 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Analysis of differential equations involving Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator and its applications to reaction–diffusion equations
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2019, Article number: 178 (2019)
Abstract
This manuscript deals with fractional differential equations including Caputo–Fabrizio differential operator. The conditions for existence and uniqueness of solutions of fractional initial value problems is established using fixed point theorem and contraction principle, respectively. As an application, the iterative Laplace transform method (ILTM) is used to get an approximate solutions for nonlinear fractional reaction–diffusion equations, namely the Fitzhugh–Nagumo equation and the Fisher equation in the Caputo–Fabrizio sense. The obtained approximate solutions are compared with other available solutions from existing methods by using graphical representations and numerical computations. The results reveal that the proposed method is most suitable in terms of computational cost efficiency, and accuracy which can be applied to find solutions of nonlinear fractional reaction–diffusion equations.
1 Introduction
Nowadays, the mathematical models involving fractional order derivative were given noticeable importance because they are more accurate and realistic as compared to the classical order models [22, 26, 28]. Motivated by the advancement of fractional calculus, many researchers have focused to investigate the solutions of nonlinear differential equations with the fractional operator by developing quite a few analytical or numerical techniques to find approximate solutions [6, 10, 19, 29, 30]. These differential equations involves several fractional differential operators like Riemann–Liouville, Caputo, Hilfer etc. [4, 15, 32].
However, these operators possess a power law kernel and have limitations in modeling physical problems. To overcome this difficulty, recently an alternate fractional differential operator having a kernel with exponential decay has been introduced by Caputo and Fabrizio [9]. This novel approach of fractional derivative is known as the Caputo–Fabrizio (C–F) operator which has attracted many research scholars due to the fact that it has a nonsingular kernel. Also the C–F operator is most appropriate for modeling some class of realworld problem which follows the exponential decay law. With the passage of time, developing a mathematical model using the C–F fractional order derivative became a remarkable field of research. In recent times, several mathematicians were busy in development and simulation of CFFDE. One can read the articles of the aforementioned derivative to see further characteristics and applications [3, 8, 11, 16,17,18, 20, 25, 34].
In the present study, we analyze the following Caputo–Fabrizio fractional differential equations (CFFDE) to obtain uniqueness and existence criteria of solutions [5, 7, 35]:
Here \({}^{\mathrm{CF}}D^{\gamma }_{t}\) is for the CFFDE. \(f: [0,1] \times \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) is continuous and \(u_{0} \in \mathbb{R}\), \(t \in [0,1]\).
Fractional reaction–diffusion equations have been broadly examined as of lately. These equations emerge normally as description models of numerous evolution processes in various branches of science [12, 21, 33]. Furthermore by continuation to the above literature, we demonstrate the utility of the C–F operator on one and twodimensional reaction–diffusion equations, namely the Fitzhugh–Nagumo (FN) equation and the Fisher equation, respectively given by
where the nonlinear function \(g(u)\) represents the reaction kinetics, \(h(x,t)\) is a source term and β denotes the diffusion coefficient.
By considering \(g(u) = \lambda u^{\alpha }(1u^{\nu })(u\theta)\) and \(h(x,t)=0\), Eqs. (2) and (3) reduce to
If we put \(\lambda =1\), \(\beta =1\), \(\alpha =1\) and \(\nu =1\), then Eq. (4) reduces to a time fractional FN equation which is one of the most significant reaction–diffusion equation, used to display the transmission of nerve driving forces [14]. The mathematical model of population genetics is also described by using the FN equation [1]. Next, if we take \(\lambda =\frac{1}{2}\), \(\beta =1\), \(\alpha =1\), \(\nu =1\) and \(\theta =0\), then Eq. (5) becomes a time fractional Fisher equation in an infinite domain as suggested by Fisher [13] as a model for the spatial transient propagation of a virile gene. In [2], Atangana studied a nonlinear Fisher reaction–diffusion equation.
In [24] Khan et al. used the homotopy analysis method (HAM) to find approximate analytical solutions of fractional reaction–diffusion equations. The residual power series method (RPSM) was applied by Tchier et al. [31] to find a numerical solution of fractional reaction–diffusion equations. The series solutions of reaction–diffusion equations were obtained by Merdan [27] by using a fractional variational iteration method (FVIM). Motivated by this, in the present manuscript, we compute approximate solutions of nonlinear fractional reaction–diffusion equations by using a reliable and efficient approach known as the iterative Laplace transform method (ILTM). The proposed technique is an amalgamation of the Laplace transform and the new iterative method (NIM) proposed by Jafari et al. [23].
In the light of the above examined writing, the present study concentrates on establishing the uniqueness and existence criteria of solutions of the nonlinear CFFDE. Also, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the iterative Laplace transform method by obtaining the approximate solutions and 3D plots of the time fractional reaction–diffusion equations.
2 Preliminaries of fractional calculus
Definition 2.1
([9])
Let \(u\in H^{1}(0,b)\), \(b > 0\), \(0<\gamma <1 \), then the time fractional Caputo–Fabrizio fractional differential operator (CFFDO) is defined as
with a normalization function \(M(\gamma)\) which is depending on \(\gamma \ni M(0)=M(1)=1\).
Definition 2.2
([8])
The CFFDO of order \(0<\gamma <1\) is given by
like the usual Caputo derivative, this new operator gives \({}^{\mathrm{CF}}D^{ \gamma }_{t}u(t)=0\), if u is a constant function.
The main advantage of the Caputo–Fabrizio operator over the old operator of Caputo is that there is no singularity for \(t= s\) in the new kernel.
Definition 2.3
([9])
The Laplace transform for the CFFDO of order \(0<\gamma \leq 1 \) and \(m\in \mathbb{N}\) is given by
In particular, we have
Lemma 2.1
The IVP
has a solution in terms of the integral given by
3 Main results
Prior to expressing and demonstrating the fundamental outcomes, we present the following lemma and notations.
Let \(\mathbb{\mu } = [0, 1]\) and \(C(\mu) \) denote the space of all continuous functions on μ.
Considering the set \(\mathbb{B} = \{u(t) u(t) \in C(\mu)\} \), endowed with the norm \(\Vert u(t) \Vert _{\mathbb{B}}= \max_{t\in \mu } u(t)\), is a Banach space. By Lemma (9), IVP (1) is expressed as an integral equation given by
Let the operator \(T:\mathbb{B} \rightarrow \mathbb{B} \) be defined by
then the fixed point of operator T is equivalent to the solution of IVP (1).
Theorem 3.1
Let \(f: \mu \times R \rightarrow R \) be a continuous function. Assume that at least one of the following conditions is fulfilled:
 (H1):

A nonnegative function \(g(t) \in L[0,1]\) exists, such that \(f(t, x)  \leq g(t) + c_{0}  x ^{\delta }\), where \(c_{0} \geq 0\), \(0 < \delta < 1\).
 (H2):

The function f satisfies \(f(t, x)  \leq c_{0}  x ^{ \delta }\), where \(c_{0} > 0\), \(\delta > 1\). Then IVP (1) has a solution.
Proof
We make use of the Schauder fixed point theorem. For this purpose, assume that condition (H1) is satisfied.
Define \(G = \{ u(t)  u(t) \in \mathbb{B}, \Vert u(t) \Vert _{\mathbb{B}} \leq K, t \in \mu \}\), where \(K \geq \max \{ (2\operatorname{Ac}_{0})^{\frac{1}{1\delta }}, 2l \}\) and
Obviously, in the Banach space \(\mathbb{B}\), G is a ball. Next, we show that T: \(G\rightarrow G\).
For all \(u\in G \), we have
Therefore,
Here \(Tu(t)\) is continuous on μ.
Now, assume that condition (H2) is satisfied. Select \(0< K \leq (\frac{1}{\operatorname{Ac}_{0}} )^{\frac{1}{\delta 1}}\).
Similarly, repeating the above arguments we get
Consequently, we get \(T : G \rightarrow G \).
Obviously, the operator T is continuous because of the continuity of f. □
Further, we set up the complete continuity of the operator T. Let \(R = \max_{t\in \mu } f (t, u(t))\), for any \(u\in G \), let \(t_{1}, t_{2} \in \mu \) be such that \(t_{1} < t_{2}\).
Also, let \(U_{1}=\frac{2(1\gamma)}{(2\gamma)M(\gamma)}\) and \(U_{2}=\frac{2\gamma }{(2\gamma)M(\gamma)}\), then we get
In view of the uniform continuity of the function \((t_{2}t_{1})\) on the interval μ, we see that TG is an equicontinuous set. Also, this function is uniformly bounded as \(TG \subseteq G\); hence T is completely continuous. As a result of Schauder’s fixed point theorem, there exists a solution of IVP (1) in G.
Corollary 3.1
Suppose the function f is continuous and bounded on \(\mu \times \mathbb{R}\), then IVP (1) has a solution.
Proof
As f is continuous and bounded on \(\mu \times \mathbb{R}\), there exists \(L>0\) which satisfies \(f < L \). Let \(g(t) = L\), \(c_{0} = 0 \) in condition (H1) of Theorem 3.1, then IVP (1) has a solution.
Next, we establish the uniqueness criteria for solutions of IVP (1) with the help of Banach contraction principle. □
Theorem 3.2
Let \(f: \mu \times \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} \) be continuous function and let the conditions given below be satisfied:
 (H3):

There exists a nonnegative function \(\eta (t) \in L[0,1] \) which gives
$$ \bigl\vert f(t, x)  f(t, y) \bigr\vert \leq \eta \vert x y \vert , \quad t \in [0,1], $$also the function f satisfies \(f(t, 0) = 0\).
 (H4):

Suppose that \(\sigma = \max_{t\in \mu }  \frac{2(1 \gamma)}{(2\gamma)M(\gamma)} \eta (t) + \frac{2\gamma }{(2\gamma)M(\gamma)}\int _{0}^{t} \eta (\tau)\,d\tau  < 1\), then IVP (1) has a unique solution.
Proof
We denote the operator T by
where \(\phi = u_{0}\frac{2(1\gamma)}{(2\gamma)M(\gamma)}f(0, u _{0})\). For \(u(t) \in \mathbb{B} \), we get
hence, we have
therefore, \(T:\mathbb{B} \rightarrow \mathbb{B}\). Let \(u(t), v(t) \in \mathbb{B}\), then we have
In view of \(\sigma < 1\), T is a contraction. Consequently, T has only one fixed point as a result of Banach contraction principle, hence it gives a solution of IVP (1). □
4 Applications
In this section, we shall propose an algorithm to solve a general nonhomogeneous CFFDE and demonstrate it by solving time fractional FN and Fisher equations.
4.1 Iterative Laplace transform method
We take a general nonhomogeneous CFFDE of the form
with the initial conditions
Here \(f (x,t)\) is a source term, ϕ and ψ are given linear and nonlinear operator, respectively. Applying the Laplace transform (8) on two sides of (14) yields
where
Next, we apply the inverse Laplace transform on (15) then we have
where the term obtained from the source term is denoted by \(\chi (x,t)\). Further, we apply the new iterative method introduced in [10]. We consider the solution as an infinite series given as
since ϕ is linear,
The nonlinear operator ψ is decomposed as
In view of (17), (18) and (19), Eq. (16) is equivalent to
furthermore, we consider the recurrence relation as given by
The pterm approximate solution is given by
4.2 Illustrative examples
The efficiency of ILTM is validated by simulating time fractional reaction–diffusion equations in this section.
Example 4.1
The time fractional Fitzhugh–Nagumo equation is
with initial condition
Here \(x\in \mathbb{R}\), \(\theta \in (0,1)\) and the exact solution of Eq. (26) for \(\gamma =1\) is
Taking the Laplace transform on (8) to (23), we get
Applying the inverse Laplace transform on (24)
In view of Eq. (21), we get
Example 4.2
We consider the time fractional twodimensional Fisher equation
with initial condition
for \(\Delta = \{(x,y): x, y\in [0,1]\} \). The exact solution of Eq. (26) for \(\gamma =1\) is
Applying the Laplace transform on (8) to (26), we get
taking the inverse Laplace transform of (27)
In view of Eq. (21), we get
5 Numerical results and discussion
Figures 1 and 2 show the numerical simulations of three term approximate solutions of (23) for \(\gamma = 1, 0.8\) using ILTM from which one infers that this technique can describe the conduct of said variables precisely for the considered region. The intervals \([10, 10]\) and \([0, 10]\) give the validity region of convergence of solutions for \(\gamma = 1\) and the intervals \([10, 10]\), \([0, 12]\) for \(\gamma = 0.8\). The noninteger order has negligible effect in the dynamics of the FN equation. Also, Figs. 3 and 4 show the numerical simulations of three term approximate solutions of (26) for \(\gamma = 1, 0.8\) and the validity region of convergence of solutions given by intervals \([5, 5]\) and \([0, 10]\) for \(\gamma =1\) and \(\gamma = 0.8\).
Likewise, Tables 1 and 2 display the comparison among approximate solutions of (23) and (26), respectively, using ILTM with known results obtained by RPSM [31] and FVIM [27] for \(\gamma = 1, 0.8\). The numerical values demonstrate that the region of convergence of approximate solutions depend continuously on the time fractional derivative γ. These tables clarify convergence of the approximate solutions to the exact solutions, and as the value of the t decreases the absolute error becomes smaller. Hence, it is observed that the proposed technique is most suitable in terms of computational cost and accuracy for obtaining approximate solutions of nonlinear fractional reaction–diffusion equations.
6 Conclusions
This manuscript presents the existence and uniqueness criteria for nonlinear fractional differential equations involving the Caputo–Fabrizio differential operator. Further, we have developed ILTM to obtain approximate solutions of the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional differential equations successfully. The approximate solutions are compared with exact solutions and also with other existing solutions by other methods. It is observed that the obtained approximate series solutions for the first three terms are very precise and converge very rapidly to the solutions of real physical problems. The proposed approach is reliable, simple and effective to find approximate solutions of many nonlinear reaction–diffusion equations of fractional order.
References
Aronson, D.G., Weinberger, H.F.: Multidimensional nonlinear diffusion arising in population genetics. Adv. Math. 30, 33–76 (1978)
Atangana, A.: On the new fractional derivative and application to nonlinear Fisher’s reaction–diffusion equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 273, 948–956 (2016)
Atangana, A., GómezAguilar, J.F.: A new derivative with normal distribution kernel: theory, methods and applications. Physica A 476, 1–14 (2017)
Atangana, A., GómezAguilar, J.F.: Numerical approximation of Riemann–Liouville definition of fractional derivative: from Riemann–Liouville to Atangana–Baleanu. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 34, 1502–1523 (2018)
Aydogan, S., Baleanu, D., Mousalou, A., Rezapour, S.: On approximate solutions for two higher order Caputo–Fabrizio fractional integrodifferential equtions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 221 (2017)
Baleanu, D., Machado, J.A.T., Cattani, C., Baleanu, M.C., Yang, X.J.: Local fractional variational iteration and decomposition methods for wave equation on Cantor sets within local fractional operators. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2014, Article ID 535048 (2014)
Baleanu, D., Mousalou, A., Rezapour, S.: On the existence of solutions for some infinite coefficientsymmetric Caputo–Fabrizio fractional integrodifferential equations. Bound. Value Probl. 2017, 145 (2017)
Bashiri, T., Vaezpour, S.M., Nieto, J.J.: Approximating solution of Fabrizio–Caputo Volterra’s model for population growth in a closed system by homotopy analysis method. J. Funct. Spaces 2018, Article ID 3152502 (2018)
Caputo, M., Fabrizio, M.: A new definition of fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 73–85 (2015)
DaftardarGejji, V., Jafari, H.: An iterative method for solving non linear functional equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 316, 753–763 (2006)
Dokuyucu, M.A., Celik, E., Bulut, H., Baskonus, H.M.: Cancer treatment model with the Caputo–Fabrizio fractional derivative. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133(92), 1–6 (2018)
Erban, R., Chapman, S.J.: Stochastic modelling of reaction–diffusion processes: algorithms for bimolecular reactions. Phys. Biol. 6, 046001 (2009)
Fisher, R.A.: The wave of advance of advantageous genes. Ann. Eugen. 7, 335–369 (1937)
Fitzhugh, R.: Impulse and physiological states in models of nerve membrane. J. Biophys. 1, 445–466 (1961)
Furati, K.M., Kassim, M.D., Tatar, N.T.: Existence and uniqueness for a problem involving Hilfer fractional derivative. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 1616–1626 (2012)
GómezAguilar, J.F., Atangana, A.: New insight in fractional differentiation: power, exponential decay and MittagLeffler laws and applications. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132(13), 1–21 (2017)
GómezAguilar, J.F., Torres, L., YépezMartínez, H., Baleanu, D., Reyes, J.M., Sosa, I.O.: Fractional Liénard type model of a pipeline within the fractional derivative without singular kernel. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 173 (2016)
GómezAguilar, J.F., YépezMartínez, H., CalderónRamón, C., CruzOrduña, I., EscobarJiménez, R.F., OlivaresPeregrino, V.H.: Modeling of a massspringdamper system by fractional derivatives with and without a singular kernel. Entropy 17(9), 6289–6303 (2015)
GómezAguilar, J.F., YépezMartínez, H., EscobarJiménez, R.F., OlivaresPeregrino, V.H., Reyes, J.M., Sosa, I.O.: Series solution for the timefractional coupled mKdV equation using the homotopy analysis method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2016, 1–8 (2016)
GómezAguilar, J.F., YépezMartínez, H., TorresJiménez, J., CórdovaFraga, T., EscobarJiménez, R.F., OlivaresPeregrino, V.H.: Homotopy perturbation transform method for nonlinear differential equations involving to fractional operator with exponential kernel. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 68 (2017)
Henry, B.I., Wearne, S.L.: Fractional reaction–diffusion. Physica A 276, 448–455 (2000)
Hilfer, R.: Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)
Jafari, H., Nazari, M., Baleanu, D., Khalique, C.M.: A new approach for solving a system of fractional partial differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 66(5), 838–843 (2013)
Khan, N.A., Khan, N.U., Asmat, A., Muhammad, J.: Approximate analytical solutions of fractional reaction–diffusion equations. J. King Saud Univ. 24, 111–118 (2012)
Losada, J., Nieto, J.J.: Properties of a new fractional derivative without singular kernel. Prog. Fract. Differ. Appl. 1(2), 87–92 (2015)
Magin, R.L.: Fractional calculus models of complex dynamics in biological tissues. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1586–1593 (2010)
Merdan, M.: Solutions of timefractional reaction–diffusion equation with modified Riemann–Liouville derivative. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 7, 2317–2326 (2012)
Oldham, K.B.: Fractional differential equations in electrochemistry. Adv. Eng. Softw. 41, 9–12 (2010)
Sontakke, B.R., Shaikh, A.: Approximate solutions of time fractional Kawahara and modified Kawahara equations by fractional complex transform. Commun. Numer. Anal. 2, 218–229 (2016)
Sontakke, B.R., Shaikh, A., Nisar, K.S.: Approximate solutions of a generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV and a coupled mKdV systems with time fractional derivatives. Malaysian J. Math. Sci. 12(2), 175–196 (2018)
Tchier, F., Mustafa, I., Korpinar, Z.S., Baleanu, D.: Solutions of the time fractional reaction–diffusion equations with residual power series method. Adv. Mech. Eng. 8(10), 1–10 (2016)
Veeresha, P., Prakasha, D.G., Baskonus, H.M.: New numerical surfaces to the mathematical model of cancer chemotherapy effect in Caputo fractional derivatives. Chaos 29, 013119 (2019)
Wilhelmsson, H., Lazzaro, E.: Reaction–Diffusion Problems in the Physics of Hot Plasmas. IOP Publishing, Bristol (2001)
XiaoJun, X.J., Srivastava, H.M., Machado, J.T.: A new fractional derivative without singular kernel. Therm. Sci. 20(2), 753–756 (2016)
Zhang, S., Hu, L., Sun, S.: The uniqueness of solution for initial value problems for fractional differential equation involving the Caputo–Fabrizio derivative. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 11, 428–436 (2018)
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the paper in current form.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Shaikh, A., Tassaddiq, A., Nisar, K.S. et al. Analysis of differential equations involving Caputo–Fabrizio fractional operator and its applications to reaction–diffusion equations. Adv Differ Equ 2019, 178 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201921153
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s1366201921153