 Research
 Open access
 Published:
The deltashock wave for the two variables of a class of Temple system
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2018, Article number: 250 (2018)
Abstract
We investigate the Riemann problem for onedimensional Temple class, obtain the Riemann solutions containing deltashock wave, and discover that each variable of this system contains the Dirac delta function in different region. By the interaction of the deltashock wave with the elementary waves we present the generalized Riemann problem for this system and construct the global solutions. By studying the limits of the solutions as perturbed parameter ε approaches zero we observe that the Riemann solutions are stable for such perturbations of the initial data.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we are concerned with the conservation laws
where \(u\geq0\) and \(v\geq0\). By introducing the function \(\phi (u,v)=uv\) system (1.1) can be derived directly from the Temple system
System (1.2) plays a key role in many engineering applications such as the enhanced oil recovery [33] and the theory of elasticity [11]. If \(\phi(u,v)=\phi(uv)\), then this system can also be seen as a symmetric Keyfitz–Kranzer system [11, 27]; also see [15]. In this case, we can see the corresponding Riemann problem introduced by Shen [27]. For the Temple system, its chock curves coincide with rarefaction wave curves in the phase plane [33, 34]. For the related results on Temple systems, we refer to [1, 2] and the references therein.
Many studies of system (1.2) have been delivered from various aspects. Tan, Zhang, and Zheng [32] studied a reduced onedimensional system and established the corresponding Riemann solutions. Moreover, they obtained the existence, uniqueness, and stability of deltashock waves. In fact, setting \(\phi (u,v)=u\), we can obtain the reduced system in [32]. Recently, the nonlinear chromatography
has been extensively studied by many researchers [5, 8, 38, 39]. By the change of the coordinates and letting \(a_{1}=a_{2}\), system (1.3) can be derived from the nonlinear chromatography system in [16, 17]. In addition, system (1.3) can also be obtained by setting \(\phi(u,v)=1+\frac{1}{1u+v}\) in (1.2); see [35, 40]. There is an important phenomenon that the deltashocktype solutions occur in two component for these systems.
The deltashock wave is a kind of nonclassical nonlinear waves in which at least one state variable becomes a singular measure; see [4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12–14, 19–29, 31, 32, 37, 40] and the references therein.
The motivation for studying system (1.1) comes from the fact that the deltashocktype solutions occur in two components. Moreover, Yang and Zhang [38, 39] assumed that \(\phi(u,v)=\phi(au+bv)\) is a given smooth function satisfying \(a^{2}+b^{2}\neq0\) or \(\phi(u,v)=\phi(\alpha u,\alpha v)\), \(\alpha>0\), and constructed the corresponding Riemann solutions.
Based on these two aspects, we first consider the Riemann problem for system (1.1) with the initial data
where \(u_{\pm}\geq0\) and \(v_{\pm}\geq0\) are some constants. With the help of the characteristic analysis, we discover that there exists the deltashocktype solution for (1.1) and (1.4). Different from the nonlinear chromatography system, there does not exist a deltashocktype solution for both two components \((u,v)\) in the plane, that is,

(1)
when \(u_{}>0\), \(v_{}>0\) and \(u_{+}=0\), \(v_{+}>0\), there exists a deltashock wave for the component v;

(2)
when \(u_{}>0\), \(v_{}>0\) and \(u_{+}>0\), \(v_{+}=0\), there exists a deltashock wave for the component u.
Moreover, to investigate the stability of the Riemann solution, we consider the initial value problem with three pieces of constant states
where \(u_{i}\geq0\), \(v_{i}\geq0\), \(i=\pm\), m, and \(\varepsilon> 0\) is arbitrarily small. The data (1.5) is a perturbation of the Riemann initial data (1.4). By discussing the interactions of δshock and elementary waves, we demonstrate whether the Riemann solutions of (1.1) and (1.4) are the limits of the solutions of (1.1) and (1.5) as \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\); see also [18, 28, 36] and the references therein. In addition, we refer the readers to the monograph of Chang and Hsiao [3] or [30] for the work on interactions of elementary waves and the stability of the Riemann solutions.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In Sect. 2, the Riemann solutions to system (1.1) are constructed, and the existence of the nonclassical solutions, δshock waves, is analyzed. In Sect. 3, we consider the initial value problem with three pieces of constant states. The global solutions are constructed. Moreover, we obtain that the solutions of the perturbed initial value problem converge to the corresponding Riemann solutions as ε approaches zero. Finally, we present the conclusions.
2 Solutions to the Riemann problem
In this section, we discuss Riemann solutions of (1.1) with initial data (1.4).
By calculation we can obtain that the eigenvalues of (1.1) are
with the corresponding righteigenvectors
It is easy to see that \(\nabla\lambda_{1}\cdot r_{1}=0\) and \(\nabla \lambda_{2}\cdot r_{2}\neq0\), where ∇ denotes the gradient with respect to \((u,v)\). Hence \(\lambda_{1}\) is linearly degenerate, \(\lambda_{2}\) is genuinely nonlinear, and system (1.1) is nonstrictly hyperbolic for \(uv=0\). It is easy to obtain that the Riemann invariants of system (1.1) can be taken as
Since equations (1.1) and the Riemann data are invariant under uniform stretching of coordinates
we consider the selfsimilar solutions of (1.1) and (1.4)
Then the Riemann problem becomes a boundary value problem of ordinary differential equations
with
For smooth solutions, equations (2.4) can be rewritten as
It follows from (2.5) that, besides the constant solution, it provides a continuous solution of (2.5) of the form \((u,v)(\xi)\).
Given a left state \((u_{},v_{})\), the possible states which can be connected to \((u_{},v_{})\) on the right by a rarefaction wave lie on a curve given as follows:
For a bounded discontinuous solutions, the Rankine–Hugoniot conditions
hold, where and in what follows, we use the notation \([h]=h_{+}h_{}\) with \(h_{}\) and \(h_{+}\) the values of a function h on the left and righthand sides of the discontinuity curve, respectively, and σ is the velocity of the discontinuity. So, we obtain from (2.7) that
which gives \((u_{+}v_{}u_{}v_{+})=0\) or \((u_{+}v_{+}u_{}v_{})=0\). Thus, for a left state \((u_{},v_{})\), \((u_{+}v_{}u_{}v_{+})=0\), and the Lax entropy conditions imply that the possible states can be connected to \((u_{},v_{})\) on the right by a shock wave satisfying
For this system (1.1), we can see that the shock wave curves coincide with the rarefaction wave curves.
If \((u_{+}v_{+}u_{}v_{})=0\), then \(u_{+}v_{+}=u_{}v_{}\). Since the first characteristic \(\lambda_{1}=uv\) is linearly degenerate, this means that it is a contact discontinuity. Then the possible states that can be connected to \((u_{},v_{})\) on the right by a contact discontinuity lie on the curve
To seek the Riemann solutions based on the value of the left state \((u_{},v_{})\), we divide the phase plane \(I=\{(u,v): u\geq0, v\geq0\}\) into three parts: \(\mathcal{A}=\{u>0 \mbox{ and } v>0\}\), \(\mathcal {B}=\{u=0, v\neq0\}\cup\{v=0,u\neq0\}\), and \(\mathcal{C}=\{u=0, v=0\}\).
Case 1: \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\). In this case, we draw three curves (2.6), (2.9), and (2.10) from the point \((u_{},v_{})\) by R, S, and J, respectively. Obviously, the curve J has asymptotes \(u=0\) and \(v=0\). So, we divide the phase plane into six domains: \(\mbox{I} \cup\mbox{II} \cup\mbox{III} \cup\mbox{IV} \cup \mathcal{B} \cup\mathcal{C}\); see Fig. 1. Hence we divide this case to four subcases as follows.
Case 1.1: \((u_{+},v_{+})\in \mbox{I or II}\). The Riemann solutions can be described as
where and in what follows, “+” means “followed by”, denotes the state \((u_{},v_{})\), and the state \((u_{*},v_{*})\) is determined by
which gives
Moreover, the rarefaction wave R can be expressed as follows:
Case 1.2: \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\) III or IV. We can obtain that the corresponding Riemann solutions are
where the intermediate state \((u_{*},v_{*})\) is described by (2.13), and the shock wave S is expressed as follows:
Case 1.3: \((u_{+},v_{+})=(0,0)\in\mathcal{C}\). The Riemann solutions are
where the speed of the shock wave S is
Case 1.4:. \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{B}\). In this case, we can see that
which implies that the solutions cannot be constructed as before. Hence the Riemann solutions containing a weighted δmeasure supported on a line should be constructed to establish the existence.
To define the measure solutions, we introduce the following definitions.
Definition 2.1
A pair of \((u,v)\) constitutes a solution of (1.1) in the sense of distributions if
for all test functions \(\varphi(t,x)\in C_{0}^{\infty}(R_{+}\times R)\).
Definition 2.2
A twodimensional weighted δmeasure \(\omega(s)\delta_{\Gamma }\) supported on a smooth curve \(\Gamma=\{(t(s),x(s)): a< s< b\}\) is defined by
for all test functions \(\varphi(t,x)\in C_{0}^{\infty}(R\times R)\).
Definition 2.3
A pair of \((u,v)\) is called a deltashock wave solution of (1.1) if it is represented in the form
or
and satisfies Definition 2.1, where \((u_{l},v_{l})\), \((u_{r},v_{r})\) are piecewise smooth bounded solutions of (1.1), \(\omega (t)\in C^{1}[0,+\infty)\), \(\delta(\cdot)\) is the standard Dirac measure supported on the curve \(x=x(t)\), and \(\omega(t)\) is the weight of the deltashock wave on the state variable u or v.
Now, we consider the case \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\) and \((0,v_{+})\in \mathcal{B}\). Similarly, we also describe the other case \((u_{},v_{})\in \mathcal{A}\) and \((u_{+},0)\in\mathcal{B}\).
Following [4, 5, 22, 27, 38, 39], we claim that (2.22) is a deltashock wave solution of (1.1) in the sense of distributions if it satisfies the following generalized Rankine–Hugoniot condition:
with
In addition to the generalized Rankine–Hugoniot condition, the discontinuity must satisfy the deltashock wave entropy condition (2.19), which means that all the characteristic lines on both sides of the discontinuity are not outcoming.
Case 2. \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{B}\). Here, we only consider the case \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{B}\) and \(u_{}=0\). As for the other case \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{B}\) and \(v_{}=0\), we can obtain the same results and omit the details. We divide this case into two subcases; see Fig. 2.
Case 2.1. \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{B}\cup\mathcal{C}\). The corresponding Riemann solutions are expressed by
where the speed of the contact discontinuity \(\sigma_{J}=0\); see Fig. 3.
Case 2.2. \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{A}\). The Riemann solutions are constructed as
where the speed of J vanishes. The J and R are formed as a composite wave; see Fig. 4.
So, we complete the construction of the Riemann solutions to system (1.1).
3 Interactions of δshock wave with elementary waves
In this section, we consider problem (1.1) and (1.5). We divide this into four cases.
Case 1. shock. This case can be divided into two subcases.
Case 1.1. \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{B}\), \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal {B}\), \((u_{m},v_{m})\in\mathcal{A}\), and \(u_{}=u_{+}=0\) (or \(v_{}=v_{+}=0\)); see Fig. 5.
A composite wave emitting from the point O consists of a contact discontinuity and a rarefaction wave. The Riemann solution is a deltashock wave \(\delta {S_{1}}\), whose speed is \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{m} v_{m}\).
As for the characteristic line OB of rarefaction wave R, we have \(\lambda=\frac{dx}{dt}=3 u_{m} v_{m}\). The rarefaction wave R will overtake the delta shock at some finite time. The intersection point \(B(x,t)\) is determined by
which implies
After the time \(t_{B}\), the δshock interacts with the rarefaction wave R and changes into another new δshock (denoted by \(\delta{S_{2}}\)), which is calculated by
From (3.3) we obtain
from which we have
and conclude that the delta shock \(\delta{S_{2}}\) has the straight line \(\frac{dx}{dt}=0\) as its asymptote, which gives that the delta shock cannot penetrate the rarefaction wave R. For large time, that is, as \(t\rightarrow\infty\), the solution can be expressed as
As \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), we can see that the limit of solution (1.1) and (1.5) is the corresponding Riemann solution in this case.
Case 1.2. \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\), \((u_{m},v_{m})\in\mathcal {A}\), \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{B}\), and \(u_{+}=0\) (or \(v_{+}=0\)). In addition, we assume that \(u_{} v_{}< u_{m} v_{m}\); see Fig. 6.
By case 1.1 we can see that the \(\delta_{AB}\)shock will be overtaken by the rarefaction R and the intersection point \((x_{B},t_{B})\) can be given by (3.2). After the time \(t_{B}\), the δshock begins to interact with the rarefaction wave R, and the δshock can be determined by (3.3). Unlike case 1.1, the δshock will penetrate the R at finite time.
In fact, when the δshock interacts with the R, its speed is \(\sigma_{\delta}=\frac{dx}{dt}=uv\). With the help of (3.3), we have \(\frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}}<0\), which means that \(\sigma_{\delta}\) decelerates in the penetration. In addition, we also have , which implies that the δshock can penetrate R at some point \(C(x_{C},t_{C})\).
From the first equation of (3.3) we have
Combining this equation and (3.4), we have
Meantime, a new Riemann problem is formed, and the Riemann solution is a \(\delta_{{CD}}\)shock with speed \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{i} v_{i}\). It is easy to see that the \(\delta _{{CD}}\)shock is parallel to the contact discontinuity J; see Fig. 6.
Letting \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), the limit of the solution (1.1) and (1.5) is the corresponding Riemann solution.
Case 2. δshock . In this case, \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\), \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{A}\), and \((u_{m},v_{m})\in\mathcal{B}\). We divide this case into two subcases.
Case 2.1. \(u_{} v_{}< u_{+} v_{+}\); see Fig. 7.
The speed of the \(\delta_{{OB}}\)shock is \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{} v_{}\) and that of the contact discontinuity \(J_{{AB}}\) is \(\lambda_{1}=0< u_{} v_{}\). Obviously, the δshock overtakes J at some point \(B(x_{B},t_{B})\), which satisfies
Thus we have
After the point B, the δshock entropy condition (2.19) is not satisfied, a contact discontinuity BC and a shock wave \(\widehat{BD}\) emit from the point B. The contact discontinuity BC is \(J_{{BC}}: xx_{{B}}=u_{} v_{} (tt_{{B}})\) and \(t>t_{{B}}\). The shock \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) will cross the rarefaction wave R with varying speed of propagation during the penetration, which means that the shock \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) is no longer a straight line. Moreover, the shock wave \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) is determined by
Obviously, during the penetration, we have \(\frac{du}{dt}>0\), which implies \(\frac{d^{2} x}{dt^{2}}>0\). Thus, the shock wave curve \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) is concave in the \((x,t)\)plane, as shown in Fig. 7.
From the last two equations of (3.9) we have
which, combined with the first equation of (3.9), gives
Integrating (3.10) over \([0,u_{i}]\) gives
which implies that \(t\rightarrow\infty\) as \(u\rightarrow u_{i}\). So, the shock wave \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) cannot penetrate the rarefaction wave R and has the straight line \(\frac{dx}{dt}=3 u_{i} v_{i}\) as its asymptote.
Moreover, we can obtain that as \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), the limit of the solution (1.1) and (1.5) is the corresponding Riemann solution.
Case 2.2. \(u_{} v_{}>u_{+} v_{+}\); see Fig. 8.
Unlike case 2.1, the shock wave \(S_{{\widehat{BDE}}}\) can penetrate the rarefaction wave at finite time. In fact, integrating (3.10) over \([0,u_{+}]\) yields
where \(u_{+}< u_{i}\). We obtain from (3.12) that, at some time \(t_{{D}}\), the shock wave \(S_{{\widehat{BDE}}}\) penetrate R, where
The shock wave \(S_{{\widehat{BD}}}\) is given by (3.9), where \(0< u\leq u_{+}< u_{i}\) and \(0< v\leq v_{+}< v_{i}\). At the point D, a straight shock \(S_{{DE}}\) emits with speed \(\sigma_{S}=\frac{v_{+}}{u_{+}}(u_{+} ^{2}+u_{i} u_{+}+u_{i}^{2})\).
Thus, for large time, the solutions can be described as
Moreover, as \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), the limit of the solution (1.1) and (1.5) is the corresponding Riemann solution.
Case 3. shock. In this case, we have \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\), \((u_{m},v_{m})\in\mathcal {A}\), \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{B}\), and \(u_{}v_{}>u_{m} v_{m}\); see Fig. 9. Here, we assume that \(u_{+}=0\) and also obtain the same results for the case \(v_{+}=0\).
The propagation speed of the shock \(S_{{OB}}\) is \(\sigma_{\delta }=\frac{v_{m}}{u_{m}}(u_{m}^{2}+u_{m} u_{i}+u_{i}^{2})\), which is greater than that of the deltashock wave \(\delta_{{AB}}\), \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{m} v_{m}\), where \((u_{i},v_{i})\) may be calculated by (2.12), that is,
Then S intersects with the δshock at a point \(B(x_{B},t_{B})\), which is calculated by
A direct calculation leads to
At the point B, a new deltashock wave \(\delta_{{BD}}\) occurs, the propagation speed of which is \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{i} v_{i}\). Meantime, the speed of the contact discontinuity \(J_{{OC}}\) is \(\sigma_{J}=u_{i} v_{i}=u_{}v_{}\), which leads to that it is parallel to the \(\delta_{{BD}}\)shock.
As \(t\rightarrow\infty\), the timeasymptotic solution can be described as
As \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\), the intermediate state \((u_{i},v_{i})\) disappears, whereas \(\delta_{{BD}}\)shock and \(J_{{OC}}\) unify into one deltashock wave since \(\delta_{{BD}}\)shock and \(J_{{OC}}\) propagate with the same speed \(u_{}v_{}\). So the solution tends to the corresponding Riemann solution as \(\varepsilon\rightarrow0\).
Case 4. . In this case, we have \((u_{},v_{})\in\mathcal{A}\), \((u_{m},v_{m})\in \mathcal{B}\), and \((u_{+},v_{+})\in\mathcal{B}\). We can check that the propagating speed of the \(\delta_{{OB}}\)shock \(\sigma_{\delta}=uv_{}\) is greater than that of the contact discontinuity \(J_{{AB}}\), \(\sigma_{J}=0\), which implies that \(\delta _{{S_{1}}}\) will overtake the \(J_{{AB}}\) at some point \(B(x_{{B}},t_{{B}})\), which is expressed by (3.8). They interact with each other and yield a new deltashock wave \(\delta _{S_{2}}\) with the propagating speed \(\sigma_{\delta}=u_{i} v_{i}\); see Fig. 10.
So far, we have finished the discussion on the interactions of the δshock and the elementary waves, and the global solutions for the perturbed initial value problem (1.1) and (1.5) have been constructed. We summarize our results in the following:
Theorem 3.1
The limit of the perturbed Riemann solution of (1.1) and (1.5) is exactly the corresponding Riemann solution of (1.1) and (1.4). The Riemann solution of (1.1) and (1.4) is stable and admissible with respect to such small perturbations of the initial data.
4 Conclusions
In this paper, we discuss the deltashock waves of a class of symmetric nonstrictly hyperbolic conservation law equations in which each variable may contain the Dirac delta function in different regions. This enriches the content of the Temple system. Furthermore, we discuss the interaction of elementary waves, involving the composite wave, which is different from the corresponding contents in [35, 36, 38–40]. In the future, we will focus ourselves on the corresponding twodimensional equations and the related content.
References
Ambrosio, L., Crippa, G., Figalli, A., Spinolo, L.: Some new wellposedness results for continuity and transport equations, and applications to the chromatography system. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 41, 1890–1920 (2009)
Bianchini, S.: Stability of \(L^{\infty}\) solutions for hyperbolic systems with coinciding shocks and rarefactions. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 33, 959–981 (2001)
Chang, T., Hsiao, L.: The Riemann Problem and Interaction of Waves in Gas Dynamics. Pitman Monogr. Surv. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 41. Longman, Harlow (1989)
Chen, G.Q., Liu, H.: Formation of δshock and vacuum states in the vanishing pressure limit of solutions to the Euler equations for isentropic fluids. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 34, 925–938 (2003)
Cheng, H., Yang, H.: Delta shock waves in chromatography equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 380, 475–485 (2011)
Danilov, V.G., Shelkovich, V.M.: Dynamics of propagation and interaction of δshock waves in conservation law systems. J. Differ. Equ. 221, 333–381 (2005)
Danilov, V.G., Shelkovich, V.M.: Deltashock type solution of hyperbolic systems of conservation law systems. Q. Appl. Math. 63, 401–427 (2005)
Guo, L., Pan, L., Yin, G.: The perturbed Riemann problem and delta contact discontinuity in chromatography equations. Nonlinear Anal. 106, 110–123 (2014)
Guo, L., Sheng, W., Zhang, T.: The twodimensional Riemann problem for isentropic Chaplygin gas dynamic system. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 9, 431–458 (2010)
Huang, F., Wang, Z.: Wellposedness for pressureless flow. Commun. Math. Phys. 222, 117–146 (2001)
Keyfitz, B.L., Kranzer, H.C.: A system of nonstrictly hyperbolic conservation laws arising in elasticity. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 72, 219–241 (1980)
Korchinski, D.J.: Solution of a Riemann problem for a system of conservation laws possessing no classical weak solution. Thesis, Adelphi University (1977)
Lai, G., Sheng, W., Zheng, Y.: Simple waves and pressure delta waves for a Chaplygin gas in multidimensions. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 31, 489–523 (2011)
Li, J., Zhang, T., Yang, S.: The TwoDimensional Riemann Problem in Gas Dynamics. Pitman Monographs, vol. 98. Longman, Harlow (1998)
Lu, Y.G.: Existence of global bounded weak solutions to a symmetric system of Keyfitz–Kranzer type. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 13, 235–240 (2012)
Mazzotti, M.: Nonclassical composition fronts in nonlinear chromatography: deltashock. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 7733–7752 (2009)
Mazzotti, M., Tarafder, A., Cornel, J., Gritti, F., Guiochond, G.: Experimental evidence of a deltashock in nonlinear chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1217, 2002–2012 (2010)
Nedeljkov, M., Oberguggenberger, M.: Interactions of delta shock waves in a strictly hyperbolic system of conservation laws. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 344, 1143–1157 (2008)
Nedeljkov, M.: Shadow waves: entropies and interactions for delta and singular shocks. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 197, 489–537 (2010)
Panov, E., Shelkovich, V.M.: δ’shock waves as a new type of solutions to system of conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 228, 49–86 (2006)
Rykov, Yu.G., Sinai, Ya.G., Weinan, E.: Generalized variational principles, global weak solutions and behavior with random initial data for systems of conservation laws arising in adhesion particle dynamics. Commun. Math. Phys. 177, 349–380 (1996)
Shao, Z.: Riemann problem with delta initial data for the isentropic relativistic Chaplygin Euler equations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 67, 66 (2016)
Shao, Z.: The Riemann problem for the relativistic full Euler system with generalized Chaplygin proper energy densitypressure relation. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 69, 44 (2018)
Shelkovich, V.M.: One class of systems of conservation laws admitting deltashocks. In: Hyperbolic Problems: Theory, Numerics and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 667–674 (2012)
Shen, C.: The Riemann problem for the pressureless Euler system with the Coulomblike friction term. IMA J. Appl. Math. 81, 76–99 (2016)
Shen, C.: The Riemann problem for the Chaplygin gas equations with a source term. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 96, 681–695 (2016)
Shen, C.: Delta shock wave solution for a symmetric Keyfitz–Kranzer system. Appl. Math. Lett. 77, 35–43 (2018)
Shen, C., Sun, M.: Formation of delta shocks and vacuum states in the vanishing pressure limit of Riemann solutions to the perturbed Aw–Rascle model. J. Differ. Equ. 249, 3024–3051 (2010)
Sheng, W., Zhang, T.: The Riemann problem for the transportation equations in gas dynamics. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 137, 654 (1999)
Sun, M.: Interaction of elementary waves for the Aw–Rascle model. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 69, 1542–1558 (2009)
Sun, M.: Singular solutions to the Riemann problem for a macroscopic production model. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 97, 916–931 (2017)
Tan, D., Zhang, T., Zheng, Y.: Deltashock waves as limits of vanishing viscosity for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 112, 1–32 (1994)
Temple, B.: Global solution of the Cauchy problem for a class of \(2\times 2\) nonstrictly hyperbolic conservation laws. Adv. Appl. Math. 3, 335–375 (1982)
Temple, B.: Systems of conservation laws with invariant submanifolds. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 280, 781–795 (1983)
Wang, G.: Onedimensional nonlinear chromatography system and deltashock waves. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 64, 1451–1469 (2013)
Wang, G.: The Riemann problem for one dimensional generalized Chaplygin gas dynamics. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 403, 434–450 (2013)
Yang, H.: Riemann problems for a class of coupled hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 159, 447–484 (1999)
Yang, H., Zhang, Y.: New developments of delta shock waves and its applications in systems of conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 252, 5951–5993 (2012)
Yang, H., Zhang, Y.: Delta shock waves with Dirac delta function in both components for systems of conservation laws. J. Differ. Equ. 257, 4369–4402 (2014)
Zhang, Q.: Interactions of delta shock waves and stability of Riemann solutions for nonlinear chromatography equations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 67, 1–14 (2016)
Funding
The work of G.D. Wang was partly supported by the Science Key Project of Education Department of Anhui Province under Grant KJ2018A0517 and the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Anhui Jianzhu University under Grant 2016QD110. J.B. Liu was partially supported by National Science Foundation of China under grant No. 11601006, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under grant No. 2017M621579 and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under grant No. 1701081B. The work of M.J. Hu was partly supported by the Science Project of Education Department of Anhui Province under Grant KJ2018JD21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors carried out the proofs, and the authors conceived of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, G., Liu, JB., Zhao, L. et al. The deltashock wave for the two variables of a class of Temple system. Adv Differ Equ 2018, 250 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201817086
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201817086