- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Some generalized Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for generalized s-convex functions on fractal sets
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2015, Article number: 301 (2015)
Abstract
In this article, some new integral inequalities of generalized Hermite-Hadamard type for generalized s-convex functions in the second sense on fractal sets have been established.
1 Introduction
The convexity of functions is an important concept in the class mathematical analysis course, and it plays a significant role in many fields, for example, in biological system, economy, optimization, and so on [1–7]. Furthermore, there are a lot of several inequalities related to the class of convex functions. For example, Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality is one of the well-known results in the literature, which can be stated as follows.
Theorem 1.1
(Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality)
Let f be a convex function on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \) with \(a_{1} < a_{2}\). If f is integral on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \), then
In [8], Dragomir and Fitzpatrick demonstrated a variation of Hadamard’s inequality which holds for s-convex functions in the second sense.
Theorem 1.2
Let \(f\colon\mathbb{R}_{+}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}_{+} \) be an s-convex function in the second sense, \(0< s<1 \) and \(a_{1},a_{2}\in \mathbb{R}_{+}\), \(a_{1}< a_{2} \). If \(f\in L^{1}([a_{1},a_{2}] )\), then
In recent years, fractional calculus played an important part in fractal mathematics and engineering. In the sense of Mandelbrot, a fractal set is the one whose Hausdorff dimension strictly exceeds the topological dimension [9–15]. Many researchers studied the properties of functions on fractal space and constructed many kinds of fractional calculus by using different approaches [16–18]. Particularly, in [19], Yang stated the analysis of local fractional functions on fractal space systematically, which includes local fractional calculus and the monotonicity of function.
The outline of this article is as follows. In Section 2, we state the operations with real line number fractal sets and some definitions are given. Some integral inequalities of generalized Hermite-Hadamard type for generalized s-convex functions in the second sense are studied in Section 3. Finally, some applications are also illustrated in Section 4. The conclusions are in Section 5.
2 Preliminaries
Let \(\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) be the real line numbers on fractal space. Then, by using Gao-Yang-Kang’s concept, one can explain the definitions of the local fractional derivative and local fractional integral as in [19–23]. Now, if \(r_{1}^{\alpha}\), \(r_{2}^{\alpha} \) and \(r_{3}^{\alpha}\in \mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) (\(0<\alpha\leq1\)), then
-
(1)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha}+ r_{2}^{\alpha}\in\mathbb{R}^{\alpha}\), \(r_{1}^{\alpha}r_{2}^{\alpha}\in\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \),
-
(2)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha}+ r_{2}^{\alpha}= r_{2}^{\alpha}+ r_{1}^{\alpha}=(r_{1}+r_{2})^{\alpha}=(r_{2}+r_{1})^{\alpha} \),
-
(3)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha}+ (r_{2}^{\alpha}+r_{3}^{\alpha })=(r_{1}^{\alpha}+ r_{2}^{\alpha})+r_{3}^{\alpha} \),
-
(4)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha} r_{2}^{\alpha}= r_{2}^{\alpha} r_{1}^{\alpha }=(r_{1} r_{2})^{\alpha}=(r_{2}r_{1})^{\alpha} \),
-
(5)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha} (r_{2}^{\alpha}r_{3}^{\alpha })=(r_{1}^{\alpha} r_{2}^{\alpha})r_{3}^{\alpha} \),
-
(6)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha} (r_{2}^{\alpha}+r_{3}^{\alpha })=(r_{1}^{\alpha} r_{2}^{\alpha})+(r_{1}^{\alpha}r_{3}^{\alpha}) \),
-
(7)
\(r_{1}^{\alpha}+0^{\alpha}=0^{\alpha}+r_{1}^{\alpha }=r_{1}^{\alpha} \) and \(r_{1}^{\alpha}\cdot1^{\alpha}=1^{\alpha }\cdot r_{1}^{\alpha}=r_{1}^{\alpha}\).
Let us state some definitions about the local fractional calculus on \(\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \).
Definition 2.1
[19]
A non-differentiable function \(y\colon\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb {R}^{\alpha} \) is called local fractional continuous at \(x_{0} \) if, for any \(\varepsilon>0 \), there exists \(\delta>0 \) such that
holds for \(|x-x_{0}|<\delta\), where \(\varepsilon,\delta\in\mathbb{R} \). \(y\in C_{\alpha}(a_{1},a_{2}) \) if it is local fractional continuous on the interval \((a_{1},a_{2}) \).
Definition 2.2
[19]
The local fractional derivative of \(y(m) \) of order α at \(m=m_{0} \) is defined by
where \({ \Gamma(m)=\int_{0}^{\infty}m^{z-1}e^{-m}\, dm }\). If there exists \({y^{(n+1)\alpha} (m)=D^{\alpha }_{m}\cdots D^{\alpha}_{m}y(m)}\) (\(n+1\) times) for any \(m\in I\subseteq \mathbb{R} \), then \(y\in D_{(n+1)\alpha}(I)\), \(n=0,1,2,\ldots\) .
Definition 2.3
[19]
The local fractional integral of function \(y(m) \) of order α is defined by, where \(y\in C_{\alpha}[a_{1},a_{2}] \),
with \(\triangle t_{i}=t_{i+1}-t_{i} \) and \(\triangle t= \max\{ \triangle t_{i}\colon i=1,2,\ldots,n-1\} \), where \([t_{i},t_{i+1}]\), \(i=0,1,\ldots,n-1 \) and \(t_{0}=a_{1}< t_{1}<\cdots<t_{n-1}<t_{n}=a_{2} \) is a partition of the interval \([a_{1},a_{2}] \).
In [24], the authors introduced the generalized convex function and established the generalized Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality on fractal space. Let \(f\colon I\subset\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) for any \(x_{1},x_{2}\in I \) and \(\gamma\in[0,1] \) if the following inequality
holds, then f is called a generalized convex function on I. In \(\alpha=1 \), we have a convex function, convexity is defined only in geometrical terms as being the property of a function whose graph bears tangents only under it [25].
Theorem 2.1
(Generalized Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality)
Let \(f\in{}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha)}_{a_{2}} \) be a generalized convex function on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \) with \(a_{1}< a_{2} \). Then
Note that it will be reduced to the class Hermite-Hadamard’s inequality (1) if \(\alpha=1 \).
In [23], Mo and Sui introduced the definitions of two kinds of generalized s-convex functions on fractal sets as follows.
Definition 2.4
-
(i)
A function \(f\colon\mathbb{R}_{+}\rightarrow\mathbb {R}^{\alpha} \) is called generalized s-convex (\(0< s<1\)) in the first sense if
$$ f(\gamma_{1}x_{1}+\gamma_{2}x_{2}) \leq\gamma_{1}^{s\alpha }f(x_{1})+\gamma_{2}^{s \alpha}f(x_{2}) $$(3)for all \(x_{1},x_{2}\in\mathbb{R}_{+} \) and all \(\gamma_{1},\gamma _{2}\geq0 \) with \(\gamma_{1}^{s}+\gamma_{2}^{s}=1 \), we denote this class of functions by \(GK^{1}_{s} \).
-
(ii)
A function \(f\colon\mathbb{R}_{+}\rightarrow\mathbb {R}^{\alpha} \) is called generalized s-convex (\(0< s<1 \)) in the second sense if inequality (3) holds for all \(x_{1},x_{2}\in \mathbb{R}_{+} \) and all \(\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2}\geq0 \) with \(\gamma _{1}+\gamma_{2}=1 \), we denote this class of functions by \(GK^{2}_{s} \).
In the same paper [23], Mo and Sui proved that all functions from \(GK^{2}_{s} \), \(s\in(0,1) \), are non-negative.
3 Main results
In [26], the authors demonstrated a variation of generalized Hadamard’s inequality which holds for a generalized s-convex function in the second sense. Now, we will give another proof for generalized s-Hadamard’s inequality.
Theorem 3.1
Let \(f\colon\mathbb{R}_{+}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha}_{+} \) be a generalized s-convex function in the second sense, \(0< s<1 \) and \(a_{1},a_{2}\in\mathbb{R}_{+} \) with \(a_{1}< a_{2} \). If \(f\in L^{1}([a_{1},a_{2}]) \), then
Proof
Since f is generalized s-convex in the second sense, then
Integrating the above inequality with respect to γ on \([0,1] \), we have
Let \(x=\gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) a_{2}\). Then we have
Now, it follows that
Then the second inequality in (4) is proved.
In order to prove the first inequality in (4), we use the following inequality:
Now, assume that \(x_{1}=\gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma)a_{2} \) and \(x_{2}=(1-\gamma)a_{1}+\gamma a_{2} \) with \(\gamma\in[0,1] \).
Then we get by inequality (5) that
By integrating both sides of the above inequalities over \([0,1] \), we have
Then it follows that
This completes the proof. □
Remark 3.1
If we set \(c=\frac{\Gamma(1+s\alpha)\Gamma(1+\alpha)}{\Gamma (1+(s+1)\alpha)} \) for \(s\in (0,1 ] \), then it is best possible in the second inequality of (4).
As the function \(f\colon[0,1]\rightarrow[0^{\alpha},1^{\alpha}] \) given by \(f(x)=x^{ s\alpha} \) is generalized s-convex in the second sense,
and
Similarly, if \(\alpha=1 \), then inequalities (4) reduce to inequalities (2).
Theorem 3.2
Let \(A\colon[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) be a function such as
where \(f\colon[a_{1},a_{2}]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) is a generalized s-convex function in the second sense, \(s\in ( 0,1 ] \), \(a_{1},a_{2}\in\mathbb{R}_{+} \), \(a_{1}< a_{2}\) and \(f\in L^{1}([a_{1},a_{2}]) \). Then
-
(i)
\(A \in GK^{2}_{s} \) on \([0,1] \),
-
(ii)
we have the inequality
$$ A(\gamma)\geq2^{\alpha(s-1)}f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) , \quad \forall\gamma\in[0,1] , $$(6) -
(iii)
and the following inequality also holds:
$$ A\leq\min \bigl\lbrace A_{1}(\gamma), A_{2}( \gamma) \bigr\rbrace ,\quad \gamma\in[0,1], $$(7)where
$$A_{1}(\gamma)=\gamma^{\alpha s}\frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha )}{(a_{2}-a_{1})^{\alpha}} {}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha)}_{a_{2}}f( x ) +(1-\gamma)^{\alpha s}f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) $$and
$$\begin{aligned} A_{2}(\gamma) =&\frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha s)\Gamma(1+\alpha)}{\Gamma (1+(s+1)\alpha)} \biggl( f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma)\frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \\ &{}+f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma)\frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr) \end{aligned}$$for \(\gamma\in ( 0,1 ]\).
-
(iv)
If \(\tilde{A}= \max\{A_{1}(\gamma),A_{2}(\gamma)\}\), \(\gamma \in[0,1] \), then
$$\tilde{A}\leq\frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha s)\Gamma(1+\alpha)}{\Gamma (1+(s+1)\alpha)} \biggl\lbrace \gamma^{\alpha s} \bigl(f(a_{1})+f(a_{2})\bigr)+2^{\alpha}(1- \gamma)^{\alpha s} f \biggl( \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr\rbrace . $$
Proof
(i) Let \(\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2}\in[0,1] \) and \(\mu_{1},\mu _{2}\geq0 \) with \(\mu_{1}+\mu_{2}=1 \), then
which implies that \(A \in GK^{2}_{s}\) on \([0,1] \).
(ii) Let \(\gamma\in (0,1 ] \) and by the change of variable \(m=\gamma x+(1-\gamma)\frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \), we have
By using the first generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality, we have
and inequality (6) is obtained.
If \(\gamma=0 \), the inequality
also holds.
(iii) By using the second part of generalized Hadamard’s inequality, we get
If \(\gamma=0 \), then the inequality
holds as it is equivalent to
and we know that for \(s\in(0,1) \),
Since
for \(\forall\gamma\in[0,1] \) and \(x\in[a_{1},a_{2}] \), then we obtain
Then, the proof of inequality (7) is complete.
(iv) We have
Since
and
then
and the proof of Theorem 3.2 is complete. □
Remark 3.2
In particular:
1. If we choose \(s =1 \) in Theorem 3.2, then we get:
-
(a)
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{\Gamma(1+\alpha)}{(a_{2}-a_{1})^{\alpha}} {}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha )}_{a_{2}}f \biggl( \gamma x+ (1-\gamma)\frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \\& \quad \leq\min\biggl\lbrace \gamma^{\alpha}\frac{\Gamma (1+\alpha)}{(a_{2}-a_{1})^{\alpha}} {}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha )}_{a_{2}}f(x)+(1-\gamma)^{\alpha}f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\& \qquad \frac{(\Gamma(1+\alpha ))^{2}}{\Gamma(1+2\alpha)} \biggl( f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \\& \qquad {}+f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{2}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr) \biggr\rbrace . \end{aligned}$$
-
(b)
Since
$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{A} =& \max\biggl\lbrace \gamma^{\alpha}\frac {\Gamma(1+\alpha)}{(a_{2}-a_{1})^{\alpha}} {}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha )}_{a_{2}}f(x)+(1-\gamma)^{\alpha}f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\ &\frac{(\Gamma(1+\alpha ))^{2}}{\Gamma(1+2\alpha)} \biggl(f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) +f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr) \biggr\rbrace , \end{aligned}$$we have
$$\tilde{A}(\gamma)\leq\frac{(\Gamma(1+\alpha))^{2}}{\Gamma(1+2\alpha )} \biggl[ \gamma^{\alpha} \bigl( f(a_{1})+f(a_{2}) \bigr) +2^{\alpha }(1- \gamma)^{\alpha}f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr] . $$
2. Now if one chooses \(\alpha=1 \) in Theorem 3.2, then we can easily obtain:
-
(a)
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})} \int_{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f \biggl( \gamma x+ (1-\gamma)\frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr)\,dx \\& \quad \leq\min\biggl\lbrace \gamma^{s} \frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})}\int _{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f(x)\,dx+(1-\gamma)^{s}f \biggl( \frac{a_{2}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\& \qquad \frac{1}{s+1} \biggl( f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) +f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr) \biggr\rbrace . \end{aligned}$$
-
(b)
Similarly we have
$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{A} =& \max\biggl\lbrace \gamma^{s}\frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})} \int _{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f(x) \,dx+(1-\gamma)^{s}f \biggl( \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\ & \frac{1}{s+1} \biggl(f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) +f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr)\biggr\rbrace \end{aligned}$$and
$$\tilde{A}(\gamma)\leq\frac{1}{s+1} \biggl[\gamma^{s} \bigl(f(a_{1})+f(a_{2})\bigr)+2(1-\gamma)^{s}f \biggl( \frac{a_{2}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr] \quad \mbox{for } \forall\gamma \in[0,1]. $$
3. If one considers \(\alpha=1 \) and \(s=1 \) in Theorem 3.2, then we get:
-
(a)
$$\begin{aligned}& \frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})} \int_{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f \biggl( \gamma x+ (1-\gamma)\frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr)\,dx \\& \quad \leq\min\biggl\lbrace \gamma\frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})}\int_{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f(x) \,dx+(1-\gamma)f \biggl( \frac{a_{2}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\& \qquad \frac{1}{2} \biggl( f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) +f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr) \biggr\rbrace . \end{aligned}$$
-
(b)
$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{A} =& \max\biggl\lbrace \gamma\frac{1}{(a_{2}-a_{1})} \int _{a_{1}}^{a_{2}}f(x)\,dx+(1-\gamma)f \biggl( \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr), \\ &\frac{1}{2} \biggl(f \biggl( \gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) +f \biggl( \gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma) \frac{a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr)\biggr\rbrace \end{aligned}$$
and
$$\tilde{A}(\gamma)\leq\frac{1}{2} \biggl[\gamma \bigl(f(a_{1})+f(a_{2}) \bigr)+2(1-\gamma)f \biggl( \frac{a_{2}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \biggr] \quad \mbox{for } \forall\gamma\in[0,1]. $$
Theorem 3.3
Let \(g\colon[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \) be a function such as
where \(f\colon[a_{1},a_{2}]\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^{\alpha}_{+} \) is a generalized s-convex function in the second sense, \(s\in ( 0,1 ] \), \(a_{1},a_{2}\in\mathbb{R}_{+} \) which \(a_{1}< a_{2} \) and \(f\in L^{1}([a_{1},a_{2}]) \). Then:
-
(i)
\(g\in GK^{2}_{s}\) in \([0,1] \). If \(f\in GK^{1}_{s} \), then \(g\in GK^{1}_{s} \).
-
(ii)
\(g(\gamma+\frac{1}{2})= g(\frac{1}{2}-\gamma)\) for all \(\gamma=[0,\frac{1}{2}] \) and \(g(\gamma)\) is symmetric about \(\gamma =\frac{1}{2} \).
-
(iii)
We have the inequality
$$ g(\gamma)\geq\frac{2^{\alpha(s-1)}}{(\Gamma(1+\alpha))^{2}} A(\gamma )\geq\frac{4^{\alpha(s-1)}}{(\Gamma(1+\alpha))^{2}}f \biggl( \frac {a_{1}+a_{2}}{2} \biggr) \quad \textit{for } \forall\gamma\in[0,1] . $$(8) -
(iv)
We have the inequality
$$ g(\gamma) \leq\min\bigl\{ g_{1}(\gamma),g_{2}( \gamma)\bigr\} , $$(9)where
$$g_{1}(\gamma)=\bigl[\gamma^{\alpha s}+(1-\gamma)^{\alpha s} \bigr]\frac{1}{\Gamma (1+\alpha)(a_{2}-a_{1})^{\alpha}} {}_{a_{1}}I^{(\alpha)}_{a_{2}}f(x_{1}) $$and
$$g_{2}(\gamma)= \biggl[ \frac{\Gamma(1+s\alpha)}{\Gamma(1+(s+1)\alpha )} \biggr]^{2} \bigl[ f(a_{1})+f\bigl(\gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma)a_{2} \bigr)+f\bigl((1-\gamma )a_{1}+\gamma a_{2} \bigr)+f(a_{2}) \bigr] $$for \(\forall\gamma\in[0,1] \).
Proof
(i) Take \(\lbrace\gamma_{1},\gamma_{2} \rbrace\subset[0,1] \), \(\gamma_{1}+\gamma_{2}=1 \), \(t_{1},t_{2}\in D \) and \(f\in GK^{2}_{s} \), then we have
which implies that \(g\in GK^{2}_{s} \) in \([0,1] \).
(ii) Let \(\gamma\in[0,\frac{1}{2}] \), then
\(g(\gamma) \) is symmetric about \(\gamma=\frac{1}{2} \) because \(g(\gamma)=g(1-\gamma) \).
(iii) Let us observe that
Now, since \(x_{2} \) is fixed in \([a_{1},a_{2}] \), then the function
can be given by
As it was shown in the proof of Theorem 3.2, for \(\gamma\in[0,1]\), we have equality
where \(b_{2}=\gamma a_{2} +(1-\gamma)x_{2} \) and \(b_{1}=\gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma) x_{2}\). By using the generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality, we have
for all \(\gamma\in(0,1) \) and \(x_{2}\in[a_{1},a_{2}] \). Integrating on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \) over \(x_{2} \), we have
Further, since \(g(\gamma)=g(1-\gamma) \), then the proof of inequality (8) is done for \(\gamma\in(0,1)\). If \(\gamma=0 \) or \(\gamma=1 \), then inequality (8) also holds.
(iv) Since \(f(\gamma x_{1}+(1-\gamma)x_{2})\leq\gamma^{\alpha s}f(x_{1})+(1-\gamma)^{\alpha s}f(x_{2})\) for all \(x_{1},x_{2}\in [a_{1},a_{2}] \) and \(\gamma\in[0,1] \), integrating the above inequality on \([a_{1},a_{2}]^{2} \), we have
The proof of the first part in (9) is done.
By the second part of the generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality, we obtain
where \(b_{2}=\gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma)x_{2} \) and \(b_{1}=\gamma a_{1}+(1-\gamma)x_{2} \), \(\gamma\in[0,1] \). Integrating this inequality on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \) over \(x_{2} \), then
A simple calculation shows that
where \(c_{2}=a_{2}\), \(c_{1}=\gamma a_{2}+(1-\gamma)a_{1} \) and \(\gamma \in(0,1) \). Similarly, for \(\gamma\in(0,1)\),
Then
If \(\gamma=0 \) or \(\gamma=1 \), then this inequality also holds. □
Remark 3.3
If \(\alpha=1 \) in the above theorem, then
and
Theorem 3.4
Let us consider that a sum of A belongs to \(GK^{2}_{s} \),
where
then
-
(i)
\(\sup(A)=2^{\alpha}\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{i}(0)=2^{\alpha}\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}(1)\),
-
(ii)
A is symmetric about \(\gamma=\frac{1}{2} \),
-
(iii)
\(A\in GK^{2}_{s} \).
Proof
(i)
Since \(f_{i} \) are generalized s-convex functions, we get
(ii) \(a_{i}(\gamma) \) is symmetric about \(\gamma=\frac{1}{2} \) since \(a_{i}(\gamma)=a_{i}(1-\gamma)\), ∀i.
Then \(A(1-\gamma)=A(\gamma) \) and A also is.
(iii) Since \(a_{i}(\gamma x_{1}+(1-\gamma)x_{2})\leq\gamma ^{\alpha s} a_{i}(x_{1})+(1-\gamma)^{\alpha s}a_{i}(x_{2}) \), then
that is, \(A\in GK^{2}_{s} \). □
4 Applications to special means
We now consider the applications of our theorems to the following generalized means:
and
In [23], the following example is given.
Let \(0< s<1 \) and \(a_{1}^{\alpha},a_{2}^{\alpha},a_{3}^{\alpha}\in \mathbb{R}^{\alpha} \). Define, for \(x\in\mathbb{R}_{+} \),
If \(a_{2}^{\alpha}\geq0^{\alpha} \) and \(0^{\alpha}\leq a_{3}^{\alpha }\leq a_{1}^{\alpha} \), then \(f\in GK^{2}_{s} \).
Proposition 4.1
Let \(a_{1}, a_{2}\in\mathbb{R}_{+}\), \(a_{1}< a_{2} \) and \(a_{2}-a_{1}\leq1 \), then the following inequalities hold:
Proof
If \(f\in GK^{2}_{s} \) on \([a_{1},a_{2}] \) for some \(\gamma\in[0,1] \) and \(s\in ( 0,1 ] \), then, in Theorem 3.3, if \(f\colon[0,1]\rightarrow[0^{\alpha},1^{\alpha}] \), \(f(x)=x^{2\alpha}\), where \(x\in[a_{1},a_{2}]\) and \(s=1 \), so
Then, by Theorem 3.3, we get
Then we obtain inequality (10).
By applying Theorem 3.3, we obtain inequality (11) as follows:
□
5 Conclusion
In this article, we have established some new integral inequalities of generalized Hermite-Hadamard type for generalized s-convex functions in the second sense on fractal sets \(\mathbb{R}^{\alpha}\), \(0<\alpha<1 \). In particular, our results extend some important inequalities in a classical situation; when \(\alpha=1 \), some relationships between these inequalities and the classical inequalities have been established. Finally, we have also given some applications for these inequalities on fractal sets.
References
Kılıçman, A, Saleh, W: Some inequalities for generalized s-convex functions. JP J. Geom. Topol. 17, 63-82 (2015)
Ruel, JJ, Ayres, MP: Jensen’s inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14(9), 361-366 (1999)
Li, M, Wang, J, Wei, W: Some fractional Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for convex and Godunova-Levin functions. Facta Univ., Ser. Math. Inform. 30(2), 195-208 (2015)
Liu, W: Ostrowski type fractional integral inequalities for MT-convex functions. Miskolc Math. Notes 16(1), 249-256 (2015)
Lin, Z, Wang, JR, Wei, W: Fractional Hermite-Hadamard inequalities through r-convex functions via power means. Facta Univ., Ser. Math. Inform. 30(2), 129-145 (2015)
Liu, W: New integral inequalities involving beta function via P-convexity. Miskolc Math. Notes 15(2), 585-591 (2014)
Budak, H, Sarikaya, MZ: Some new generalized Hermite-Hadamard inequality for generalized convex function and applications. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 18, 82 (2015)
Dragomir, SS, Fitzpatrick, S: The Hadamard inequalities for s-convex functions in the second sense. Demonstr. Math. 32(4), 687-696 (1999)
Golmankhaneh, AK, Baleanu, D: On a new measure on fractals. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 552 (2013)
Kolwankar, KM, Gangal, AD: Local fractional calculus: a calculus for fractal space-time. In: Fractals: Theory and Applications in Engineering, pp. 171-181. Springer, London (1999)
Yang, Y-J, Baleanu, D, Yang, X-J: Analysis of fractal wave equations by local fractional Fourier series method. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013, Article ID 632309 (2013)
Noor, MA, Noor, KI, Awan, MU, Khan, S: Fractional Hermite-Hadamard inequalities for some new classes of Godunova-Levin functions. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 8(6), 2865-2872 (2014)
Liu, W: Some Ostrowski type inequalities via Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals for h-convex functions. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 16(5), 998-1004 (2014)
Erden, S, Sarikaya, MZ: Generalized Bullen type inequalities for local fractional integrals and its applications. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 18, 81 (2015)
Budak, H, Sarikaya, MZ, Yildirim, H: New inequalities for local fractional integrals. RGMIA Res. Rep. Collect. 18, 88 (2015)
Babakhani, A, Daftardar-Gejji, V: On calculus of local fractional derivatives. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 270(1), 66-79 (2002)
Carpinteri, A, Chiaia, B, Cornetti, P: Static-kinematic duality and the principle of virtual work in the mechanics of fractal media. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 191(1-2), 3-19 (2001)
Zhao, Y, Cheng, DF, Yang, XJ: Approximation solutions for local fractional Schrödinger equation in the one-dimensional Cantorian system. Adv. Math. Phys. 2013, Article ID 291386 (2013)
Yang, XJ: Advanced Local Fractional Calculus and Its Applications. World Science Publisher, New York (2012)
Yang, XJ, Baleanu, D, Machado, JAT: Mathematical aspects of Heisenberg uncertainty principle within local fractional Fourier analysis. Bound. Value Probl. 2013(1), 131 (2013)
Yang, AM, Chen, ZS, Srivastava, HM, Yang, XJ: Application of the local fractional series expansion method and the variational iteration method to the Helmholtz equation involving local fractional derivative operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 259125 (2013)
Yang, XJ, Baleanu, D, Khan, Y, Mohyud-Din, ST: Local fractional variational iteration method for diffusion and wave equations on Cantor sets. Rom. J. Phys. 59(1-2), 36-48 (2014)
Mo, H, Sui, X: Generalized s-convex functions on fractal sets. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 254731 (2014)
Mo, H, Sui, X, Yu, D: Generalized convex functions on fractal sets and two related inequalities. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 636751 (2014)
Hörmander, L: Notions of Convexity. Birkhäuser, Basel (1994)
Mo, H, Sui, X: Hermite-Hadamard type inequalities for generalized s-convex functions on real linear fractal set \(\mathbb{R}^{\alpha}\) (\(0<\alpha<1 \)) (2015). arXiv:1506.07391
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referees for valuable suggestions and comments, which helped the authors to improve this article substantially.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors jointly worked on deriving the results and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Kılıçman, A., Saleh, W. Some generalized Hermite-Hadamard type integral inequalities for generalized s-convex functions on fractal sets. Adv Differ Equ 2015, 301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0639-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0639-8