- Research
- Open Access
- Published:
Certain fractional q-symmetric integrals and q-symmetric derivatives and their application
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2016, Article number: 222 (2016)
Abstract
The q-symmetric analogs of Cauchy’s formulas for multiple integrals are obtained. We introduce the concepts of the fractional q-symmetric integrals and fractional q-symmetric derivatives and discuss some of their properties. By using some properties of q-symmetric fractional integrals and fractional difference operators, we study a boundary value problem with nonlocal boundary conditions.
1 Introduction
The q-quantum calculus is an old subject that was first developed by Jackson [1, 2]. It plays an important role in several fields of physics, such as cosmic strings and black holes [3], conformal quantum mechanics [4], nuclear and high energy physics [5], and so on. As a survey of this calculus we refer to [6]. Starting from the q-analog of cauchy formula [7], Al-Salam started the fitting of the concept of q-fractional calculus. After that he [8, 9] and Agarwal [10] continued by studying certain q-fractional integrals and derivatives. Recently, perhaps due to the explosion in research within the fractional calculus setting, new developments in this theory of fractional q-difference calculus were made, specifically, q-analogs of the integral and differential fractional operators properties such as the q-Laplace transform, and q-Taylor’s formula [11, 12]. More recently, the authors in [13, 14] studied the problems of q-fractional initial value and approximation solutions by means of the generalized type of the q-Mittag-Leffler function introduced. Baleanu and Agarwal [15] established some inequalities involving the Saigo fractional q-integral operator in the theory of quantum calculus. There are also many papers dealing with the existence of solutions for q-fractional boundary value problems (see, e.g., [16–23]).
The q-symmetric quantum calculus has proven to be useful in several fields, in particular in quantum mechanics [24]. As noticed in [25], consistently with the q-deformed theory, the standard q-symmetric integral must be generalized to the basic integral defined. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge there are no results available in the literature introducing basic definitions for fractional q-symmetric integrals and fractional q-symmetric derivatives. The basic theory of q-symmetric quantum calculus needs to be explored. The object of this paper is to define a fractional q-symmetric operator corresponding to the q-symmetric analog of \(\int_{0}^{x}f(\tau)\,\widetilde{d}_{q}\tau\). Besides this we shall investigate the fundamental properties of this operator. A study of these fractional q-symmetric operators is expected to be of great importance in the development of the q-function theory, which plays an important role in combinatory analysis.
2 The q-symmetric analogs of Cauchy’s formulas
For a real parameter \(q\in\mathbb{R}^{+}\backslash\{1\}\), we introduce a q-real number \(\overline{[a]}_{q}\) by
For a nonnegative integer n, let
Also, the q-symmetric analog of the power \((a-b)^{k}\) is
Their natural expansions to reals are
The q-symmetric gamma function is defined by
Obviously,
The basic q-symmetric integrals are defined through the relations
The q-symmetric derivative of a function \(f(x)\) is defined as
and the q-symmetric derivatives of higher order as
As for q-symmetric derivatives, we can define an operator \(\widetilde {I}^{n}_{q}\) by
For operators defined in this manner, the following is valid:
The formula for q-symmetric integration by parts is
Using (2.1) and (2.4), we may obtain the very useful examples of the q-symmetric derivatives of the next functions:
Next, we consider the form of the multiple q-symmetric integration as follows:
Theorem 1
The form of the multiple q-symmetric integration (2.9) is equality to
where
Proof
We prove (2.10) by using mathematical induction.
If \(n=1\), \((\widetilde{I}^{1}_{q,0}f)(x)=\int^{x}_{0}f(\tau)\,\widetilde{d}_{q}\tau\).
If \(n=2\), we have
We see that (2.10) holds.
Next, suppose that Theorem 1 holds for \(n=k\). We consider the case \(n=k+1\).
By (2.5), we have
On the other hand
Since
We may see that (2.10) holds when \(n=k+1\). □
3 The \(\widetilde{I}_{q,0}^{\alpha}\) operator
We now introduce the fractional q-symmetric integral operator,
where
To prove the semigroup property of the fractional q-symmetric integral, we need Lemma 1.
Lemma 1
[12]
For \(\mu,\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{R}^{+}\), the following identity is valid:
where
Theorem 2
Let \(\alpha,\beta\in\mathbb{R}^{+}\). The fractional q-symmetric integration has the following semigroup property:
Proof
Next, we denote \(q^{2}=\overline{q}\), then
and
Using Lemma 1, we obtain
Thus
□
Theorem 3
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}^{+}\), the following identity is valid:
Proof
Using the q-symmetric integration by parts and (2.8), we obtain
□
4 The fractional q-symmetric derivative of Riemann-Liouville type
We define the fractional q-symmetric derivative of Riemann-Liouville type of a function \(f(x)\) by
Here \([\alpha]\) denotes the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Theorem 4
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\setminus \mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following is valid:
Proof
We consider three cases. For \(\alpha\leq-1\), according to Theorem 3 and (2.6), we have
In the case \(-1<\alpha<0\), we obtain
For \(\alpha>0\), we get
□
Theorem 5
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following is valid:
Proof
Let us consider two cases. For \(\alpha<0\),
If \(\alpha>0\), there exists \(l\in\mathbb{N}_{0}\), such that \(\alpha\in(l,l+1)\). Then applying a similar procedure, we get
□
Theorem 6
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following is valid:
Proof
□
Theorem 7
Let \(\alpha\in(0,1)\). Then
Proof
Let \(A(x)=(\widetilde{I}_{q,0}^{\alpha}\widetilde{D}_{q,0}^{\alpha}f)(x)-f(x)\).
Apply \(\widetilde{D}_{q,0}^{\alpha}\) to both sides of the above expression, and using Theorem 6, we get
On the other hand,
Using the above form and according to (3.1), (4.1), we obtain
Hence \(A(x)=Kx^{\alpha-1}\). □
Theorem 8
Let \(\alpha\in(N-1,N]\). Then for some constants \(c_{i}\in\mathbb{R},i=1,2,\ldots,N\), the following equality holds:
Proof
By Theorem 3 and Theorem 7, we have
□
5 The fractional q-symmetric derivative of Caputo type
If we change the order of operators, we can introduce another type of fractional q-derivative.
The fractional q-symmetric derivative of Caputo type is
Here \([\alpha]\) denotes the smallest integer greater than or equal to α.
Theorem 9
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{N}_{0}\), and \(x>0\), the following is valid:
Proof
Clearly, (5.2) holds for \(\alpha=-1\). Next, we will consider three cases.
(i) \(\alpha<-1\), according to (5.1), (2.8), and (2.6), we have
(ii) \(-1<\alpha\leq0\), we obtain
(iii) \(\alpha>0\), we assume \(\alpha=n+\varepsilon, n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, 0<\varepsilon<1\), then \(\alpha+1\in(n+1,n+2)\), so we obtain
□
Theorem 10
For \(\alpha\in\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{N}_{0}\), and \(x>0\), the following is valid:
Proof
We will consider two cases.
(i) \(\alpha<0\), using Theorem 3, (5.1), (2.6), and (2.8), we obtain
By Theorem 9, the required equalities are valid both for \(\alpha\leq-1\) and \(-1<\alpha<0\).
(ii) \(\alpha>0\), we assume \(\alpha=n+\varepsilon, n\in\mathbb{N}_{0}, 0<\varepsilon<1\), then \(\alpha+1\in(n+1,n+2)\), by Theorem 3, (5.1), (2.6), and (2.8), we obtain
□
Theorem 11
Let \(\alpha\in(N-1,N]\). Then for some constants \(c_{i}\in\mathbb{R},i=0,1,\ldots,N-1\), the following equality holds:
Proof
By (5.1), (2.6), and (2.7), we have
□
6 The application
In this section, we deal with the following nonlocal q-symmetric integral boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-symmetric derivatives equations:
where \(q\in(0,1), 1<\alpha\leq2, 0<\beta\leq2, 0<\eta<1\), and \(\mu>0\) is a parameter, \(\widetilde{D}_{q,0}^{\alpha}\) is the q-symmetric derivative of Riemann-Liouville type of order α, \(f:[0,1]\times \mathbb{R}^{+}\longrightarrow\mathbb{R}^{+}\) is continuous.
We give the corresponding Green’s function of the boundary value problem and its properties. By using the Krasnoselskii fix point theorem, an existence result of positive solutions to the above boundary value problem is enunciated.
For convenience, we need some preliminaries.
Let \(q^{2}=\overline{q}\), then by (2.2), we have
The basic q-integrals are defined by
Definition 1
([23] (q-Beta function))
For any \(x,y>0\), \(B_{q}(x,y)=\int_{0}^{1}t^{(x-1)}(1-qt)^{(y-1)}\,d_{q}t\). Recall that
Therefore,
Lemma 2
For \(\lambda\in(-1,\infty)\), the following is valid:
Proof
(i) For \(\lambda\neq0\), according to (3.1), we have
Let \(q^{2}=\overline{q}\), by (2.3), (6.3), (6.4), and Definition 1, we get
Hence, we obtain the required formula for \(\widetilde{I}^{\alpha }_{q,0}x^{(\lambda)}\) when \(\lambda\neq0\).
If \(\lambda= 0\), then using (2.8), we have
(ii) By (i) and (4.1) and (2.7), we get
□
Lemma 3
Let \(M=\widetilde{\Gamma}_{q}(\alpha+\beta)-\mu\eta^{\alpha+\beta-1} q^{\binom{\beta}{2}+(\alpha-1)\beta}\widetilde{\Gamma}_{q}(\alpha)>0\). Then, for a given \(y\in C[0,1]\), the unique solution of the boundary value problem
subject to the boundary condition
is given by
where
Proof
In view of Theorem 8, we have
for some constant \(c_{1},c_{2}\in\mathbb{R}\). Since \(u(0)=0\), we have \(c_{2}=0\).
Using Lemma 2, Theorem 2, we have
From the boundary condition \(u(1)=\mu\widetilde{I}_{q,0}^{\beta}u(\eta)\), we get
Hence
□
According to the property of being non-increasing of \(\overline {(t-s)}^{(\alpha)}\) on s, we may easily obtain Lemma 4 and Lemma 5 as follows.
Lemma 4
The functions \(g(t,s)\) and \(H(\eta,s)\) satisfy the following properties:
-
(i)
\(g(t,s)\geq0, g(t,s)\leq g(s,s), 0\leq t,s\leq1\).
-
(ii)
\(H(\eta,s)\geq0,0\leq s\leq1\).
Lemma 5
The function \(G(t,s)\) satisfies the following properties:
-
(i)
G is a continuous function and \(G(t,s)\geq 0,(t,s)\in[0,1]\times[0,1]\).
-
(ii)
There exists a positive function \(\rho\in C((0,1),(0,+\infty))\) such that \(\max_{0\leq t\leq1}G(t,s)\leq g(s,s)+\frac{\mu}{M}H(\eta,s)=:\rho(s), s\in(0,1)\).
Lemma 6
(Krasnoselskii)
Let \(\mathbb{E}\) be a Banach space, and let \(P\subset\mathbb{E} \) be a cone. Assume \(\Omega_{1},\Omega_{2}\) are open subsets of \(\mathbb{E} \) with \(\theta\in\Omega_{1}\subset\overline{\Omega}_{1}\subset\Omega_{2}\), and let \(T:P\cap(\overline{\Omega}_{2}\setminus\Omega_{1})\longrightarrow P\) be a completely continuous operator such that
Then T has at least one fixed point in \(P\cap(\overline{\Omega}_{2}\setminus\Omega_{1})\).
Let \(X=C[0,1]\) be a Banach space endowed with norm \(\| u\|_{X}=\max_{0\leq t\leq1}|u(t)|\). Define the cone \(P\subset\{u\in X: u(t)\geq0,0\leq t\leq1\}\).
Define the operator \(T: P\longrightarrow X\) as follows:
It follows from the non-negativeness and continuity of G and f that the operator \(T: P\longrightarrow X\) satisfies \(T(P)\subset P\) and is completely continuous.
Theorem 12
Let \(f(t,u)\) be a nonnegative continuous function on \([0,1]\times\mathbb{R}^{+}\). In addition, we assume that:
- (H1):
-
There exists a positive constant \(r_{1}\) such that
$$f(t,u)\geq\kappa r_{1},\quad \textit{for } (t,u)\in[\tau_{1}, \tau_{2}]\times[0,r_{1}], $$where \(\tau_{1}=q^{m_{3}},\tau_{2}=q^{m_{4}}\) with \(m_{3},m_{4}\in\mathbb{N}_{0},m_{3}>m_{4}>0\), and
$$\kappa\geq\biggl(q^{-1} \int_{q\tau_{1}}^{q\tau _{2}}\biggl(g(s,s)+\frac{\mu s^{\alpha-1}}{M}H(\eta,s)\biggr)\,\widetilde{d}_{q}s \biggr)^{-1}. $$ - (H2):
-
There exists a positive constant \(r_{2}\) with \(r_{2}>r_{1}\) such that
$$f(t,u)\leq L r_{2}, \quad\textit{for } (t,u)\in[0,1] \times[0,r_{2}], $$where
$$L= \biggl( \int_{0}^{1}\biggl(\frac{q^{\binom{\alpha}{2}} \overline{(1-s)}^{(\alpha-1)}}{\widetilde{\Gamma }_{q}(\alpha)}+ \frac{\mu}{M}H(\eta,s)\biggr)\,\widetilde{d}_{q}s \biggr)^{-1}. $$
Then the boundary value problem (6.1), (6.2) has at least one positive solution \(u_{0}\) satisfying \(0< r_{1}\leq\| u_{0}\|_{X}\leq r_{2}\).
Proof
By Lemma 4, we obtain \(\max_{0\leq t\leq1}g(t,s)=g(s,s)\). Let \(\Omega_{1}=\{u\in X:\| u\|_{X}< r_{1}\}\). For any \(u\in X\cap\partial\Omega_{1}\), according to (H1), we have
Let \(\Omega_{2}=\{u\in X:\| u\|_{X}< r_{2}\}\). For any \(u\in X\cap\partial\Omega_{2}\), by (H2), we have
Now, an application of Lemma 6 concludes the proof. □
It is hoped that our work will provide motivation for further results for fractional q-symmetric quantum calculus.
References
Jackson, FH: On q-functions and a certain difference operator. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 46, 253-281 (1908)
Jackson, FH: On q-definite integrals. Q. J. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 193-203 (1910)
Strominger, A: Information in black hole radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743-3746 (1993)
Youm, D: q-Deformed conformal quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. D 62, 095009 (2000)
Lavagno, A, Swamy, PN: q-Deformed structures and nonextensive statistics: a comparative study. Physica A 305(1-2), 310-315 (2002)
Ernst, T: The History of q-calculus and New Method. (Licentiate Thesis), U.U.D.M. Report (2000) http://math.uu.se/thomas/Lics.pdf
Al-Salam, WA: q-Analogues of Cauchy’s formula. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 17, 182-184 (1952-1953)
Al-Salam, WA, Verma, A: A fractional Leibniz q-formula. Pac. J. Math. 60, 1-9 (1975)
Al-Salam, WA: Some fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 15, 135-140 (1969)
Agrawal, RP: Certain fractional q-integrals and q-derivatives. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 66, 365-370 (1969)
Atici, FM, Eloe, PW: Fractional q-calculus on a time scale. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 14(3), 333-344 (2007)
Rajković, PM, Marinković, SD, Stanković, MS: Fractional integrals and derivatives in q-calculus. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 1(1), 311-323 (2007)
Abdeljawad, T, Benli, B, Baleanu, D: A generalized q-Mittag-Leffler function by q-Caputo fractional linear equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 546062 (2012)
Abdeljawad, T, Baleanu, D: Caputo q-fractional initial value problems and a q-analogue Mittag-Leffler function. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16, 4682-4688 (2011)
Baleanu, D, Agarwal, P: Certain inequalities involving the fractional q-integral operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 371274 (2014)
Zhang, L, Baleanu, D, Wang, G: Nonlocal boundary value problem for nonlinear impulsive \(q(k)\)-integrodifference equation. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, 478185 (2014)
Ferreira, RAC: Positive solutions for a class of boundary value problems with fractional q-differences. Comput. Math. Appl. 61(2), 367-373 (2011)
Ferreira, RAC: Nontrivial solutions for fractional q-difference boundary value problems. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 70 (2010)
El-Shahed, M, Al-Askar, FM: Positive solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equation. ISRN Math. Anal. 2011, 385459 (2011)
Ahmad, B, Alsaedi, A, Ntouyas, SK: A study of second-order q-difference equations with boundary conditions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 35 (2012)
Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ: On nonlocal boundary value problems of nonlinear q-difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, 81 (2012)
Zhou, W-X, Liu, H-Z: Existence solutions for boundary value problem of nonlinear fractional q-difference equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2013, 113 (2013)
Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ, Alsaedi, A, Al-Hutami, H: Existence of solutions for nonlinear fractional q-difference integral equations with two fractional orders and nonlocal four-point boundary conditions. J. Franklin Inst. 351, 2890-2909 (2014)
Lavagno, A: Basic-deformed quantum mechanics. Rep. Math. Phys. 64, 79-88 (2009)
Brito Da Cruz, AMC, Martins, N: The q-symmetric variational calculus. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 2241-2250 (2012)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the referee for invaluable comments and insightful suggestions. This work was supported by NSFC project (No. 11161049, 11361066).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CH, MS and YJ worked together in the derivation of the mathematical results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, M., Jin, Y. & Hou, C. Certain fractional q-symmetric integrals and q-symmetric derivatives and their application. Adv Differ Equ 2016, 222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0947-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0947-7
MSC
- 26A33
- 34B15
Keywords
- fractional q-symmetric integrals
- fractional q-symmetric derivatives
- boundary value problem