Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

The tanh-coth method for some nonlinear pseudoparabolic equations with exact solutions

Abstract

We studied mostly important four nonlinear pseudoparabolic physical models: the Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers (BBMPB) equation, the Oskolkov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers (OBBMB) equation, the one-dimensional Oskolkov equation and the generalised hyperelastic-rod wave equation. By using the tanh-coth method and symbolic computation system Maple, we have obtained abundant new solutions of these equations. The exact solutions show that the tanh-coth method is a powerful mathematical tool for solving nonlinear pseudoparabolic equations.

1 Introduction

Equations with a one-time derivative appearing in the highest order term are called pseudoparabolic and arise in many areas of mathematics and physics. They have been used, for instance, for fluid flow in fissured rock, consolidation of clay, shear in second-order fluids, thermodynamics and propagation of long waves of small amplitude. For more details, we refer the reader to [15] and references therein.

An important special case of pseudoparabolic-type equations is the generalised Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers (BBMB) equation

u t u x x t α u x x +γ u x +f ( u ) x =0,
(1)

where u(x,t) represents the fluid velocity in the horizontal direction x, α is a positive constant, γ is any given real constant and f(u) is a C 2 -smooth nonlinear function. For f ( u ) x =u u x with α=0, γ=1 in equation (1) was proposed as an alternative regularised long-wave equation by Peregrine [6] and Benjamin et al. [7] for the well-known Korteweg-de Vries equation

u t + u x x t + u x +u u x =0.
(2)

If we take f ( u ) x =θu u x +β u x x x in equation (1), then we obtain a general form of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers (BBMPB) equation

u t u x x t α u x x +γ u x +θu u x +β u x x x =0.
(3)

Taking α=β=0 in (3), we get the general form of the BBM equation as follows:

u t u x x t +γ u x +θu u x =0,
(4)

where γ, θ are constants and θ0. Equation (3) includes several types of the BBM equation as seen in the literature. For more details, we refer the reader to [615]. We will study the general form of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers (BBMPB) equation (3) using the tanh-coth method. We aim to extend the previous works especially in [6, 7] to make further progress for obtaining abundant new travelling wave solutions.

For β=0 in equation (3), we obtain a general form of the Oskolkov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers equation

u t u x x t α u x x +γ u x +θu u x =0.
(5)

This nonlinear, one-dimensional and pseudoparabolic equation describes nonlinear surface waves that spread along the axis Ox and α u x x is the viscosity term [16, 17]. In the literature the inverse scattering method has been thoroughly used to derive the multiple soliton solutions of equation (5) [8, 1822]. In this work we developed these solutions in a way that can be easily applied by using the tanh-coth method, which is less sophisticated than the inverse scattering method.

The equation

u t λ u x x t α u x x +u u x =0
(6)

is a one-dimensional analogue of the Oskolkov system

( 1 λ 2 ) u t =α 2 u(u)u 2 p+f,u=0.
(7)

This system describes the dynamics of an incompressible viscoelastic Kelvin-Voigt fluid. It was indicated in [23, 24] that the parameter λ can be negative and the negativeness of the parameter λ does not contradict the physical meaning of equation (7). We implemented the tanh-coth method to solve equation (6) and obtained new solutions which could not be attained in the past.

The generalised hyperelastic-rod wave equation

u t u x x t +α u x +2βu u x +3θ u 2 u x γ u x u x x u u x x x =0
(8)

was first introduced in [25], in which the global existence of dissipative solutions were established, where α, β, θ and γ are constant parameters. This equation includes many important physical models in mathematical physics.

For β= 3 2 , θ=0, γ=2, we obtain the Camassa-Holm (CH) equation

u t u x x t +α u x +3u u x 2 u x u x x u u x x x =0,
(9)

where u is the fluid velocity in the direction x (or, equivalently, the height of the water’s free surface above a flat bottom), α is a constant related to the critical shallow water wave speed. Camassa-Holm equation has been studied in [8, 18] and explicit travelling-wave solutions were sought [19]. Besides, solitary wave solutions for modified forms of this equation were developed by Wazwaz [20].

Taking β=2, θ=0, γ=3, equation (5) reduces to the Degasperis-Procesi (DP) equation

u t u x x t +α u x +4u u x 3 u x u x x u u x x x =0.
(10)

The recent study has revealed that the CH and DP equations can be used to describe the long-term dynamics of short surface waves [21, 22, 26].

For α=1, β= 1 2 , θ=0, γ=3, the equation (5) leads to the Fornberg-Whitham (FW) equation

u t u x x t + u x +u u x 3 u x u x x u u x x x =0.
(11)

The FW equation was used to study the qualitative behaviour of wave-breaking. A peaked solitary wave solution u(x,t)=A e 1 2 | x 4 3 t | of this type of equation was obtained by Fornberg and Whitham [27, 28]. Using the tanh-coth method, we consider equation (8), which is a combined form of CH, DP and FW equations, and obtain new exact solutions. These solutions can be seen as an improvement of the previously known data.

As stated before, pseudoparabolic-type equations arise in many areas of mathematics and physics to describe many physical phenomena. In recent years considerable attention has been paid to the study of pseudoparabolic-type equations, and to construct exact solutions for this type of equations, several methods, for instance, the tanh-coth method, have been developed. In [29, 30], we discussed some well-known Sobolev-type equations and pseudoparabolic equations and obtained new travelling wave solutions by using the tanh-coth method. Motivated by these studies, we employed the tanh-coth method to investigate new travelling wave solutions for the equations that were previously mentioned.

In what follows, we summarise the main features of the tanh-coth method as introduced in [31, 32], where more details and examples can be found.

2 Outline of the tanh-coth method

(i) First consider a general form of the nonlinear equation

P(u, u t , u x , u x x ,)=0.
(12)

(ii) To find the travelling wave solution of equation (12), the wave variable ξ=xVt is introduced so that

u(x,t)=U(μξ).
(13)

Based on this, one may use the following changes:

t = V d d ξ , x = μ d d ξ , 2 x 2 = μ 2 d 2 d ξ 2 , 3 x 3 = μ 3 d 3 d ξ 3
(14)

and so on for other derivatives. Using (14) changes PDE (12) to an ODE

Q ( U , U , U , ) =0.
(15)

(iii) If all terms of the resulting ODE contain derivatives in ξ, then by integrating this equation, and by considering the constant of integration to be zero, one obtains a simplified ODE.

(iv) A new independent variable

Y=tanh(μξ)
(16)

is introduced that leads to the change of derivatives:

d d ξ = μ ( 1 Y 2 ) d d Y , d 2 d ξ 2 = 2 μ 2 Y ( 1 Y 2 ) d d Y + μ 2 ( 1 Y 2 ) 2 d 2 d Y 2 , d 3 d ξ 3 = 2 μ 3 ( 1 Y 2 ) ( 3 Y 2 1 ) d d Y 6 μ 3 Y ( 1 Y 2 ) 2 d 2 d Y 2 + μ 3 ( 1 Y 2 ) 3 d 3 d Y 3 ,
(17)

where other derivatives can be derived in a similar manner.

(v) The ansatz of the form

U(μξ)=S(Y)= k = 0 M a k Y k + k = 1 M b k Y k
(18)

is introduced where M is a positive integer, in most cases, that will be determined. If M is not an integer, then a transformation formula is used to overcome this difficulty. Substituting (17) and (18) into ODE (15) yields an equation in powers of Y.

(vi) To determine the parameter M, the linear terms of highest order in the resulting equation with the highest order nonlinear terms are balanced. With M determined, one collects all the coefficients of powers of Y in the resulting equation, where these coefficients have to vanish. This will give a system of algebraic equations involving a k and b k (k=0,,M), V, and μ. Having determined these parameters, knowing that M is a positive integer in most cases and using (18), one obtains an analytic solution in a closed form.

3 The Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers (BBMPB) equation

The Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers (BBMPB) equation is given by

u t u x x t α u x x +γ u x +θu u x +β u x x x =0,
(19)

where α is a positive constant, θ and β are nonzero real numbers. Using the wave variable ξ=xVt in (19) then integrating this equation and considering the constant of integration to be zero, we obtain

(V+γ)Uα U + θ 2 U 2 +(V+β) U =0.
(20)

Balancing U 2 with U in (20) gives M=2. The tanh-coth method admits the use of the finite expansion

U(μξ)=S(Y)= k = 0 2 a k Y k + k = 1 2 b k Y k ,
(21)

where Y=tanh(μξ). Substituting (21) into (20) and collecting the coefficients of Y and setting it equal to zero, we find the system of equation:

Y 8 a 2 2 θ + 12 V a 2 μ 2 + 12 a 2 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 7 2 a 1 a 2 θ + 4 a 2 α μ + 4 V a 1 μ 2 + 4 a 1 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 6 2 a 2 γ + a 1 2 θ 2 V a 2 + 2 a 0 a 2 θ + 2 a 1 α μ 16 V a 2 μ 2 16 a 2 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 5 2 a 1 γ 2 V a 1 + 2 b 1 a 2 θ + 2 a 0 a 1 θ 4 a 2 α μ 4 V a 1 μ 2 4 a 1 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 4 2 a 0 γ + a 0 2 θ 2 V a 0 + 2 b 1 a 1 θ + 2 b 2 a 2 θ 2 b 1 α μ 2 a 1 α μ + 4 V b 2 μ 2 , Y 4 + 4 V a 2 μ 2 + 4 b 2 β μ 2 + 4 a 2 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 3 2 b 1 γ 2 V b 1 + 2 b 1 a 0 θ + 2 b 2 a 1 θ 4 b 2 α μ 4 V b 1 μ 2 4 b 1 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 2 2 b 2 γ + b 1 2 θ 2 V b 2 + 2 b 2 a 0 θ + 2 b 1 α μ 16 V b 2 μ 2 16 b 2 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 1 2 b 1 b 2 θ + 4 b 2 α μ + 4 V b 1 μ 2 + 4 b 1 β μ 2 = 0 , Y 0 b 2 2 θ + 12 V b 2 μ 2 + 12 b 2 β μ 2 = 0 .
(22)

Using Maple gives eighteen sets of solutions:

a 0 = γ β θ , a 1 = γ + β θ , a 2 = b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = β , μ = γ β 2 α , a 0 = a 1 = γ β θ , a 2 = b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = β , μ = γ + β 2 α , a 0 = γ β θ , a 1 = b 1 = γ + β 2 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 0 , V = β , μ = γ β 4 α , a 0 = γ β θ , a 1 = a 2 = b 2 = 0 , b 1 = γ β θ , V = β , μ = γ + β 2 α , a 0 = γ β θ , a 1 = γ β 2 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 0 , b 1 = γ + β 2 θ , V = β , μ = γ + β 4 α , a 0 = γ β θ , a 1 = a 2 = b 2 = 0 , b 1 = γ + β θ , V = β , μ = γ + β 2 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ α ) 80 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 4 ( 5 γ μ 5 β μ α ) 16 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α ) 80 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ + 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α 16 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 β μ μ , μ = 5 γ 5 β ± 25 γ 2 + 50 γ β + 25 β 2 + 24 α 2 48 α .
(23)

These sets give the solutions respectively:

u 1 ( x , t ) = γ β θ + γ + β θ tanh μ ( x V t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) = γ β θ γ + β θ tanh μ ( x V t ) , u 3 ( x , t ) = γ β θ + γ + β 2 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + γ + β 2 θ coth μ ( x V t ) , u 4 ( x , t ) = γ β θ γ + β θ coth μ ( x V t ) , u 5 ( x , t ) = γ β θ γ + β θ tanh μ ( x V t ) γ + β 2 θ coth μ ( x V t ) , u 6 ( x , t ) = γ β θ + γ + β θ coth μ ( x V t ) , u 7 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 8 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 9 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 10 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 11 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 12 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 13 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 14 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 15 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ α ) 80 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 16 ( x , t ) = 4 ( 5 γ μ 5 β μ α ) 16 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 17 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α ) 80 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 18 ( x , t ) = 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α 16 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) .
(24)

4 The Oskolkov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers (OBBMB) equation

We consider the Oskolkov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers (OBBMB) equation

u t u x x t α u x x +γ u x +θu u x =0,
(25)

where α is positive and θ is a nonzero constant. Using the wave variable ξ=xVt in (25) then integrating this equation and considering the constant of integration to be zero, we obtain

(V+γ)U+ θ 2 U 2 α U +V U =0.
(26)

Balancing the second term with the last term in (26) gives M=2. Using the finite expansion

U(μξ)=S(Y)= k = 0 2 a k Y k + k = 1 2 b k Y k ,
(27)

where Y=tanh(μξ). Substituting (27) into (26) and collecting the coefficients of Y and setting it equal to zero, we find the system of equations:

Y 8 a 2 2 θ + 12 V a 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 7 2 a 1 a 2 θ + 4 a 2 α μ + 4 V a 1 μ 2 = 0 , Y 6 2 a 2 γ + a 1 2 θ 2 V a 2 + 2 a 0 a 2 θ + 2 a 1 α μ 16 V a 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 5 2 a 1 γ 2 V a 1 + 2 b 1 a 2 θ + 2 a 0 a 1 θ 4 a 2 α μ 4 V a 1 μ 2 = 0 , Y 4 2 a 0 γ + a 0 2 θ 2 V a 0 + 2 b 1 a 1 θ + 2 b 2 a 2 θ 2 b 1 α μ 2 a 1 α μ Y 4 + 4 V b 2 μ 2 + 4 V a 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 3 2 b 1 γ 2 V b 1 + 2 b 1 a 0 θ + 2 b 2 a 1 θ 4 b 2 α μ 4 V b 1 μ 2 = 0 , Y 2 2 b 2 γ + b 1 2 θ 2 V b 2 + 2 b 2 a 0 θ + 2 b 1 α μ 16 V b 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 1 2 b 1 b 2 θ + 4 b 2 α μ + 4 V b 1 μ 2 = 0 , Y 0 b 2 2 θ + 12 V b 2 μ 2 = 0 .
(28)

Maple gives twelve sets of solutions:

a 0 = 10 γ μ + α 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ + α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ α 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ + α 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ + α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 10 γ μ α ) 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 10 γ μ α 20 μ θ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , b 2 = 6 α μ 5 θ , V = α 10 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 24 α , a 0 = 3 ( 20 γ μ α ) 80 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 4 ( 5 γ μ α ) 16 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 3 ( 20 γ μ + α ) 80 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 24 α 2 48 α , a 0 = 20 γ μ + α 16 μ θ , a 1 = b 1 = 12 α μ 5 θ , a 2 = b 2 = 3 α μ 5 θ , V = α 20 μ , μ = 5 γ ± 25 γ 2 + 24 α 2 48 α .
(29)

These give the following solutions:

u 1 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 3 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 4 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 5 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 6 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ + α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 7 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 10 γ μ 10 β μ α ) 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 8 ( x , t ) = 10 γ μ 10 β μ α 20 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 6 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 9 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ α ) 80 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 10 ( x , t ) = 4 ( 5 γ μ 5 β μ α ) 16 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) + 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 11 ( x , t ) = 3 ( 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α ) 80 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 12 ( x , t ) = 20 γ μ 20 β μ + α 16 μ θ 12 α μ 5 θ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 12 α μ 5 θ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α μ 5 θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) .
(30)

As can be seen easily, these solutions can be obtained by taking β=0 in the solutions of previous equations.

5 The one-dimensional Oskolkov equation

The one-dimensional Oskolkov equation is given by

u t λ u x x t α u x x +u u x =0.
(31)

We will investigate the equation for λ0 and αR. Using the wave variable ξ=xVt in (31) then integrating this equation and considering the constant of integration to be zero, we obtain

VU+λ U α U + 1 2 U 2 =0.
(32)

Balancing U 2 with U in (32) gives M=2. The tanh-coth method admits the use of the finite expansion

U(μξ)=S(Y)= k = 0 2 a k Y k + k = 1 2 b k Y k ,
(33)

where Y=tanh(μξ). Substituting (33) into (32) and collecting the coefficients of Y and setting it equal to zero, we find the system of equations:

Y 8 a 2 2 + 12 λ a 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 7 4 a 1 λ μ 2 + 4 a 2 α μ + 2 a 1 a 2 = 0 , Y 6 a 1 2 + 2 α a 1 μ 16 a 2 λ μ 2 2 V a 2 + 2 a 0 a 2 = 0 , Y 5 2 b 1 a 2 4 a 2 α μ 2 V a 1 4 a 1 λ μ 2 + 2 a 0 a 1 = 0 , Y 4 2 b 1 a 1 2 V a 0 + 2 b 2 a 2 + a 0 2 2 b 1 α μ 2 a 1 α μ + 4 b 2 λ μ 2 + 4 a 2 λ μ 2 = 0 , Y 3 2 b 1 a 0 4 b 2 α μ 2 V b 1 4 b 1 λ μ 2 + 2 b 2 a 1 = 0 , Y 2 b 1 2 + 2 α b 1 μ 16 b 2 λ μ 2 2 V b 2 + 2 b 2 a 0 = 0 , Y 1 4 b 1 λ μ 2 + 4 b 2 α μ + 2 b 1 b 2 = 0 , Y 0 b 2 2 + 12 λ b 2 μ 2 = 0 .
(34)

Solving this system, we find the following sets of solutions:

a 0 = 9 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 9 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 1 = b 2 = 0 , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 9 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 10 λ , a 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , b 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 20 λ , a 0 = 9 α 2 50 λ , a 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , b 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 20 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 10 λ , a 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , b 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 20 λ , a 0 = 9 α 2 50 λ , a 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , b 1 = 3 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 100 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 20 λ , a 0 = 9 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ , a 0 = 3 α 2 25 λ , a 1 = a 2 = 0 , b 1 = 6 α 2 25 λ , b 2 = 3 α 2 25 λ , V = 6 α 2 25 λ , μ = α 10 λ .
(35)

These sets give the solutions respectively:

u 1 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 25 λ 6 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 25 λ 6 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 3 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 25 λ + 6 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 4 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 25 λ + 6 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 5 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 25 λ + 6 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 6 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 25 λ + 6 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 7 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 10 λ 3 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 8 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 50 λ 3 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 9 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 10 λ + 3 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) + 3 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 10 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 50 λ + 3 α 2 25 λ tanh μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) + 3 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 100 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 11 ( x , t ) = 9 α 2 25 λ 6 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 12 ( x , t ) = 3 α 2 25 λ 6 α 2 25 λ coth μ ( x V t ) 3 α 2 25 λ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) .
(36)

6 The generalised hyperelastic-rod wave equation

The generalised hyperelastic-rod wave equation reads as follows:

u t u x x t +α u x +2βu u x +3θ u 2 u x γ u x u x x u u x x x =0,
(37)

where α, β, θ and γ are constant parameters, and we assume that θ is nonzero. The wave variable ξ=xVt carries (37) into the ODE

V U +V U +α U +2βU U +3θ U 2 U γ U U U U =0.
(38)

Integrating this equation and considering the constant of integration to be zero, we obtain

(V+α)U+V U +β U 2 +θ U 3 γ 1 2 ( U ) 2 U U =0.
(39)

Balancing U 3 with U U in (39) gives M=2. As stated before, the tanh-coth method uses a finite series

U(μξ)=S(Y)= k = 0 2 a k Y k + k = 1 2 b k Y k
(40)

to express the solution u(x,t). Substituting (40) into (39) and collecting the coefficients of Y gives the system of algebraic equations:

Y 12 a 2 3 θ 4 a 2 2 μ 2 2 a 2 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 11 3 a 1 a 2 2 θ 6 a 1 a 2 μ 2 2 a 1 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 10 8 a 2 2 μ 2 3 a 1 2 μ 2 + 2 a 2 2 β a 1 2 γ μ 2 + 8 a 2 2 γ μ 2 + 12 V a 2 μ 2 + 6 a 0 a 2 2 θ Y 10 + 6 a 1 2 a 2 θ 12 a 0 a 2 μ 2 = 0 , Y 9 a 1 3 θ + 2 a 1 a 2 β + 2 V a 1 μ 2 + 3 b 1 a 2 2 θ 8 b 1 a 2 μ 2 2 a 0 a 1 μ 2 + 6 a 1 a 2 μ 2 Y 9 + 6 a 0 a 1 a 2 θ + 2 b 1 a 2 γ μ 2 + 4 a 1 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 8 2 a 1 2 μ 2 + 2 a 2 α + 2 a 1 2 β 2 V a 2 + 4 a 0 a 2 β + 2 a 1 2 γ μ 2 4 a 2 2 γ μ 2 16 V a 2 μ 2 Y 8 6 b 1 a 1 μ 2 + 6 b 2 a 2 2 θ 24 b 2 a 2 μ 2 + 6 a 0 a 1 2 θ + 6 a 0 2 a 2 θ Y 8 + 16 a 0 a 2 μ 2 + 12 b 1 a 1 a 2 θ + 2 b 1 a 1 γ μ 2 + 8 b 2 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 7 a 1 α V a 1 + 2 b 1 a 2 β + 2 a 0 a 1 β 2 V a 1 μ 2 + 3 b 1 a 1 2 θ + 14 b 1 a 2 μ 2 6 b 2 a 1 μ 2 Y 7 + 3 a 0 2 a 1 θ + 2 a 0 a 1 μ 2 + 6 b 1 a 0 a 2 θ + 6 b 2 a 1 a 2 θ Y 7 4 b 1 a 2 γ μ 2 + 2 b 2 a 1 γ μ 2 2 a 1 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 6 b 1 2 μ 2 + a 1 2 μ 2 + 2 a 0 α + 2 a 0 3 θ + 2 a 0 2 β 2 V a 0 + 4 b 1 a 1 β + 4 b 2 a 2 β b 1 2 γ μ 2 Y 6 a 1 2 γ μ 2 + 4 V b 2 μ 2 + 4 V a 2 μ 2 + 6 b 2 a 1 2 θ + 6 b 1 2 a 2 θ + 12 b 1 a 1 μ 2 4 b 2 a 0 μ 2 Y 6 + 48 b 2 a 2 μ 2 4 a 0 a 2 μ 2 + 12 b 1 a 0 a 1 θ + 12 b 2 a 0 a 2 θ Y 6 4 b 1 a 1 γ μ 2 16 b 2 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 5 b 1 α V b 1 + 2 b 1 a 0 β + 2 b 2 a 1 β 2 V b 1 μ 2 + 3 b 1 a 0 2 θ + 3 b 1 2 a 1 θ Y 5 + 2 b 1 a 0 μ 2 6 b 1 a 2 μ 2 + 14 b 2 a 1 μ 2 + 6 b 1 b 2 a 2 θ + 6 b 2 a 0 a 1 θ Y 5 2 b 1 b 2 γ μ 2 + 2 b 1 a 2 γ μ 2 4 b 2 a 1 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 4 2 b 1 2 μ 2 + 2 b 2 α + 2 b 1 2 β 2 V b 2 + 4 b 2 a 0 β + 2 b 1 2 γ μ 2 4 b 2 2 γ μ 2 16 V b 2 μ 2 Y 4 + 6 b 1 2 a 0 θ + 6 b 2 a 0 2 θ 6 b 1 a 1 μ 2 + 16 b 2 a 0 μ 2 + 6 b 2 2 a 2 θ Y 4 24 b 2 a 2 μ 2 + 12 b 1 b 2 a 1 θ + 2 b 1 a 1 γ μ 2 + 8 b 2 a 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 3 b 1 3 θ + 2 b 1 b 2 β + 2 V b 1 μ 2 + 6 b 1 b 2 μ 2 2 b 1 a 0 μ 2 + 3 b 2 2 a 1 θ 8 b 2 a 1 μ 2 Y 3 + 6 b 1 b 2 a 0 θ + 4 b 1 b 2 γ μ 2 + 2 b 2 a 1 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 2 8 b 2 2 μ 2 3 b 1 2 μ 2 + 2 b 2 2 β b 1 2 γ μ 2 + 8 b 2 2 γ μ 2 + 12 V b 2 μ 2 Y 2 + 6 b 1 2 b 2 θ + 6 b 2 2 a 0 θ 12 b 2 a 0 μ 2 = 0 , Y 1 3 b 1 b 2 2 θ 6 b 1 b 2 μ 2 2 b 1 b 2 γ μ 2 = 0 , Y 0 b 2 3 θ 4 b 2 2 μ 2 2 b 2 2 γ μ 2 = 0 .
(41)

The last system gives the three sets of solutions as follows.

The first:

a 0 = ( 8 γ μ 2 + 12 β 8 μ 2 40 β μ 2 + 50 γ 3 μ 2 + 18 θ α 80 μ 2 β 2 16 β γ 2 μ 2 a 0 = 88 μ 2 γ β 2 + 24 β 2 + 32 γ β 2 + 28 γ β + 26 γ 2 μ 2 + 14 γ 2 β 2 + 33 θ α γ + 36 β θ α a 0 = + 18 θ α γ 2 24 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 20 β γ 3 μ 2 68 μ 2 γ β + 23 β γ 2 + 24 μ 2 θ α + 12 μ 2 θ α γ a 0 = + 30 β θ α γ 24 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 6 β θ α γ 2 12 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 8 β γ 4 μ 2 + 3 θ α γ 3 + 30 γ 4 μ 2 a 0 = + 2 β 2 γ 3 + β γ 4 + 6 γ 5 μ 2 + 8 β γ 3 ) a 0 = / { 2 θ ( 12 γ 2 8 γ 2 β 2 3 θ α 7 β 8 γ 3 2 γ 4 + 24 β γ 2 μ 2 + 4 β γ 3 μ 2 a 0 = + 44 μ 2 γ β + 24 β μ 2 2 + 34 γ 2 μ 2 + 14 γ 3 μ 2 + 2 γ 4 μ 2 + 34 γ μ 2 + 12 μ 2 4 γ β 2 a 0 = 2 γ 2 β 2 + 3 θ α γ 2 16 γ β 13 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 ) } , a 1 = b 1 = b 2 = 0 , a 2 = 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ , V = ( 8 γ μ 2 + 4 β 8 μ 2 + 8 β μ 2 + 50 γ 3 μ 2 + 18 θ α + 16 μ 2 β 2 + 76 β γ 2 μ 2 V = + 40 μ 2 γ β 2 4 β 2 8 β 3 18 γ β 2 + 26 γ 2 μ 2 20 γ 2 β 2 12 γ β 3 + 33 θ α γ V = + 24 β θ α + 18 θ α γ 2 + 32 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 52 β γ 3 μ 2 + 44 μ 2 γ β 13 β γ 2 + 24 μ 2 θ α V = + 12 μ 2 θ α γ + 36 β θ α γ 24 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 12 β θ α γ 2 12 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 12 β μ 2 γ 4 V = + 3 θ α γ 3 + 8 γ 3 μ 2 β 2 + 30 γ 4 μ 2 6 β 2 μ 3 3 β γ 4 + 6 γ 5 μ 2 12 β γ 3 4 γ 2 β 3 ) V = / { 6 θ ( 2 γ 3 + 2 γ 3 μ 2 6 γ 2 + 12 γ 2 μ 2 4 β γ 2 + 4 β γ 2 μ 2 6 γ + 3 θ α γ 9 γ β V = 2 γ β 2 + 22 γ μ 2 + 20 μ 2 μ β 7 β 2 β 2 3 θ α + 12 μ 2 + 24 β μ 2 2 ) } , μ 1 = ± 1 4 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 γ 2 4 β 3 γ 2 γ β μ 1 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 1 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 , μ 2 = ± 1 4 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 + γ 2 + 4 β + 3 γ + 2 γ β μ 2 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 2 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 .

The second:

a 0 = ( 8 γ μ 2 + 12 β 8 μ 2 40 β μ 2 + 50 γ 3 μ 2 + 18 θ α 80 μ 2 β 2 16 β γ 2 μ 2 a 0 = 88 μ 2 γ β 2 + 24 β 2 + 32 γ β 2 + 28 γ β + 26 γ 2 μ 2 + 14 γ 2 β 2 + 33 θ α γ + 36 β θ α a 0 = + 18 θ α γ 2 24 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 20 β γ 3 μ 2 68 μ 2 γ β + 23 β γ 2 + 24 μ 2 θ α + 12 μ 2 θ α γ a 0 = + 30 β θ α γ 24 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 6 β θ α γ 2 12 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 8 β γ 4 μ 2 + 3 θ α γ 3 + 30 γ 4 μ 2 a 0 = + 2 β 2 γ 3 + β γ 4 + 6 γ 5 μ 2 + 8 β γ 3 ) a 0 = / { 2 θ ( 12 γ 2 8 γ 2 β 2 3 θ α 7 β 8 γ 3 2 γ 4 + 24 β γ 2 μ 2 + 4 β γ 3 μ 2 a 0 = + 44 μ 2 γ β + 24 β μ 2 2 + 34 γ 2 μ 2 + 14 γ 3 μ 2 + 2 γ 4 μ 2 + 34 γ μ 2 + 12 μ 2 a 0 = 4 γ β 2 2 γ 2 β 2 + 3 θ α γ 2 16 γ β 13 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 ) } , a 1 = a 2 = b 1 = 0 , b 2 = 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ , V = ( 8 γ μ 2 + 4 β 8 μ 2 + 8 β μ 2 + 50 γ 3 μ 2 + 18 θ α + 16 μ 2 β 2 + 76 β γ 2 μ 2 + 40 μ 2 γ β 2 V = 4 β 2 8 β 3 18 γ β 2 + 26 γ 2 μ 2 20 γ 2 β 2 12 γ β 3 + 33 θ α γ + 24 β θ α + 18 θ α γ 2 V = + 32 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 52 β γ 3 μ 2 + 44 μ 2 γ β 13 β γ 2 + 24 μ 2 θ α + 12 μ 2 θ α γ + 36 β θ α γ V = 24 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 12 β θ α γ 2 12 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 12 β μ 2 γ 4 + 3 θ α γ 3 + 8 γ 3 μ 2 β 2 V = + 30 γ 4 μ 2 6 β 2 μ 3 3 β γ 4 + 6 γ 5 μ 2 12 β γ 3 4 γ 2 β 3 ) V = / { 6 θ ( 2 γ 3 + 2 γ 3 μ 2 6 γ 2 + 12 γ 2 μ 2 4 β γ 2 + 4 β γ 2 μ 2 6 γ + 3 θ α γ 9 γ β V = 2 γ β 2 + 22 γ μ 2 + 20 μ 2 μ β 7 β 2 β 2 3 θ α + 12 μ 2 + 24 β μ 2 2 ) } , μ 1 = ± 1 4 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 γ 2 4 β 3 γ 2 γ β μ 1 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 1 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 , μ 2 = ± 1 4 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 + γ 2 + 4 β + 3 γ + 2 γ β μ 2 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 2 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 .

The third:

a 0 = ( 8 γ μ 2 + 3 β 8 μ 2 40 β μ 2 + 50 γ 3 μ 2 + 9 2 θ α 80 μ 2 β 2 16 β γ 2 μ 2 a 0 = 88 μ 2 γ β 2 + 6 β 2 + 8 γ β 2 + 7 γ β + 26 γ 2 μ 2 + 7 2 γ 2 β 2 + 33 4 θ α γ + 9 β θ α a 0 = 24 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 20 β γ 3 μ 2 68 μ 2 γ β + 23 4 β γ 2 + 24 μ 2 θ α + 12 μ 2 θ α γ + 15 2 β θ α γ a 0 = 24 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 3 2 β θ α γ 2 12 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 8 β γ 4 μ 2 + 3 4 θ α γ 3 + 30 γ 4 μ 2 + 1 2 β 2 γ 3 a 0 = + 1 4 β γ 4 + 6 γ 5 μ 2 + 2 β γ 3 ) a 0 = / { θ ( 2 + 16 β γ 3 μ 2 + 176 μ 2 γ β 12 γ 2 8 γ 3 θ α 2 β 2 8 γ 3 2 γ 4 7 β a 0 = + 48 μ 2 + 96 β γ 2 μ 2 + 3 θ α γ 2 16 γ β 13 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 4 γ β 2 2 γ 2 β 2 a 0 = + 136 γ 2 μ 2 + 56 γ 3 μ 2 + 8 γ 4 μ 2 + 136 γ μ 2 + 96 β μ 2 ) } , a 1 = b 1 = 0 , a 2 = b 2 = 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ , V = ( 32 γ μ 2 + 4 β 32 μ 2 + 32 β μ 2 + 200 γ 3 μ 2 + 18 θ α + 64 μ 2 β 2 + 304 β γ 2 μ 2 V = + 160 μ 2 γ β 2 4 β 2 8 β 3 18 γ β 2 + 104 γ 2 μ 2 20 γ 2 β 2 12 γ β 3 + 33 θ α γ V = + 24 β θ α + 18 θ α γ 2 + 128 β 2 γ 2 μ 2 + 208 β γ 3 μ 2 + 176 μ 2 γ β 13 β γ 2 + 96 μ 2 θ α V = + 48 μ 2 θ α γ + 36 β θ α γ 96 μ 2 θ α γ 2 + 12 β θ α γ 2 48 γ 3 μ 2 θ α + 48 β μ 2 γ 4 V = + 3 θ α γ 3 + 32 γ 3 μ 2 β 2 + 120 γ 4 μ 2 6 β 2 μ 3 3 β γ 4 + 24 γ 5 μ 2 12 β γ 3 4 γ 2 β 3 ) V = / { ( 6 θ 8 γ 3 μ 2 2 γ 3 6 γ 2 + 48 γ 2 μ 2 4 β γ 2 + 16 β γ 2 μ 2 6 γ + 3 θ α γ 9 γ β V = 2 γ β 2 + 88 γ μ 2 + 80 μ 2 μ β 7 β 2 β 2 3 θ α + 48 μ 2 + 96 β μ 2 2 ) } , μ 1 = ± 1 8 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 γ 2 4 β 3 γ 2 γ β μ 1 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 1 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 , μ 2 = ± 1 8 ( γ 2 + 3 γ + 2 ) ( ( 2 γ 2 + 6 γ + 4 ) ( 2 + γ 2 + 4 β + 3 γ + 2 γ β μ 1 = + ( 4 16 β + 12 μ + 16 β 2 + 13 γ 2 + 6 γ 3 + γ 4 + 16 γ β 2 32 γ β + 4 γ 2 β 2 μ 1 = 20 β γ 2 4 β γ 3 48 θ α 72 θ α γ 24 θ α γ 2 ) 1 2 ) ) 1 2 .

These in turn give the following three solutions:

u 1 ( x , t ) = a 0 + 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 2 ( x , t ) = a 0 + 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) , u 3 ( x , t ) = a 0 + 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ tanh 2 μ ( x V t ) + 2 μ 2 ( 2 + γ ) θ coth 2 μ ( x V t ) .
(42)

7 Conclusion

In this paper, we focused on travelling wave solutions of the general form of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Peregrine-Burgers equation, the general form of the Oskolkov-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers equation, the one-dimensional Oskolkov equation and the generalised hyperelastic-rod wave equation. We derived various exact travelling wave solutions of these physical structures by using the tanh-coth method. Throughout the work, Maple was used to deal with the tedious algebraic operations.

References

  1. Quarteroni A: Fourier spectral methods for pseudo-parabolic equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1987, 24(2):323-335. 10.1137/0724024

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Korpusov MO, Sveshnikov AG: Blow-up of solutions of strongly nonlinear equations of pseudoparabolic type. J. Math. Sci. 2008, 148(1):1-142. 10.1007/s10958-007-0541-3

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey SA: Numerical solution for nonlocal Sobolev-type differential equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. Conf. 2010, 19: 75-83.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaikina EI, Naumkin PI, Shishmarev IA: The Cauchy problem for an equation of Sobolev type with power non-linearity. Izv. Math. 2005, 69(1):59-111. 10.1070/IM2005v069n01ABEH000521

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Karch G: Asymptotic behaviour of solutions to some pseudoparabolic equations. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 1997, 20: 271-289.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Peregrine DH: Calculations of the development of an undular bore. J. Fluid Mech. 1996, 25: 321-330.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Benjamin TB, Bona JL, Mahony JJ: Model equations for long waves in nonlinear dispersive systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1972, 272: 47-78. 10.1098/rsta.1972.0032

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Camassa R, Holm DD: An integrable shallow water equation with peaked solitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 71(11):1661-1664. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1661

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Meiss J, Horton W: Fluctuation spectra of a drift wave soliton gas. Phys. Fluids 1982., 25: Article ID 1838

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yam C: Regularized long wave equation and inverse scattering transform. J. Math. Phys. 1993., 34: Article ID 2618

    Google Scholar 

  11. Musette M, Lambert F, Decuyper J: Soliton and antisoliton resonant interactions. J. Phys. A 1987., 20: Article ID 6223

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rollins D: Painlevé analysis and Lie group symmetries of the regularized long-wave equation. J. Math. Phys. 1991., 32: Article ID 3331

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bona J, Pritchard W, Scott L: Solitary-wave interaction. Phys. Fluids 1980., 23: Article ID 438

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kodama Y: On solitary-wave interaction. Phys. Lett. A 1987., 123: Article ID 276

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hereman W, Banerjee P, Korpel A, Assanto G, Van Immerzeele A, Meerpoel A: J. Phys. A. 1986., 19: Article ID 607

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oskolkov AP: Nonlocal problems for one class of nonlinear operator equations that arise in the theory of Sobolev-type equations. Zap. Nauč. Semin. POMI 1991, 198: 31-48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oskolkov AP: On stability theory for solutions of semilinear dissipative equations of the Sobolev type. Zap. Nauč. Semin. POMI 1992, 200: 139-148.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Camassa R, Holm DD, Hyman J: A new integrable shallow water equation. Adv. Appl. Mech. 1994, 31: 1-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parkes EJ, Vakhnenko VO: Explicit solutions of the Camassa-Holm equation. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 26(5):1309-1316. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.03.011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wazwaz AM: New solitary wave solutions to the modified forms of Degasperis-Procesi and Camassa-Holm equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 186: 130-141. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.092

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson RS: Camassa-Holm, Korteweg-de Vries and related models for water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 2002, 455: 63.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson RS: The classical problem of water waves: a reservoir of integrable and nearly-integrable equations. J. Nonlinear Math. Phys. 2003., 10: Article ID 72 (Suppl. 1)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Amfilokhiev VB, Voitkunskii YI, Mazaeva NP, Khodorkovskii YS: Flows of polymer solutions in the case of convective accelerations. Tr. Leningr. Korablestroit. Inst. 1975, 96: 3-9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sviridyuk GA, Yakupov MM: The phase space of Cauchy-Dirichlet problem for a nonclassical equation. Differ. Uravn. (Minsk) 2003, 39(11):1556-1561.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coclite GM, Holden H, Karlsen KH: Global weak solutions to a generalized hyperelastic-rod wave equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 2005, 37(4):1044-1069. 10.1137/040616711

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Dulin HR, Gottwald GA, Holm DD: On asymptotically equivalent shallow water wave equations. Physica D 2004, 190: 1. 10.1016/j.physd.2003.11.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Whitham GB: Variational methods and applications to water wave. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1967, 299: 625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fornberg B, Whitham GB: A numerical and theoretical study of certain nonlinear wave phenomena. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 1978, 289: 373-404. 10.1098/rsta.1978.0064

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Gözükızıl ÖF, Akçağıl Ş: Exact solutions of Benjamin-Bona-Mahony-Burgers-type nonlinear pseudo-parabolic equations. Bound. Value Probl. 2012, 2012: 144. 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gözükızıl ÖF, Akçağıl Ş: Travelling wave solutions to the Benney-Luke and the higher-order improved Boussinesq equations of Sobolev type. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: Article ID 890574

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wazwaz AM, Helal MA: Nonlinear variants of the BBM equation with compact and noncompact physical structures. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2005, 26(3):767-776. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.01.044

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Wazwaz AM: Two reliable methods for solving variants of the KdV equation with compact and non compact structures. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2006, 28(2):454-462. 10.1016/j.chaos.2005.06.004

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dedicated to Professor Hari M Srivastava.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ömer Faruk Gözükızıl.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gözükızıl, Ö.F., Akçağıl, Ş. The tanh-coth method for some nonlinear pseudoparabolic equations with exact solutions. Adv Differ Equ 2013, 143 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-143

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-1847-2013-143

Keywords