Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

On the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequences of generalized Tribonacci numbers

Abstract

For any sequence recurrence formula, the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence { T n } of { b n } is defined by T n + 1 = k = 0 n ( n k ) b k + 1 for all n2, where ( n k ) = n ! k ! ( n k ) ! denotes the combination number. The recurrence formula of { T n } is obtained by the properties of the third-order linear recurrence sequence.

1 Introduction

For any sequence { b n }, a new sequence { T n } is defined by the following method: T 1 = b 1 , T 2 = b 1 + b 2 , T 3 = b 1 +2 b 2 + b 3 , generally, T n + 1 = k = 0 n ( n k ) b k + 1 for all n2, where ( n k ) = n ! k ! ( n k ) ! is the combination number. This sequence is called the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence of { b n }. It was introduced by professor Smarandache in [1] and studied by some authors. For example, Murthy and Ashbacher [2] proposed a series of conjectures related to Fibonacci numbers and the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence, one of them is as follows.

Conjecture Let { b n }={ F 8 n + 1 }={ F 1 , F 9 , F 17 , F 25 ,}, { T n } be the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence of { b n }, then we have the recurrence formula

T n + 1 =49( T n T n 1 ),n2.

Li and Han [3] studied these problems and proved a generalized conclusion as follows.

Proposition Let { X n } be a second-order linear recurrence sequence with X 0 =u, X 1 =v, X n + 1 =a X n +b X n 1 for all n1, where a 2 +4b>0. For any positive integer d2, we define the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence of { X d n + 1 } as

T n + 1 = k = 0 n ( n k ) X d k + 1 .

Then we have the recurrence formula

T n + 1 =(2+ A d +b A d 2 ) T n ( 1 + A d + b A d 2 + ( b ) d ) T n 1 ,

where the sequence { A n } is defined as A 0 =1, A 1 =a, A n + 1 =a A n +b A n 1 for all n1.

It is clear that if we take b=1, then X n is the Fibonacci polynomials, see [47].

The main purpose of this paper is, using the elementary method and the properties of the third-order linear recurrence sequence, to unify the above results by proving the following theorem.

Theorem Let { X n } be a third-order linear recurrence sequence X n + 3 =a X n + 2 +b X n + 1 +c X n with the initial values X 0 =u, X 1 =v and X 2 =w for all n1, where a, b and c are positive integers. For any positive integer d2, we define the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence of { X d n + 1 } as

T n + 1 = k = 0 n ( n k ) X d k + 1 .

Then we have the recurrence formula

T n + 1 = g 1 g 3 g 1 g 6 + g 7 g 3 g 6 T n + g 3 g 4 g 2 g 6 g 1 g 7 g 3 g 6 T n 1 + g 3 g 5 g 2 g 7 g 3 g 6 T n 2 ,

where

g 1 = f 1 + f 2 + c A d f 5 , g 2 = f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d f 6 , g 3 = c A d + 1 2 c A d f 2 + c A d f 4 , g 4 = f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d ( f 5 + f 6 ) , g 5 = c A d f 6 , g 6 = c ( A d + 1 A d f 2 + A d f 4 A d ) , g 7 = c A d f 4

and

f 1 = b A d + c A d 1 + 1 , f 2 = 1 + A d + 2 , f 3 = b A d 1 + c A d , f 4 = 1 + c A d 1 c A d 2 A d + 1 , f 5 = A d A d + 1 , f 6 = b A d 1 + c A d 2 b A d 2 + c A d 1 A d + A d A d + 1 ,

the sequence { A n } is defined by A n + 3 =a A n + 2 +b A n + 1 +c A n with the initial values A 1 =0, A 2 =1 and A 3 =a for all n1.

From our theorem we know that if { b n } is a third-order linear recurrence sequence, then its Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence { T n } is also a third-order linear recurrence sequence.

2 Proof of the theorem

To complete the proof of our theorem, we need the following lemma.

Lemma Let integers m0 and n3. If the sequence { X n } satisfies the recurrence relations X n + 3 =a X n + 2 +b X n + 1 +c X n , n0, then we have the identity

X m + n = A n X m + 2 +(b A n 1 +c A n 2 ) X m + 1 +c A n 1 X m ,

where A n is defined by A n + 3 =a A n + 2 +b A n + 1 +c A n with the initial values A 1 =0, A 2 =1 and A 3 =a for all n1.

Proof Now we prove this lemma by mathematical induction. Note that the recurrence formula X m + 3 =a X m + 2 +b X m + 1 +c X m = A 3 X m + 2 +(b A 2 +c A 1 ) X m + 1 +c A 2 X m for all n1. That is, the lemma holds for n=3 since

X m + 4 = a ( a X m + 2 + b X m + 1 + c X m ) + b X m + 2 + c X m + 1 = ( a 2 + b ) X m + 2 + ( a b + c ) X m + 1 + a c X m = A 4 X m + 2 + ( b A 3 + c A 2 ) X m + 1 + c A 3 X m .

That is, the lemma holds for n=4. Suppose that for all integers 2nk, we have X m + n = A n X m + 2 +(b A n 1 +c A n 2 ) X m + 1 +c A n 1 X m . Then, for n=k+1, from the recurrence relations for X m and the inductive hypothesis, we have

X m + k + 1 = a X m + k + b X m + k 1 + c X m + k 2 = a ( A k X m + 2 + ( b A k 1 + c A k 2 ) X m + 1 + c A k 1 X m ) + b ( A k 1 X m + 2 + ( b A k 2 + c A k 3 ) X m + 1 + c A k 2 X m ) + c ( A k 2 X m + 2 + ( b A k 3 + c A k 4 ) X m + 1 + c A k 3 X m ) = ( a A k + b A k 1 + c A k 2 ) X m + 2 + ( a b A k 1 + ( a c + b 2 ) A k 2 + 2 b c A k 3 + c 2 A k 4 ) X m + 1 + c ( a A k 1 + b A k 2 + c A k 3 ) X m = A k + 1 X m + 2 + ( a b A k 1 + b 2 A k 2 + b c A k 3 + c A k 1 ) X m + 1 + c A k X m = A k + 1 X m + 2 + ( b A k + c A k 1 ) X m + 1 + c A k X m .

That is, the lemma also holds for n=k+1. This completes the proof of our lemma by mathematical induction. □

Now we use this lemma to complete the proof of our theorem. From the properties of the binomial coefficient ( n k ) , we have

( n 1 k ) + ( n 1 k 1 ) = ( n 1 ) ! k ! ( n 1 k ) ! + ( n 1 ) ! ( k 1 ) ! ( n k ) ! = ( n 1 ) ! ( k 1 ) ! ( n k 1 ) ! ( 1 k + 1 n k ) = ( n k ) .
(1)

For any positive integer d, from the lemma we have X d k + d + 1 = A d + 1 X d k + 2 +(b A d +c A d 1 ) X d k + 1 +c A d X d k . By the definition of T n , we may deduce that

T n + 1 = k = 0 n ( n k ) X d k + 1 = X 1 + X d n + 1 + k = 1 n 1 ( ( n 1 k ) + ( n 1 k 1 ) ) X d k + 1 = k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 1 + k = 0 n 2 ( n 1 k ) X d k + d + 1 + X d n + 1 = T n + k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + d + 1 = T n + k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) ( A d + 1 X d k + 2 + ( b A d + c A d 1 ) X d k + 1 + c A d X d k ) = ( b A d + c A d 1 + 1 ) T n + A d + 1 k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 2 + c A d k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k .

For convenience, we let f 1 ( A k )=b A d +c A d 1 +1 (briefly f 1 ), then the above identity implies that

T n + 1 = f 1 T n + A d + 1 k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 2 +c A d k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k .
(2)

From this identity, we can also deduce

T n = f 1 T n 1 + A d + 1 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 +c A d k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k

and

T n 1 = f 1 T n 2 + A d + 1 k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + 2 +c A d k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k .

They are equivalent to

k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 = 1 A d + 1 ( T n f 1 T n 1 c A d k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k )
(3)

and

k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + 2 = 1 A d + 1 ( T n 1 f 1 T n 2 c A d k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k ) .
(4)

On the other hand, from the lemma we also deduce X d k + d + 2 = A d + 2 X d k + 2 +(b A d + 1 +c A d ) X d k + 1 +c A d + 1 X d k . Then we have

k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 2 = X 2 + X d n d + 2 + k = 1 n 2 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 2 = X 2 + X d n d + 2 + k = 1 n 2 ( ( n 2 k ) + ( n 2 k 1 ) ) X d k + 2 = k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + d + 2 + k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 = k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) ( A d + 2 X d k + 2 + ( b A d + 1 + c A d ) X d k + 1 + c A d + 1 X d k ) + k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 = ( 1 + A d + 2 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 + c A d + 1 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + ( b A d + 1 + c A d ) T n 1 .
(5)

Similarly, applying formula (1) and identity (3), we have

k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k = X 0 + X d n d + k = 1 n 2 ( n 1 k ) X d k = X 0 + X d n d + k = 1 n 2 ( ( n 2 k ) + ( n 2 k 1 ) ) X d k = k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) ( A d X d k + 2 + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 ) X d k + 1 + c A d 1 X d k ) + k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k = A d k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 + ( 1 + c A d 1 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 ) T n 1 = A d A d + 1 ( T n ( b A d + c A d 1 + 1 ) T n 1 c A d k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k ) + ( 1 + c A d 1 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 ) T n 1 = A d A d + 1 T n + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 b A d 2 + c A d 1 A d + A d A d + 1 ) T n 1 + ( 1 + c A d 1 c A d 2 A d + 1 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k .
(6)

For convenience, we let

f 2 = 1 + A d + 2 , f 3 = b A d + 1 + c A d , f 4 = 1 + c A d 1 c A d 2 A d + 1 , f 5 = A d A d + 1 , f 6 = b A d 1 + c A d 2 b A d 2 + c A d 1 A d + A d A d + 1 ,

then identities (5) and (6) imply that

k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k + 2 = f 2 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 + c A d + 1 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + f 3 T n 1 ,
(7)
k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k = f 4 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + f 5 T n + f 6 T n 1 .
(8)

Combining (2), (3), (7) and (8), we deduce

T n + 1 = ( f 1 + f 2 + c A d f 5 ) T n + ( f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d f 6 ) T n 1 + ( c A d + 1 2 c A d f 2 + c A d f 4 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k .
(9)

Applying formula (1), we deduce

( n k ) = ( n 1 k ) + ( n 1 k 1 ) = ( n 2 k ) + ( n 2 k 1 ) + ( n 1 k 1 ) .
(10)

From this and identities (3) and (4), note that X d k + d = A d X d k + 2 +(b A d 1 +c A d 2 ) X d k + 1 +c A d 1 X d k , we have

k = 0 n 1 ( n 1 k ) X d k = X 0 + X d n d + ( n 1 n 2 ) X d n 2 d + k = 1 n 3 ( n 1 k ) X d k = X 0 + X d n d + ( n 1 ) X d n 2 d + k = 1 n 3 ( ( n 3 k ) + ( n 3 k 1 ) + ( n 2 k 1 ) ) X d k = X 0 + X d n d + ( n 1 ) X d n 2 d + k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k X 0 + k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + d X d n 2 d + k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + d ( n 2 ) X d n 2 d X d n d = k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + d + k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + d = A d k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + 2 + A d k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + 2 + c A d 1 k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + ( c A d 1 + 1 ) k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 ) ( T n 1 + T n 2 ) = A d A d + 1 T n + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 b A d 2 + c A d 1 A d A d + 1 ) T n 1 + ( b A d 1 + c A d 2 b A d 2 + c A d 1 A d + A d A d + 1 ) T n 2 + ( c A d 1 c A d 2 A d + 1 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + ( c A d 1 + 1 c A d 2 A d + 1 ) k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k = f 5 T n + ( f 5 + f 6 ) T n 1 + f 6 T n 2 + ( f 4 1 ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + f 4 k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k .
(11)

Combining (2), (3), (7) and (11), we deduce

T n + 1 = ( f 1 + f 2 + c A d f 5 ) T n + ( f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d ( f 5 + f 6 ) ) T n 1 + c A d f 6 T n 2 + c ( A d + 1 A d f 2 + A d f 4 A d ) k = 0 n 2 ( n 2 k ) X d k + c A d f 4 k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k .
(12)

From identity (9) we can also deduce

T n = ( f 1 + f 2 + c A d f 5 ) T n 1 + ( f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d f 6 ) T n 2 + ( c A d + 1 2 c A d f 2 + c A d f 4 ) k = 0 n 3 ( n 3 k ) X d k .
(13)

For convenience, we let

g 1 = f 1 + f 2 + c A d f 5 , g 2 = f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d f 6 , g 3 = c A d + 1 2 c A d f 2 + c A d f 4 , g 4 = f 3 A d + 1 f 1 f 2 + c A d ( f 5 + f 6 ) , g 5 = c A d f 6 , g 6 = c ( A d + 1 A d f 2 + A d f 4 A d ) , g 7 = c A d f 4 .

Inserting (9) and (13) into (12), we deduce

T n + 1 = g 1 g 3 g 1 g 6 + g 7 g 3 g 6 T n + g 3 g 4 g 2 g 6 g 1 g 7 g 3 g 6 T n 1 + g 3 g 5 g 2 g 7 g 3 g 6 T n 2 .
(14)

This completes the proof of our theorem.

Remark In fact, using the above formulas, we can also obtain the recurrence formula of the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequence { T n } of { u n }, where { u n } denotes the m th-order linear recursive sequences as follows:

u n = a 1 u n 1 + a 2 u n 2 ++ a m 1 u n m + 1 + a m u n m ,

with initial values u i N for n>m and 0i<m.

References

  1. Smarandache F: Only Problems, Not Solutions. Xiquan Publishing House, Chicago; 1993.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Murthy A, Ashbacher C: Generalized Partitions and New Ideas on Number Theory and Smarandache Sequences. Hexis, Phoenix; 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Han D: On the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequences and some of their conjectures. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013., 2013: Article ID 240

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ma R, Zhang W: Several identities involving the Fibonacci numbers and Lucas numbers. Fibonacci Q. 2007, 45: 164-170.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yi Y, Zhang W: Some identities involving the Fibonacci polynomials. Fibonacci Q. 2002, 40: 314-318.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang T, Zhang W: Some identities involving Fibonacci, Lucas polynomials and their applications. Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum. 2012, 55: 95-103.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riordan J: Combinatorial Identities. Wiley, New York; 1968.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the referee for very helpful and detailed comments. This work is supported by the N.S.F. (11071194, 11001218) of P.R. China and the G.I.C.F. (YZZ12062) of NWU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhengang Wu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

ZW obtained the theorems and completed the proof. JL and HZ corrected and improved the final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Li, J. & Zhang, H. On the Smarandache-Pascal derived sequences of generalized Tribonacci numbers. Adv Differ Equ 2013, 284 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-284

Keywords