- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
The eigenvalue problem for a coupled system of singular p-Laplacian differential equations involving fractional differential-integral conditions
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2016, Article number: 209 (2016)
Abstract
In this paper, we deal with a coupled system of singular p-Laplacian differential equations involving fractional differential-integral conditions. By employing Schauder’s fixed point theorem and the upper and lower solution method, we establish an eigenvalue interval for the existence of positive solutions. As an application an example is presented to illustrate the main results.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we consider the following system of nonlinear fractional differential equations with different fractional derivatives:
where \(D^{\alpha_{i}},D^{\beta_{i}}, D^{\gamma_{i}}\) (\(i=1,2\)) are the standard Riemannn-Liouville fractional derivatives, \(I^{\omega_{i}}\) is the Riemannn-Liouville fractional integral, \(\varphi_{p_{i}}\) is the p-Laplacian operator defined by \(\varphi_{p_{i}}(s)=|s|^{p_{i}-2}s,p_{i}>2 \) (\(i=1,2\)), and the nonlinearity \(f_{1}(x,y,z)\) may be singular at \(x=0,y=0,z=0\).
Throughout this paper, we always suppose that:
- (s0):
-
\(0<\gamma_{i}\leq1<\alpha_{i}<\beta_{i}<2, \alpha_{1}-\gamma _{1}>1, \alpha_{2}-\gamma_{2}>1, \omega_{i}>0, \xi_{i}>0, \eta_{i}\in[0,1]\) (\(i=1,2\)).
- (s1):
-
\(\Gamma(\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega_{i})>\xi_{i}\eta_{i}^{\alpha _{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega_{i}-1}\) (\(i=1,2\)).
- (s2):
-
Let \(q_{i}\) satisfies the relation \(\frac{1}{q_{i}}+\frac {1}{p_{i}}=1\), where \(p_{i}\) is given by (1.1), then \(1< q_{i}<2\).
Fractional calculus provides an excellent tool for describing the hereditary properties of various materials and processes. Concerning the development of theory, method and application of fractional calculus, we refer the reader to the recent papers [1–8].
On the other hand, the study of coupled systems involving fractional differential equations is also important as such systems occur in various problems of applied nature. So considerable work has been done to study the existence result for them nowadays [9–12]. The authors got the existence solutions by the method of the fixed point theorem, the coincidence degree theorem, or Schauder’s fixed point theorem.
The theory of upper and lower solutions is well known to be an effective method to deal with the existence of solutions for the boundary value problems of the fractional differential equations. In [13] the authors used the method of upper and lower solutions and investigated the existence of solutions for initial value problems. By the same method some people got the solutions of boundary value problems for fractional differential equations, such as [14, 15]. To the best of our knowledge, only few papers considered the existence of solutions by using the method of upper and lower solutions for boundary value problems with fractional coupled systems.
The aim of this paper is to deal with the eigenvalue problem for a coupled system of fractional differential equations involving differential-integral conditions. The novelty of this paper is that the nonlinear terms \(f_{1}\), \(f_{2}\) in the system (1.1) involve different unknown functions \(u_{1}(t)\), \(u_{2}(t)\) and their Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives with different orders, and \(f_{1}(x,y,z)\) may be singular at \(x=0, y=0, z=0\). We establish an eigenvalue interval for the existence of positive solutions by Schauder’s fixed point theorem and the upper and lower solutions method.
2 Preliminaries and lemmas
Lemma 2.1
([16])
Let \(h_{i}\in L^{1} (0,1)\), then the problem
has the unique solution \(v_{i}(t)=\int_{0}^{1}G(\beta_{i},t,s)h_{i}(s)\,ds\) (\(i=1,2\)), where
Lemma 2.2
([17])
Let \(h_{i}\in L^{1} (0,1)\), then the fractional integral boundary value problem
has a unique solution \(v_{i}(t)=\int_{0}^{1}H_{i}(t,s)h_{i}(s)\,ds\), where
and \(\Delta_{i}=\Gamma(\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i})[\Gamma(\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega _{i})-\xi_{i}\eta_{i}^{\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega_{i}-1}]\).
Lemma 2.3
The functions \(G(\beta_{i},t,s)\) and \(H_{i}(t,s)\) have the following properties:
-
(1)
\(G(\beta_{i},t,s)>0\), \(H_{i}(t,s)>0\), for \(t,s\in(0,1)\).
-
(2)
$$\frac{t^{\beta_{i}-1}(1-t)s(1-s)^{\beta_{i}-1}}{\Gamma(\beta_{i})}\leq G(\beta _{i},t,s)\leq\frac{\beta_{i}-1}{\Gamma(\beta_{i})}t^{\beta_{i}-1}(1-t), \quad \textit{for } t,s\in[0,1]. $$
-
(3)
$$e_{i}t^{\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}-1}\bigl[1-(1-s)^{\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}-1}\bigr]\leq H_{i}(t,s)\leq d_{i} t^{\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}-1}, \quad \textit{for } t,s\in[0,1], $$
where \(d_{i}=\frac{1}{\Delta_{i}}[\Gamma(\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega_{i})+\xi _{i}\eta_{i}^{\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i}+\omega_{i}-1}]\), \(e_{i}=\Gamma(\alpha_{i}-\gamma_{i})\).
Proof
From [18], we can see that \(G(\beta_{i},t,s)>0\) and (2) hold.
In the following, we will prove (3).
For \(s\leq t,s\leq\eta_{i}\),
For \(t\leq s\leq\eta_{i}\),
For \(\eta_{i}\leq s\leq t\),
For \(s\geq t,s\geq\eta_{i}\),
From the above, the proof of (3) is completed. Clearly \(H_{i}(t,s)>0\) for \((t,s)\in(0,1)\), since (3) holds. □
Lemma 2.4
([17])
Let \(h_{1}\in L^{1} (0,1)\), if (s0)-(s2) hold, then the fractional boundary value problem
has the unique positive solution
Now let us consider the following modified problem of the BVP (1.1):
Lemma 2.5
Let \(u_{i}(t)=I^{\gamma_{i}}v_{i}(t)\), \(v_{i}(t)\in C[0,1]\) (\(i=1,2\)). Then (1.1) can be transformed into (2.3). Moveover, if \((v_{1}(t),v_{2}(t))\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a positive solution of the problem (2.3), then \((I^{\gamma_{1}}v_{1}(t), I^{\gamma_{2}}v_{2}(t))\) is a positive solution of the problem (1.1).
Proof
Let \(u_{i}(t)=I^{\gamma_{i}}v_{i}(t),v_{i}(t)\in C[0,1]\), by the definition of the Riemannn-Liouville fractional derivatives and integrals, we obtain
Thus by applying (2.4), the BVP (1.1) reduces to the modified boundary value problem (2.3).
Consequently, if \((v_{1}(t),v_{2}(t))\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a positive solution of the problem (2.3), then \((I^{\gamma_{1}}v_{1}(t), I^{\gamma_{2}}v_{2}(t))\) is a positive solution of the problem (1.1).
It is well know that \((v_{1},v_{2})\in C[0,1]\times C[0,1]\) is a solution of system (2.3), if and only if \((v_{1},v_{2})\in C[0,1]\times \in C[0,1]\) is a solution of the following nonlinear integral equation system:
Now define an operator
Then the integral system (2.5) is equivalent to the following nonlinear integral-differential equation:
i.e. the operator equation
 □
Definition 2.1
A continuous function \(\Psi(t)\) is called a lower solution of the problem (2.6) if it is satisfies
where
Definition 2.2
A continuous function \(\Phi(t)\) is called an upper solution of the problem (2.6) if it is satisfies
where
Lemma 2.6
(Maximal principle)
If \(v_{1}\in C([0,1],R)\) satisfies
and \(-D^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}}v_{1}(t)\geq0\) for any \(t\in[0,1]\), then \(v_{1}(t)\geq0, t\in[0,1]\)
Proof
By Lemma 2.3, the conclusion is obvious, we omit the proof. □
3 Main results
To establish the existence of a solution to the boundary value problem (1.1), we need to make the following assumptions.
- (H1):
-
\(f_{1}(x,y,z): (0,+\infty)^{3}\rightarrow[0,+\infty]\) is continuous and non-increasing in \(x,y,z>0\), respectively, and for all \(r\in(0,1)\), there exists a constant \(\varepsilon>0\), such that, for any \((x,y,z)\in(0,+\infty)^{3}\), we have
$$f_{1}(rx,ry,rz)\leq r^{-\varepsilon}f_{1}(x,y,z). $$ - (H2):
-
\(f_{2}(t,x): [0,1]\times[0,+\infty)\rightarrow[0,+\infty]\) is continuous and non-decreasing in \(x>0\), and there exists a constant \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{q_{2}-1}\), such that, for any \(r\in(0,1)\), \((t,x)\in[0,1]\times[0,+\infty)\), we have
$$f_{2}(t,rx)\geq r^{\sigma}f_{2}(t,x). $$
Remark
For \(r\geq1\), and \(x,y,z>0\), we have
Theorem 3.1
Suppose (H1) and (H2) hold, and the following condition is satisfied:
- (H3):
-
\(f_{1}(1,1,1)\neq0\), and
$$0< \int_{0}^{1}f_{1}\biggl( \frac{\Gamma(\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1})}{\Gamma(\alpha _{1})}t^{\alpha_{1}-1},t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}, bt^{\alpha_{2}-\gamma_{2}-1}\biggr)\,dt< + \infty, $$where
$$\begin{aligned}& \begin{aligned}[b] b={}&e_{2} \int_{0}^{1}\bigl[1-(1-s)^{\alpha_{2}-\gamma_{2}-1} \bigr]s^{(\beta _{2}-1)(q_{2}-1)}(1-s)^{q_{2}-1}\,ds\\ &{}\times \biggl( \frac{1}{\Gamma(\beta_{2})} \int _{0}^{1}\tau(1-\tau)^{\beta_{2}-1}f_{2} \biggl(\tau,\frac{\Gamma(\alpha_{1}-\gamma _{1})}{\Gamma(\alpha_{1})} \tau^{\alpha_{1}-1}\biggr)\,d\tau \biggr)^{q_{2}-1}, \end{aligned}\\& e_{2}=\Gamma(\alpha_{2}-\gamma_{2}). \end{aligned}$$
Then there exists a constant \(\lambda^{*}>0\) such that for any \(\lambda \in(\lambda^{*},+\infty)\), the BVP (1.1) has at least one positive solution \((u_{1}(t),u_{2}(t))\), and, moreover, there exist two constants \(0< l<1\) and \(L>1\) such that
where
Proof
Let \(E=C[0,1]\), and define a subset P of E as follows: \(P=\{v_{1}(t)\in E: \mbox{there exists a}\mbox{ }\mbox{constant }0< l<1 \mbox{ such that } lt^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}\leq v_{1}(t)\leq l^{-1}t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma _{1}-1}, t\in[0,1]\}\). Clearly, P is a nonempty set, since \(t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}\in P\). Also
Now define the operator \(T_{\lambda}\) in E
where
We assert that \(T_{\lambda}\) is well defined and \(T_{\lambda}(P)\subset P\). In fact, for any \(v_{1}(t)\in P\), there exists a positive number \(0< l_{v_{1}}<1\) such that \(l_{v_{1}}t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}\leq v_{1}(t)\leq l_{v_{1}}^{-1}t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}, t\in[0,1]\). It follows from Lemma 2.3 and (H2) that
and
Then,
where
and
where
Since \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{q_{2}-1}\), and by Lemma 2.3 and (H1), (H3), we also have
On the other hand, as \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{q_{2}-1}\), from Lemma 2.3 and (3.1), we have
where
Choose
Then it follows from (3.4)-(3.8) that
This implies that \(T_{\lambda}\) is well defined and \(T_{\lambda}(P)\subset P\). Furthermore, comparing (3.3) and (2.2), the right hand side of (3.3) is exactly the same as the right hand of (2.2), if \(h_{1}(t)\) in (2.1) is taken as \(\lambda f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}v_{1}(t),v_{1}(t),Av_{1}(t))\). Hence as the left hand side of (2.2), i.e. \(v_{1}(t)\) satisfies equation (2.1) according to Lemma 2.4, the left hand side of (3.3), i.e. \(T_{\lambda}v_{1}(t)\) must also satisfy equation (2.1) with \(h_{1}(t)\) replace by \(\lambda f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}v_{1}(t),v_{1}(t),Av_{1}(t))\), namely
where
Next, we shall find the upper and lower solutions of (1.1). First of all, let
where
Similar to (3.4) and (3.5), the following inequalities are also valid:
and
By Lemma 2.3, (H1), and (3.7), we also have
and consequently there exists a constant \(\lambda_{1}\geq1\) such that
On the other hand by (H1) and (H2), we know that A is increasing and \(T_{\lambda}\) is decreasing, and thus for \(\lambda>\lambda_{1}\), from (3.6) we have
Applying (3.2) and \(0<\sigma<\frac{1}{q_{2}-1}\), for any \(t\in[0,1]\), we have
Let
then we have
Now, take
Then by (3.12), (3.13), and (H1), we have
Consequently, (3.7) and (3.14) yield
Let
then
It follows from the monotonicity of A, \(f_{1}\), and (3.10), (3.15), that for any \(t\in[0,1]\)
Moveover, by (3.9) and (3.16), we know
Proceeding as in (3.6)-(3.8), we get that \(\Phi(t),\Psi(t)\in P\). By (3.16) and (3.17), we have
which implies
Thus, by (3.9), (3.16), (3.17), and (3.20)
It follows from (3.18) and (3.21)-(3.22) that \(\Psi(t),\Phi(t)\) are upper and lower solutions of BVP (2.6), and that \(\Psi(t), \Phi(t)\in P\). Now let us define a function
Clearly, \(F:[0,+\infty]\rightarrow[0,+\infty] \) is continuous.
We now show that the fractional boundary value problem
has a positive solution. Define the operator \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\) by
Then \(D_{\lambda^{*}}:C[0,1]\rightarrow C[0,1]\), and a fixed point of the operator \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\) is a solution of the BVP (3.23). On the other hand, from the definition of F and the fact that the function \(f_{1}(x,y,z)\) is non-increasing in \(x, y, z\) respectively, and A is non-decreasing, we obtain \(f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}\Phi(t),\Phi(t),A\Phi(t)) \leq F(v_{1}(t))\leq f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}\Psi(t),\Psi(t),A\Psi(t))\), provided that \(\Psi(t)\leq v_{1}(t)\leq\Phi(t)\), \(F(v_{1}(t))=f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}\Psi(t), \Psi(t),A\Psi (t))\), provided that \(v_{1}(t)<\Psi(t)\), and \(F(v_{1}(t))=f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}\Phi(t),\Phi(t),A\Phi(t))\), provided that \(v_{1}(t)>\Phi(t)\). So we have
Furthermore, since \(\Psi(t)\geq t^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}-1}\), we have
It follows from (3.11), for any \(v_{1}(t)\in E\)
namely, the operator \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\) is uniformly bounded.
On the other hand, let \(\Omega\subset E\) be bounded. As the function \(H_{1}(t,s), G(\beta_{1},t,s)\) is uniformly continuous on \([0,1]\times[0,1]\), \(D_{\lambda^{*}}(\Omega)\) is equicontinuous. By the Arzela-Ascoli theorem, we have \(D_{\lambda ^{*}}:E\rightarrow E\) is completely continuous. Thus by using the Schauder fixed point theorem, \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\) has at least one fixed point x such the \(x=D_{\lambda^{*}}x\).
Now we prove
Since x is a fixed point of \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\), by (3.18) and (3.23), we have
From (3.9), (3.16), (3.24), and noting that x is a fixed point of \(D_{\lambda^{*}}\), we also have
Let \(z(t)=\varphi_{p_{1}}(-D^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}}\Phi)(t)-\varphi _{p_{1}}(-D^{\alpha_{1}-\gamma_{1}}x)(t)\), then
In view of Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3, we obtain
i.e.
Noticing that \(\varphi_{p_{1}}\) is monotone increasing, we have
i.e.
It follows from Lemma 2.6 and (3.26)
Then we have \(x(t)\leq\Phi(t)\) on \([0,1]\). In the same way we also have \(x(t)\geq\Psi(t)\) on \([0,1]\). So
Consequently, \(F(x(t))=f_{1}(I^{\gamma_{1}}x(t),x(t),Ax(t)), t\in[0,1]\). Hence \(x(t)\) is a positive solution of the problem (2.6). Finally, by (3.27) and \(\Phi,\Psi\in P\), we have
Then by Lemmas 2.5
where \(v_{2}(t)=\int_{0}^{1}H_{2}(t,s) (\int_{0}^{1}G(\beta_{2},s,\tau )f_{2}(\tau,I^{\gamma_{1}}x(\tau))\,d\tau )^{q_{2}-1}\,ds\) is the unique positive solution of system (1.1).
Since the process is similar to (3.4) and (3.5) we obtain
and
i.e.
 □
Example
Consider the following boundary value problem:
Let \(\alpha_{1}=\frac{4}{3},\alpha_{2}=\frac{3}{2},\beta_{1}=\frac{5}{2},\beta _{2}=\frac{11}{4},\gamma_{1}=\frac{1}{6},\gamma_{2}=\frac{1}{4}, p_{1}=3,p_{2}=4,\omega_{1}=\frac{5}{6},\omega_{2}=\frac{7}{4},\xi_{1}=2,\xi _{2}=5,\eta_{1}=\frac{1}{3},\eta_{2}=\frac{1}{2}\).
First, we have
and \(q_{1}=\frac{3}{2},q_{2}=\frac{4}{3}\), then \((s_{0}),(s_{1})\), and \((s_{2})\) hold.
Second, let
and for all \(r\in(0,1)\), \((x,y,z)\in(0,+\infty)^{3}\), \((t,x)\in(0,1)\times (0,+\infty)\),
which implies that (H1), (H2) hold. On the other hand, by direct calculation, we have \(f_{1}(1,1,1)=3\neq0\), and then
Thus
Hence, (H3) holds. Then by Theorem 3.1 there exists a constant \(\lambda^{*}>0\) such that for any \(\lambda\in (\lambda^{*},+\infty)\), the BVP (1.1) has at least one positive solution \((u_{1}(t),u_{2}(t))\).
References
Wang, Y, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Positive solutions for a nonlocal fractional differential equation. Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 74, 3599-3605 (2011)
Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: The uniqueness of positive solution for a singular fractional differential system involving derivatives. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18, 1400-1409 (2013)
Zhang, X, Liu, L, Benchawan, W, Wu, Y: The eigenvalue for a class of singular p-Laplacian fractional differential equations involving the Riemann-Stieltjes integral boundary condition. Appl. Math. Comput. 235, 412-422 (2014)
Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Existence results for multiple positive solutions of nonlinear higher order perturbed fractional differential equations with derivatives. Appl. Math. Comput. 219, 1420-1433 (2012)
Zhang, X, Wu, Y, Caccetta, L: Nonlocal fractional order differential equations with changing-sign singular perturbation. Appl. Math. Model. 39, 6543-6552 (2015)
Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y, Wiwatanapataphee, B: The spectral analysis for a singular fractional differential equation with a signed measure. Appl. Math. Comput. 257, 252-263 (2015)
Cui, Y, Liu, L, Zhang, X, Wu, Y: Uniqueness and existence of positive solutions for singular differential systems with coupled integral boundary value problems. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 340487 (2013)
Wang, Y, Liu, L, Zhang, X, Wu, Y: Positive solutions for \((n - 1, 1)\)-type singular fractional differential system with coupled integral boundary conditions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 142391 (2014)
Ahmas, B, Niteo, JJ: Existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations with three-pint boundary conditions. Appl. Math. Comput. 58(9), 1838-1843 (2009)
Su, X: Boundary value problem for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 22(1), 64-69 (2009)
Zhang, Y, Bai, Z, Feng, T: Existence results for a coupled system of nonlinear fractional three-point boundary value problems at resonance. Appl. Math. Comput. 61(4), 1032-1047 (2011)
Goodrich, CS: Existence of a positive solution to systems of differential equations of fractional order. Appl. Math. Comput. 62(3), 1251-1268 (2011)
Wei, Z, Li, Q, Che, J: Initial value problems for fractional differential equations involving Riemann-Liouville sequential fractional derivative. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 367(1), 260-272 (2010)
Li, F, Sun, J, Jia, M: Monotone iterative method for second-order three-point boundary value problem with upper and lower solutions in the reversed order. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 4840-4847 (2011)
Henderson, J: Existence of multiple solutions for second order boundary value problems. J. Differ. Equ. 166, 443-454 (2000)
Bai, Z, Lv, H: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 311, 495-505 (2005)
Wang, G: Explicit iteration and unbounded solutions for fractional integral boundary value problem on an infinite interval. Appl. Math. Lett. 17, 1-7 (2015)
Zhang, X, Liu, L, Wu, Y: The uniqueness of positive solution for a fractional order model of turbulent flow in a porous medium. Appl. Math. Lett. 37, 26-33 (2014)
Acknowledgements
The author sincerely thanks the editor and reviewers for their valuable suggestions and useful comments to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The author declares to have no competing interests.
Author’s contributions
The whole work was carried out by the author.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
He, Y. The eigenvalue problem for a coupled system of singular p-Laplacian differential equations involving fractional differential-integral conditions. Adv Differ Equ 2016, 209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0930-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0930-3
MSC
- 34B15
Keywords
- upper and lower solutions
- p-Laplacian operator
- eigenvalue
- fractional differential equation