- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Conservative Fourier spectral method for a class of modified Zakharov system with high-order space fractional quantum correction
Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models volume 2023, Article number: 44 (2023)
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the Fourier spectral method and numerical investigation for a class of modified Zakharov system with high-order space fractional quantum correction. First, the numerical scheme of the system is developed with periodic boundary condition based on the Crank–Nicolson/leap-frog methods in time and the Fourier spectral method in space. Moreover, it is shown that the scheme preserves simultaneously mass and energy conservation laws. Second, we analyze stability and convergence of the numerical scheme. Last, the numerical experiments are given, and the results show the correctness of theoretical results and the efficiency of the conservative scheme.
1 Introduction
The classical Zakharov system is one of the best models in describing the coupling of high-frequency Langmuir waves and low-frequency ion-acoustic waves. Moreover, it has been widely applied to shallow water wave, nonlinear optics, etc. During the past decades, some attentions have been paid to study the properties of the classical Zakharov system, for example, solitary wave solution [1], well-posedness [2], chaotic behavior [3], etc. In particular, many numerical methods such as conservative difference scheme [4], energy-preserving scheme [5], multi-symplectic scheme [6], time-splitting schemes [7, 8] have been developed to solve the classical Zakharov system with homogeneous boundary condition or periodic boundary condition.
Quantum effect plays a very important role in the field of micro-equipment and laser plasma. In 2005, Garcia et al. [9] considered the Landau damping of Langmuir wave in the study of the plasma and obtained the quantum Zakharov system
where H is the dimensionless quantum parameter. In equations (1)–(2), E, N are complex and real-valued unknown functions, and E, N are the Langmuir envelope electric field and the density fluctuation respectively. Afterwards, some attentions have been paid to study theory and numerical methods of the quantum Zakharov system [10–13]. In [11], Misra et al. studied the pattern dynamics and spatiotemporal chaos of the quantum modified Zakharov system. In [14], Fang et al. obtained some exact traveling wave solutions of the quantum Zakharov system by using the hyperbolic tangent function expansion, hyperbolic secant function expansion, and Jacobi elliptic functions expansion. In [15], the existence of weak global solutions to quantum Zakharov system was obtained by using the Arzela–Ascoli theorem and the Faedo–Galerkin method.
Recently, fractional calculus [16–20] has been playing more and more important roles in quantum mechanics. In particular, many numerical methods such as finite difference scheme, Fourier spectral scheme, finite element scheme, etc. have been developed for the space fractional Schrödinger equations [21–32], space fractional Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations [33–36], and space fractional Klein–Gordon–Zakharov equations [37] with zeros boundary condition or periodic boundary condition. In this paper, we consider the modified Zakharov system with high-order space fractional quantum correction [38]
where \(1<\alpha \leq \beta \leq 2\). The global existence and uniqueness of the solution of system (3)–(4) are shown in [38]. In [39], the finite difference scheme is used to solve the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6) with periodic boundary condition, and strict theoretical analysis such as existence, uniqueness, convergence, and stability of the scheme is also shown. Moreover, the scheme can exactly preserve the mass and energy conservation laws. When \(H=0\), system (3)–(4) reduces to the classical Zakharov system, which has been studied extensively in [1–9]. When \(H\neq 0\), \(\alpha =\beta =2\), system (3)–(4) reduces to the quantum Zakharov system (1)–(2). It is easy to show that system (3)–(6) satisfies the mass and energy conserved laws [38, 39]
where \(\partial _{x}^{2}u=\partial _{t}N\).
Some numerical schemes have been designed to discrete fractional Laplace operator, including finite difference scheme, finite element scheme etc. Under the periodic boundary condition, the fractional Laplacian operator is defined as [17]
where Ê is the Fourier transform, and \((-\Delta )^{\beta}N(x,t)\) can be defined in the same way. As a class of high accuracy methods, Fourier spectral methods are often chosen to solve differential equations with periodic boundary condition. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there exist few reports on Fourier spectral method for the fractional quantum Zakharov system (3)–(6). The first aim of this paper is to develop a Fourier spectral method to solve the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6) with periodic boundary condition. To deal with the nonlinear term, we also introduce the Fourier interpolation operator. It is very important to construct a numerical method for the nonlinear partial differential equations. In addition, a large number of numerical experiments show that the conservation numerical schemes are superior to the traditional numerical schemes. The second aim of this paper is to develop a conservative numerical scheme to solve the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6) with periodic boundary condition.
The outline of the paper is as follows. In Sect. 2, we give some useful lemmas. In Sect. 3, the fully discrete Fourier spectral method is proposed by the Fourier spectral scheme in space, as well as Crank–Nicolson and leap-frog schemes in time, and the conservativeness of the scheme is shown. In Sect. 4, the stability of the fully discrete Fourier spectral scheme is analyzed. In Sect. 5, the convergence and error estimate for the fully discrete Fourier spectral scheme are presented. In Sect. 6, some numerical experiments are given to show the efficiency of the conservative scheme. Finally, a conclusion is given in Sect. 7.
2 A useful lemma
In this paper, we select periodic boundary condition, the solution \(E(x,t)\), \(N(x,t)\) can be expressed as
where \(\Omega =[-\frac{L}{2},\frac{L}{2}]\). Let \(r>0\). Then \(H_{p}^{r}(\Omega )\) represents the Sobolev space in which the periodic function is formed, and Sobolev norm and seminorm are as follows:
Let \(V_{M}=\{E(x)|E(x)=\sum_{|k|\leq M/2}\hat{E}_{k}e^{-ik(x+L/2)}, M/2\in Z^{+}\}\). Then define the orthogonal projector
to approximate the function \(E(x,t)\). From the definition of the orthogonal projector operator, we get
where the inner product \((\cdot ,\cdot )\) can be expressed as
where \(\overline{g(x)}\) is the conjugate complex function of \(g(x)\).
Lemma 1
[40] Let \(r>0\), \(E\in H_{p}^{r}(\Omega )\). Then there exists a constant C independent of E and M such that
3 A conservative fully discrete scheme for the fractional quantum Zakharov system
First, we introduce some finite difference operators
In the following sections, C represents a general constant, and it may have different values in different places.
We apply the Crank–Nicolson/ leap-frog methods in time and the Fourier spectral method in space and obtain the three-level scheme
where
Theorem 1
The Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) is conservative in the sense
Proof
Let \(\varphi =E_{M}^{n+1}+E_{M}^{n}\) in (9). Then taking the imaginary part of equation (9) yields
Let \(\varphi =\frac{2}{\tau}(E_{M}^{n+1}-E_{M}^{n})\) in (9). Then taking the real part of equation (9) yields
Taking \(\varphi =\frac{1}{2}(u^{n+\frac{1}{2}}+u^{n-\frac{1}{2}})\) in (10) yields
Noting that
we obtain
The above equation and (14) yield
Thus \(\Lambda ^{n+1}=\Lambda ^{n}=\cdots =\Lambda ^{1}=C\). This ends the proof. □
Because of the nonlinear term of the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6), numerical scheme (9)–(13) takes a lot of calculation time. To improve the efficiency of calculation, we introduce the interpolation operator \(I_{M}:L^{2}(\Omega )\rightarrow V_{J}''\) by
where
Applying the above interpolation operator to the nonlinear term of the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6), we can obtain the following numerical scheme:
4 Stability analysis for the fully discrete Fourier spectral scheme
Lemma 2
There exists a constant C depending only on the initial and boundary values such that the solution of the Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) satisfies
Proof
It follows from the Young inequality that
where \(\varepsilon >0\) is the Young inequality parameter.
Taking \(\varepsilon =\frac{1}{2}\) can yield
According to the Sobolev and Young inequalities, we obtain
Thus
This ends the proof. □
Theorem 2
The Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) is bounded in the discrete \(l^{2}\) and \(l^{\infty}\) norms, and
Proof
It follows from Lemma 2 and Theorem 1 that
According to the Sobolev inequality, it holds that
This ends the proof. □
5 Convergence and error estimates
Let
where \(\tilde{e}^{n}=E^{n}-P_{M}E^{n}\), \(\tilde{\eta}=N^{n}-P_{M}N^{n}\), \(e_{M}^{n}=P_{M}E^{n}-E_{M}^{n}\), \(\eta _{M}^{n}=P_{M}N^{n}-N_{M}^{n}\). Substituting the solutions \(E(x, t_{n})\), \(N(x, t_{n})\) into equations (3)–(4) and subtracting (11) from (3) and (12) from (4) respectively, we have
where
It follows from Theorem 2 that we can obtain the following lemma easily.
Lemma 3
Assume that E, N are a solution of the fractional quantum Zakharov system (3)–(6), and the initial values \(E_{0}\in H_{P}^{1},N_{0}\), \(N_{1}\in L^{2}_{p}\). Then there exists the unique solution \(E_{M}\), \(N_{M}\) of the Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13). Moreover, we have the following estimate:
Proof
It follows from (17)–(18) that
Noting that
we obtain
This ends the proof. □
Accordingly, Lemma 3 can yield the following lemma.
Lemma 4
There exists a constant C depending only on the initial and boundary values such that the solution of the discrete scheme satisfies
Proof
Let \(\varphi =e_{M}^{n+\frac{1}{2}}\). Then taking the imaginary part of equation (19) yields
Noting that
and using Lemma 3, we obtain
This ends the proof. □
Now, we consider the energy modulus estimate of \(E_{M}^{n+\frac{1}{2}}\). First, we give the following lemma.
Lemma 5
Suppose that \(E_{0}\in H_{P}^{1},N_{0}\), \(N_{1}\in L^{2}_{p}\). Then we have the following estimate:
where
Proof
It follows from (17)–(18) that
Let
For the first term of equation (21), it holds that
here \(\tilde{A}^{n}=\frac{1}{2\tau}\operatorname{Re}((\tilde{\eta}^{n+1}+\tilde{\eta}^{n}) \omega ^{n},e_{M}^{n+1})\).
For the second term of equation (21), it holds that
here \(A^{n}=\frac{1}{2\tau}\operatorname{Re}(({\eta}_{M}^{n+1}+{\eta}_{M}^{n}) \omega ^{n},e_{M}^{n+1})\).
For the third term of equation (21), it holds that
here \(\tilde{B}^{n}=\frac{1}{2\tau}\operatorname{Re}((N_{M}^{n+1}+N_{M}^{n}) \tilde{\omega}^{n},e_{M}^{n+1})\).
For the fourth term of equation (21), it holds that
here \(B^{n}=\frac{1}{\tau}\operatorname{Re}(N_{M}^{n+\frac{1}{2}},| e_{M}^{n+1}| ^{2})\).
Finally, noting equations (22)–(25), we get
This ends the proof. □
It follows from Lemma 5 that we can obtain the following lemma.
Lemma 6
There exists a constant C depending only on the initial and boundary values such that the solution of the discrete scheme satisfies
Proof
Let \(\varphi =-\frac{1}{\tau}(e^{n+1}_{M}-e^{n}_{M})\) in (19). Then taking the real part of equation (19) yields
Noting that
we can obtain
It follows from Lemma 5 that
This ends the proof. □
Lemma 7
There exists a constant C depending only on the initial and boundary values such that the solution of the discrete scheme satisfies
Proof
Let \(\varphi =-\frac{1}{2}(U^{n}+U^{n-1})\) in (20). Then we obtain
It follows from integration by parts that
Thus
This ends the proof. □
Theorem 3
Suppose that E, N satisfy \(N, \partial _{t}N, \partial _{t}E\in L^{2}[0,T;H_{p}^{\sigma}(I)]\), \(\partial _{x}E\in H_{p}^{\sigma -1}(I)\), \(\sigma >1\),
There exists a constant C depending only on the initial and boundary values such that
Proof
Let
It follows from Lemmas 5 and 6 that
Let
Then it follows from Lemma 4 that
When \(\gamma >1\), we can obtain
Noting that
we get
Based on the definition of \(\theta ^{n}\), we have
It follows from (26)–(28) that
Let
Then, by the similarity analysis in [41], we have
Noting that \(e_{M}^{0}=\eta _{M}^{0}=\eta _{M}^{1}=0\), we get \({\theta}^{n} \leq C\hat{\theta}^{n}\leq C(M^{-2\sigma}+\tau ^{4})\). This ends the proof. □
6 Numerical experiments
In this section, we use the Fourier spectral method in space and the Crank–Nicolson/ leap-frog in time to solve the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6) with periodic boundary condition. We report the numerical accuracy, CPU time, invariants-preserving properties, and solitary wave graph for the fractional modified Zakharov system (3)–(6).
6.1 Experiment A (\(H = 0\))
When \(H=0\), system (3)–(6) becomes the classical Zakharov system and has the exact solitary wave solutions [42]
Take the initial values with \(B=1\), \(x_{0}=0\), \(v=0.5\),
We first calculate the convergence orders in time by using the conservative Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) with \(H=0\). Table 1 displays the numerical orders of time accuracy by scheme (9)–(13) when \(t=1\) and \(M=4096\). It clearly indicates that the proposed scheme (9)–(13) is of order 2 in time. Secondly, we test the space errors and the convergence orders by using the conservative Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) when \(\tau =1/4096\), \(t = 1\). Table 2 displays the numerical orders of space accuracy by scheme (9)–(13). It can be seen that the Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) achieves spectral convergence up to machine precision. In addition, we display also the convergence orders and errors of time and space accuracy by the numerical scheme in [39]. Figure 1 displays the numerical orders of time and space accuracy by the numerical scheme in [39] when \(t=1\). It clearly indicates that the proposed scheme is of order 2 in time and space. Then, we choose the parameters \(t \in [0, 20]\), \(\tau =0.001\), \(M=512\). The waveform diagrams of numerical solution are given by Fig. 2.
Finally, we will test the conservative property of the conservative Fourier spectral method (9)–(13). We choose the parameters \(t\in [0,50] \), \(\tau =0.001\), \(M=512\). Figure 3 displays the errors in the total mass \(M^{n}\) and energy \(E^{n}\). It clearly indicates that the conservative Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) preserves the mass and energy conservation laws very well simultaneously.
6.2 Experiment B (\(H > 0\))
When \(H>0\), system (3)–(6) becomes the quantum Zakharov system or fractional quantum Zakharov system. We take the same initial values with Example A. When \(H>0\), the numerical exact solutions E, N are obtained by \(M=4096\), \(\tau =1/4096\). First, calculate the convergence orders in time and space by using the conservative Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) for the quantum Zakharov system with \(H=0.0001\). The results are listed in Tables 3–4. Secondly, we verify the time and space convergence orders by scheme (9)–(13) for the fractional quantum Zakharov system with \(H=0.0001\) and different α, β. The results are listed in Tables 5–8. From Tables 3–8, it is found that scheme (9)–(13) is also of order 2 in time, and the Fourier method approach also achieves spectral convergence up to machine precision. In addition, we also show the convergence orders and errors by the numerical scheme in [39]. Figure 4 shows the numerical orders of time and space accuracy by the numerical scheme in [39] when \(t=1\). It clearly indicates that the proposed scheme is also of order 2 in time and space. Moreover, we show also CPU times with \(\alpha =1.4, 1.6\) by numerical scheme (9)–(13), numerical scheme (15)–(16), and the finite difference scheme in [39]. The results are listed in Table 9. From Table 9, it is found that numerical scheme (15)–(16) takes the least time and has the highest computational efficiency, followed by numerical scheme (9)–(13), and the finite difference scheme takes the longest time. Moreover, we also find that the calculation time is related to α. In a similar method, we can obtain corresponding conclusions for different fractional order β.
Then, we will test the conservative property of the conservative Fourier spectral method (9)–(13) for the fractional quantum Zakharov system. We choose the parameters \(t\in [0,50] \), \(\tau =0.001\), \(M=512\) different α, β. Figures 5–7 display the errors in the total mass \(M^{n}\) and energy \(E^{n}\). It clearly indicates that the Fourier spectral scheme (9)–(13) preserves also the mass and energy conservation laws very well simultaneously for the quantum Zakharov system or the fractional quantum Zakharov system.
Finally, the effects of the parameter H and fractional orders α, β on the solitary solution behaviors are investigated. We simulate the solitary wave solution with \(t\in [0, 100]\), \(\tau =0.001\), \(M=512\). Figures 8–9 show the wave forms of numerical solutions \(|E|\), N for different H, α, β. From Figs. 8–9, it is found that the numerical results indicate that the maximum of solution N increases faster with H, and the solution N will eventually blow up. Figures 10–18 show the wave forms of numerical solutions \(|E|\), N for different H, α, β with the same time. From Figs. 10–18, it is found that some small oscillations appear on the two sides of solitary wave \(|E|\) and N respectively. From Figs. 10–18, we find also that the values H will affect the propagation velocity of the solitary wave. When H becomes small, the propagation of the soliton will be quick.
7 Conclusion
In the paper, the Fourier spectral method for a class of modified Zakharov systems with high-order space fractional quantum correction is proposed. It is shown that this method preserves the discrete mass and energy conservation laws. The stability and convergence of the scheme are proved. Numerical tests are presented to demonstrate the theoretical results and the method availability, and to investigate the conservation property for different values of orders α and β. Moreover, the effects of the parameter H and fractional orders α, β on the solitary solution behaviors are also investigated numerically.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Zhou, X., Zhang, L.: A conservative compact difference scheme for the Zakharov equations in one space dimension. Int. J. Comput. Math. 95(2), 1–30 (2017)
Pecher, H.: An improved local well-posedness result for the one-dimensional Zakharov system. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 342, 1440–1454 (2008)
Sharma, R., Batra, K., Verga, A.: Nonlinear evolution of the modulational instability and chaos using one-dimensional Zakharov equations and a simplified model. Phys. Plasmas 12(2), p022311 (2005)
Zhou, X., Zhang, L.: A conservative compact difference scheme for the Zakharov equations in one space dimension. Int. J. Comput. Math. 95(2), 279–302 (2018)
Glassey, R.: Convergence of an energy-preserving scheme for the Zakharov equations in one space dimension. Math. Comput. 58, 83 (1992)
Wang, J.: Multi-symplectic numerical method for the Zakharov system. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1063–1071 (2009)
Bao, W., Sun, F.: Efficient and stable numerical methods for the generalized and vector Zakharov system. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 26(3), 1057–1088 (2005)
Bao, W., Sun, F., Wei, G.: Numerical methods for the generalized Zakharov system. J. Comput. Phys. 190(1), 201–228 (2003)
Garcia, L., Haas, F., Oliveira, L., Goedert, J.: Modified Zakharov equations for plasmas with a quantum correction. Phys. Plasmas 12(1), 3842 (2005)
Marklund, M.: Classical and quantum kinetics of the Zakharov system. Phys. Plasmas 12(8), 2763 (2005)
Misra, A., Shukla, P.: Pattern dynamics and spatiotemporal chaos in the quantum Zakharov equations. Phys. Rev. E 79(5), 056401 (2009)
Misra, A., Ghosh, D., Chowdhury, A.: A novel hyperchaos in the quantum Zakharov system for plasmas. Phys. Lett. A 372(9), 1469–1476 (2008)
Misra, A., Banerjee, S., Haas, F., et al.: Temporal dynamics in the one-dimensional quantum Zakharov equations for plasmas. Phys. Plasmas 17(3), 908 (2010)
Fang, S., Guo, C., Guo, B.: Exact traveling wave solutions of modified Zakharov equations for plasmas with a quantum correction. Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B Engl. Ed. 32(3), 1073–1082 (2012)
Fang, S., Jin, L., Guo, B.: Existence of weak solution for quantum Zakharov equations for plasmas model. Appl. Math. Mech. 32(10), 1339–1344 (2011)
Baleanu, D., Diethelm, K., Scalas, E., Trujillo, J.: Fractional Calculus: Models and Numerical Methods. World Scientific, Singapore (2012)
Guo, B., Pu, X., Huang, F.: Fractional Partial Differential Equations and Their Numerical Solutions. World Scientific, Singapore (2011)
Li, C., Zeng, F.: Numerical Methods for Fractional Calculus. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2015)
Sun, Z., Gao, G.: Finite Difference Methods for Fractional-Order Differential Equations. Science Press, Beijing (2015)
Liu, F., Zhuang, P., Liu, Q.: Numerical Methods and Their Applications of Fractional Partial Differential Equations. Science Press, Beijing (2015)
Wang, P., Huang, C.: An energy conservative difference scheme for the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations. J. Comput. Phys. 293, 238–251 (2015)
Wang, P., Huang, C., Zhao, L.: Point-wise error estimate of a conservative difference scheme for the fractional Schrödinger equation. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 306, 231–247 (2016)
Wang, D., Xiao, A., Yang, W.: Crank-Nicolson difference scheme for the coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with the Riesz space fractional derivative. J. Comput. Phys. 242, 670–681 (2013)
Duo, S., Zhang, Y.: Mass-conservative Fourier spectral methods for solving the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 71, 2257–2271 (2016)
Xiao, A., Wang, J.: Symplectic scheme for the Schrödinger equation with fractional Laplacian. Appl. Numer. Math. 146, 469–487 (2019)
Li, M., Gu, X., Huang, C., Fei, M., Zhang, G.: A fast linearized conservative finite element method for the strongly coupled nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations. J. Comput. Phys. 358, 256–282 (2018)
Liang, X., Khaliq, A.: An efficient Fourier spectral exponential time differencing method for the space-fractional nonlinear Schrödinger. Comput. Math. Appl. 75, 4438–4457 (2018)
Ran, M., Zhang, C.: A conservative difference scheme for solving the strongly coupled nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 41, 64–83 (2016)
Aboelenen, T.: A high-order nodal discontinuous Galerkin method for nonlinear fractional Schrödinger type equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 54, 428–452 (2018)
Zhao, X., Sun, Z., Hao, Z.: A fourth-order compact ADI scheme for two-dimensional nonlinear space fractional Schrödinger equation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36(6), A2865–A2886 (2014)
Liang, J., Song, S., Zhou, W., Fu, H.: Analysis of the damped nonlinear space-fractional Schrödinger equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 320, 495–511 (2018)
Huang, Y., Li, X., Xiao, A.: Fourier pseudospectral method on generalized sparse grids for the space-fractional Schrödinger equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 75, 4241–4255 (2018)
Wang, J., Xiao, A.: An efficient conservative difference scheme for fractional Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 320, 691–709 (2018)
Shi, Y., Ma, Q., Ding, X.: A new energy-preserving scheme for the fractional Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations. Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. 11(5), 1219–1247 (2019)
Wang, Y., Li, Q., Mei, L.: A linear, symmetric and energy-conservative scheme for the space-fractional Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations. Appl. Math. Lett. 95, 104–113 (2019)
Wang, J., Xiao, A.: Conservative Fourier spectral method and numerical investigation of space fractional Klein–Gordon–Schrödinger equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 350, 348–365 (2019)
Martinez, R., Macias-Diaz, J., Hendy, A.: Theoretical analysis of an explicit energy-conserving scheme for a fractional Klein–Gordon–Zakharov system. Appl. Numer. Math. 146, 245–259 (2019)
Li, L., Jin, L., Xie, C., Fang, S.: The fractional modified Zakharov system for plasmas with a quantum correction. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2015, 377 (2015)
Xiao, A., Wang, C., Wang, J.: Conservative linearly-implicit difference scheme for a class of modified Zakharov systems with high-order space fractional quantum correction. Appl. Numer. Math. 146, 379–399 (2019)
Shen, J., Tang, T., Wang, L.: Spectral Methods Algorithms, Analysis and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Sun, L.: Fourier spectral method for Zakharov Equations. Heilongjiang University Master’s thesis (2010)
Glassey, R.: Approximate solutions to the Zakharov equations via finite differences. J. Comput. Phys. 100, 377–383 (1992)
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the referees for their useful comments on their paper.
Funding
This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 12071403, 12161070), Xing dian talent support project (No. XDYC-QNRC-2022-0038).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, T., Xiao, A., Wang, J. et al. Conservative Fourier spectral method for a class of modified Zakharov system with high-order space fractional quantum correction. Adv Cont Discr Mod 2023, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-023-03790-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-023-03790-4