t)\parallel =0.
Definition 3.6 Equation (3.1) is said to be exponentially stable if there exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} such that for every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there is \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})\ge 1 such that, for any two solutions x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) and \overline{x}(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{\overline{x}}_{0}) of Eq. (3.1), we have \parallel x(t)\overline{x}(t)\parallel \le \gamma \parallel {x}_{0}{\overline{x}}_{0}\parallel {e}_{\alpha}(t,{t}_{0}), for all t\ge {t}_{0}, t\in \mathbb{T}.
Definition 3.7 Equation (3.1) is said to be uniformly exponentially stable if there exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} and there is \gamma \ge 1 independent on any initial point {t}_{0} such that, for any two solutions x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) and \overline{x}(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{\overline{x}}_{0}) of Eq. (3.1), we have \parallel x(t)\overline{x}(t)\parallel \le \gamma \parallel {x}_{0}{\overline{x}}_{0}\parallel {e}_{\alpha}(t,{t}_{0}), for all t\ge {t}_{0}, t\in \mathbb{T}.
4 Characterization of stability and uniformly stability
In this section, we obtain some results concerning characterizations of stability and uniform stability of linear dynamic equations of the form
where A is the generator of T. The initial value problem CP(0) has the unique solution
In the following two lemmas, by linearity of CP(0), we get an equivalent definition of stability and uniform stability of CP(0).
Lemma 4.1 The following statements are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is stable;

(ii)
For every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T} and for every \u03f5>0, there exists \delta =\delta (\u03f5,{t}_{0}) such that for any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of CP(0), we have
\parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\delta \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\u27f9\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\parallel x(t)\parallel <\u03f5.
Lemma 4.2 The following statements are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is uniformly stable;

(ii)
For every \u03f5>0 there exists \delta =\delta (\u03f5) such that for any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of CP(0), we have
\parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\delta \phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\u27f9\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\parallel x(t)\parallel <\u03f5.
S. K. Choi, D. M. Im, and N. Koo in [8], Theorem 3.5] proved that the stability of (1.12) is equivalent to the boundedness of all its solutions when A\in {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T},{M}_{n}(\mathbb{R})), n\in \mathbb{N} where {M}_{n}(\mathbb{R}) is the family of all n\times n real matrices. Also, DaCunha in [9] proved that the uniform stability of (1.12) is equivalent to the uniform boundedness of all its solutions with respect to the initial point {t}_{0}, when A\in {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T},{M}_{n}(\mathbb{R})).
In the following theorem, we extend these results for the case where A is the generator of a {C}_{0}semigroup T and we prove that the concepts of stability and uniform stability are the same.
Theorem 4.3 The following statements are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is stable.

(ii)
\{T(t):t\in \mathbb{T}\} is bounded.

(iii)
CP(0) is uniformly stable.
Proof (i) ⟹ (ii) Assume CP(0) is stable. Let {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}. Fix \u03f5=1. There exists \delta >0 such that for any solution x(t)=T(t{t}_{0}){x}_{0}, where {x}_{0}\in D(A), we have
Let 0\ne {y}_{0}\in D(A). Take {x}_{0}=\frac{\delta {y}_{0}}{2\parallel {y}_{0}\parallel}. Since \parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\delta, then
i.e.
The density of D(A) in X, by Corollary 2.3, implies that
Thus, for every x\in X, \{\parallel T(t{t}_{0})x\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T},t\ge {t}_{0}\} is bounded. By the uniform boundedness theorem [22], \{\parallel T(t)\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T}\} is bounded.

(ii)
⟹ (iii) Assume that there is M>0 such that \parallel T(t)\parallel \le M, t\in \mathbb{T}. Clearly, condition (ii) of Lemma 4.2 holds, because for \u03f5>0, choose \delta =\u03f5/M. □
5 A characterization of global asymptotic stability
In the following result, we establish necessary and sufficient conditions for CP(0) to be globally asymptotically stable.
Theorem 5.1 The following statement are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is asymptotically stable;

(ii)
{lim}_{t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}}\parallel T(t)x\parallel =0, for every x\in X;

(iii)
CP(0) is globally asymptotically stable;

(iv)
CP(0) is uniformly asymptotically stable.
Proof (i) ⟹ (ii) Suppose that CP(0) is asymptotically stable. Let {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}. There exists \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})>0 such that any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of CP(0) with initial value {x}_{0}\in D(A), vanishes at ∞ whenever \parallel {x}_{0}\parallel <\gamma. Fix 0\ne x\in D(A). Then
Hence,
Consequently, we obtain
By the boundedness of \{T(t):t\in \mathbb{T}\} and the density of D(A) in X, we deduce that

(ii)
⟹ (iii) Condition (ii) implies that \{\parallel T(t)x\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T}\} is bounded for every x\in X. The uniform boundedness theorem insures the boundedness of \{\parallel T(t)\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T}\}. Consequently, CP(0) is stable, and by our assumption, CP(0) is globally asymptotically stable.

(iii)
⟹ (iv) Condition (iii) implies that \{\parallel T(t)x\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T}\} is bounded for every x\in X. Again the uniform boundedness theorem guarantees the boundedness of \{\parallel T(t)\parallel :t\in \mathbb{T}\}. Consequently, CP(0) is uniformly stable by Theorem 4.3, and by our assumption, CP(0) is uniformly asymptotically stable. □
6 A characterization of exponential stability and uniform exponential stability
We need the following lemmas to establish a characterization of the exponential stability of CP(0). Their proofs are straightforward and will be omitted.
Lemma 6.1 CP(0) is exponentially stable if and only if there exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} such that for any {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there exists \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})\ge 1 such that for any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of CP(0) with initial value {x}_{0}\in D(A) we have
Lemma 6.2 CP(0) is uniformly exponentially stable if and only if there exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} and there exists \gamma \ge 1 such that for any {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, and any solution x(t)=x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0}) of CP(0) with initial value {x}_{0}\in D(A) we have
In the following two theorems, we extend the results of DaCunha [9], Theorem 2.2] when A\in {C}_{\mathrm{rd}}\mathcal{R}(\mathbb{T},{M}_{n}(\mathbb{R})) to the case where A is the generator of T.
Theorem 6.3 The following statements are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is exponentially stable;

(ii)
There exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} such that for any {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there exists \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})\ge 1 such that
\parallel T(t)\parallel \le \gamma {e}_{\alpha}(t+{t}_{0},{t}_{0}),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}t\in \mathbb{T}.
Proof (i) ⟹ (ii) Let CP(0) be exponentially stable. Then there is \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} such that for any {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there exists \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})\ge 1 such that for any solution x(t)=T(t{t}_{0}){x}_{0} of CP(0) with initial value {x}_{0}\in D(A), we have
Fix {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, and let 0\ne x\in D(A). Then
Using D(A) is dense in X and Corollary 2.3, we obtain
This implies that
(ii) ⟹ (i) Assume there exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} such that for every {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T}, there exists \gamma =\gamma ({t}_{0})\ge 1 such that
Let x(t,{t}_{0},{x}_{0})=T(t{t}_{0}){x}_{0} be any solution of CP(0) with initial value {x}_{0}. Then
□
By same way as in the proof of Theorem 6.3, we can obtain the following result.
Theorem 6.4 The following statements are equivalent:

(i)
CP(0) is uniformly exponentially stable;

(ii)
There exists \alpha >0 with \alpha \in {\mathcal{R}}^{+} and there exists \gamma \ge 1 such that for any {t}_{0}\in \mathbb{T},
\parallel T(t)\parallel \le \gamma {e}_{\alpha}(t+{t}_{0},{t}_{0}),\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}t\in \mathbb{T}.
From Theorem 5.1 (Theorem 6.4), Lemma 6.1 (Lemma 6.2), and relation (1.7), we get the following result.
Corollary 6.5 If CP(0) is (uniformly) exponentially stable, then CP(0) is (uniformly) asymptotically stable.
7 Example
Choi in [8] gave an example to illustrate many types of stability. He considered the linear dynamic system
where \mathbb{T}\subset {\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0} is a time scale and A=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 0\\ 0& 2\end{array}\right) and investigated some types of stability of Eq. (7.1) when A is regressive, i.e., \mu (t)\ne \frac{1}{2} for all t\in \mathbb{T}. In this case the equation has the unique solution x(t)={e}_{A}(t,0){x}_{0}, where {e}_{A}(t,0) is the matrix exponential function. It is given by
We see that the generalized exponential function {e}_{2}(t,0) is given by
and
The following stability results [8] for (7.1) were obtained in different cases of \mathbb{T}.

(1)
If \mathbb{T}={\mathbb{R}}^{\ge 0}, then (7.1) is uniformly stable, exponentially stable and asymptotically stable, since \parallel {e}_{A}(t,0)\parallel ={e}^{2t}\u27f60 as t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}.

(2)
If \mathbb{T}={\mathbb{Z}}^{\ge 0}, then (7.1) is uniformly stable but not asymptotically stable, since \parallel {e}_{A}(t,0)\parallel =1.

(3)
If \mathbb{T}=h{\mathbb{Z}}^{\ge 0} with 0<h<1 and h\ne \frac{1}{2}, then (7.1) is not asymptotically stable. However, {e}_{2}(t,0) goes to zero as t\u27f6\mathrm{\infty}.

(4)
If \mathbb{T}=h{\mathbb{Z}}^{\ge 0} with h>1, then (7.1) is not asymptotically stable.
Now we consider the time scale \mathbb{T}=\{\frac{n}{2}:n\in {\mathbb{Z}}^{\ge 0}\} with the graininess function \mu (t)=1/2, t\in \mathbb{T}. So A is nonregressive and the matrix exponential function {e}_{A}(t,0) does not exist. On the other hand, A is the generator of the {C}_{0}semigroup
Indeed, for x\in {\mathbb{R}}^{2}, we have
Then
Consequently, \parallel T(t)\parallel =1, t\in \mathbb{T} which implies that Eq. (7.1) is uniformly stable but is not asymptotically stable.
References
Hamza, AE, Oraby, KM: C0semigroups of operators on time scales. J. Math. Anal. Appl. (submitted)
Hamza AE, AlQubaty M: On the exponential operator functions on time scales. Adv. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2012, 7(1):57–80.
Aulbach B, Hilger S: Linear dynamics processes with inhomogeneous time scales. Math. Res. 59. In Nonlinear Dynamics and Quantum Dynamical Systems (Gaussing, 1990). Akademie, Berlin; 1990:9–20.
Aulbach B, Hilger S: A unified approach to continuous and discrete dynamics. Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 53. In Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations (Szeged, 1988). NorthHolland, Amsterdam; 1990:37–56.
Bohner M, Peterson A: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications. Birkhäuser, Basel; 2001.
Bohner M, Peterson A: Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser, Basel; 2003.
Bohner M, Martynyuk AA: Elements of stability theory of A. M. Lyapunov for dynamic equations on time scales. Prikl. Mat. Meh. 2007, 43(9):3–27. Translation in Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory 7(3), 225–257 (2007)
Choi SK, Im DM, Koo N: Stability of linear dynamic systems on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2008., 2008: Article ID 670203. doi:10.1155/2008/670203
DaCunha JJ: Stability for time varying linear dynamic systems on time scales. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2005, 176: 381–410. 10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.026
Doan TS, Kalauch A, Siegmund S: Exponential stability of linear timeinvariant systems on time scales. Nonlinear Dyn. Syst. Theory 2009, 9(1):37–50.
Du NH, Tien LH: On the exponentially stability of dynamic equations on time scales. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007, 331: 1159–1174. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.033
Gard T, Hoffacker J: Asymptotic behavior of natural growth on time scales. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 2003, 12(1–2):131–148.
Hille E Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 31. In Functional Analysis and Semigroups. Am. Math. Soc., New York; 1948.
Hilger, S: Ein Maßkettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten. PhD thesis, Universität Würzburg (1988)
Hilger S: Analysis on measure chains  a unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus. Results Math. 1990, 18: 18–56.
Hoffacker J, Tisdell CC: Stability and instability for dynamics equations on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl. 2005, 49: 1327–1334. 10.1016/j.camwa.2005.01.016
Martynyuk AA: On exponential stability of a dynamical system on a time scale. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 2008, 421: 312–317.
AlQubaty, M: On theory of dynamics equations on time scales. PhD thesis, Ain Shams University (2010)
Peterson A, Raffoul RF: Exponential stability of dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2005, 2005: 133–144.
Pötzche C, Siegmund S, Wirth F: A spectral characterization of exponential stability for linear timeinvariant systems on time scales. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 2003, 9: 1223–1241.
Pazy A: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. 1983.
Yosida K: Functional Analysis. 6th edition. Springer, Berlin; 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamza, A.E., Oraby, K.M. Stability of abstract dynamic equations on time scales. Adv Differ Equ 2012, 143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/168718472012143
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/168718472012143