- Research
- Open access
- Published:
On Poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind with umbral calculus viewpoint
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2015, Article number: 27 (2015)
Abstract
Poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind were introduced in Kim et al. (Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014:219, 2014) as a generalization of the Bernoulli polynomial of the second kind. Here we investigate those polynomials and derive further results about them by using umbral calculus.
1 Introduction
Following Kaneko [1], the poly-Bernoulli polynomials have been studied by many researchers in recent decades. Poly-Bernoulli polynomials \(B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) were defined as \(\frac {Li_{k}(1-e^{-t})}{1-e^{-t}}e^{xt}=\sum_{n\geq0}B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\frac {t^{n}}{n!}\), where \(Li_{k}(x)=\sum_{r\geq1} \frac{x^{r}}{r^{k}}\) is the classical polylogarithm function, which satisfies \(\frac{d}{dx}Li_{k}(x)=\frac{1}{x}Li_{k-1}(x)\). The poly-Bernoulli polynomials have wide-ranging applications in mathematics and applied mathematics (see [2–4]). For \(k\in \mathbb{Z}\), the poly-Bernoulli polynomials \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) of the second kind are given by the generating function
When \(x=0\), \(b_{n}^{(k)}=b_{n}^{(k)}(0)\) are called the poly-Bernoulli numbers of the second kind. When \(k=1\), \(b_{n}(x)=b_{n}^{(1)}(x)\) are called the Bernoulli polynomial of the second kind (see [5–11]). Poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind were introduced as a generalization of the Bernoulli polynomial of the second kind (see [12]). The aim of this paper is to use umbral calculus to obtain several new and interesting explicit formulas, recurrence relations and identities of poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind. Umbral calculus has been used in numerous problems of mathematics. Umbral techniques have been of use in different areas of physics; for example it is used in group theory and quantum mechanics by Biedenharn et al. (see [13–15]).
Let Πbe the algebra of polynomials in a single variable x over ℂ and let \(\Pi^{*}\) be the vector space of all linear functionals on Π. We denote the action of a linear functional L on a polynomial \(p(x)\) by \(\langle L|p(x)\rangle\). Define the vector space structure on \(\Pi^{*}\) by \(\langle cL+c'L'|p(x)\rangle=c\langle L|p(x)\rangle+c'\langle L'|p(x)\rangle\), where \(c,c'\in\mathbb{C}\) (see [16–19]). We define the algebra of a formal power series in a single variable t to be
The formal power series in the variable t defines a linear functional on Πby setting \(\langle f(t)|x^{n}\rangle=a_{n}\), for all \(n\geq0\) (see [16–19]). Thus
where \(\delta_{n,k}\) is the Kronecker symbol. Let \(f_{L}(t)=\sum_{n\geq 0}\langle L|x^{n}\rangle\frac{t^{n}}{n!}\). By (1.3), we have \(\langle f_{L}(t)|x^{n}\rangle=\langle L|x^{n}\rangle\). Thus, the map \(L\mapsto f_{L}(t)\) is a vector space isomorphism from \(\Pi^{*}\) onto â„‹. Therefore, â„‹ is thought of as a set of both formal power series and linear functionals. We call â„‹ the umbral algebra. The umbral calculus is the study of the umbral algebra.
Let \(f(t)\) be a non-zero power series, the order \(O(f(t))\) is the smallest integer k for which the coefficient of \(t^{k}\) does not vanish. If \(O(f(t))=1\) (respectively, \(O(f(t))=0\)), then \(f(t)\) is called a delta (respectively, an invertable) series. Suppose that \(f(t)\) is a delta series and \(g(t)\) is an invertable series, then there exists a unique sequence \(s_{n}(x)\) of polynomials such that \(\langle g(t)(f(t))^{k}|s_{n}(x)\rangle=n!\delta_{n,k}\), where \(n,k\geq0\). The sequence \(s_{n}(x)\) is called the Sheffer sequence for \((g(t),f(t))\) which is denoted by \(s_{n}(x)\sim(g(t),f(t))\) (see [18, 19]). For \(f(t)\in\mathcal{H}\) and \(p(x)\in\Pi\), we have \(\langle e^{yt}|p(x)\rangle=p(y)\), \(\langle f(t)g(t)|p(x)\rangle =\langle g(t)|f(t)p(x)\rangle\), and \(f(t)=\sum_{n\geq0}\langle f(t)|x^{n}\rangle\frac{t^{n}}{n!}\) and \(p(x)=\sum_{n\geq0}\langle t^{n}|p(x)\rangle\frac{x^{n}}{n!}\) (see [18, 19]). Thus, we obtain \(\langle t^{k}|p(x)\rangle=p^{(k)}(0)\) and \(\langle1|p^{(k)}(x)\rangle =p^{(k)}(0)\), where \(p^{(k)}(0)\) denotes the kth derivative of \(p(x)\) with respect to x at \(x=0\). Therefore, we get \(t^{k}p(x)=p^{(k)}(x)=\frac{d^{k}}{dx^{k}}p(x)\), for all \(k\geq0\) (see [18, 19]). Thus, for \(s_{n}(x)\sim(g(t),f(t))\), we have
for all \(y\in\mathbb{C}\), where \(\bar{f}(t)\) is the compositional inverse of \(f(t)\) (see [18, 19]). For \(s_{n}(x)\sim(g(t),f(t))\) and \(r_{n}(x)\sim(h(t),\ell(t))\), let \(s_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n} c_{n,k}r_{k}(x)\), then we have
It is immediate from (1.1) and (1.4) to see that \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) is the Sheffer polynomial for the pair \(g(x)=\frac {t}{Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}\) and \(f(t)=e^{t}-1\), that is,
The aim of the present paper is to present several new identities for the poly-Bernoulli polynomials by the use of umbral calculus.
2 Explicit expressions
Before proceeding, we observe that
where \(S_{2}(n,k)\) is the Stirling number of the second kind, which is defined by the identity \(x^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}S_{2}(n,k)(x)_{k}\) with \((x)_{0}=1\) and \((x)_{k}=x(x-1)\cdots(x-k+1)\). This shows
Thus,
which implies that
Now, we are ready to present several formulas for the nth poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind.
Theorem 2.1
For all \(n\geq1\),
Proof
Since \(x^{n}\sim(1,t)\) and \(\frac{t}{Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}b_{n}^{(k)}(x)\sim (1,e^{t}-1)\) (see (1.6)), we obtain
Thus, by (2.3) we have
which completes the proof. □
Let \(S_{1}(n,k)\) be the Stirling number of the first kind, which is defined by the identity \((x)_{n}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}S_{1}(n,k)x^{k}\). Now, we are ready to present our second explicit formula.
Theorem 2.2
For all \(n\geq0\),
Proof
Note that \((x)_{n}=\sum_{j=0}^{n}S_{1}(n,j)x^{j}\sim(1,e^{t}-1)\). So, by (1.6) we have \(\frac{t}{Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}b_{n}^{(k)}(x)\sim(1,e^{t}-1)\), which implies that
Thus, by (2.3) and using the arguments in the proof of Theorem 2.1, we obtain the required formula. □
For the next explicit formula, we use the conjugation representation, namely (1.5).
Theorem 2.3
For all \(n\geq0\),
Proof
By (1.5) and (1.6), we have \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}c_{n,j}x^{j}\), where
If \(j=0\), then \(c_{n,0}=b_{n}^{(k)}\). Thus, assume now that \(1\leq j\leq n\). So
which, by (2.1), implies that
which completes the proof. □
In order to state our next formula, we recall that \(b_{n}(x)=b_{n}^{(1)}(x)\) is the Bernoulli polynomial of the second kind, which is given by the generating function \(\frac{t}{\log(1+t)}(1+t)^{x}=\sum_{n\geq 0}b_{n}(x)\frac{t^{n}}{n!}\).
Theorem 2.4
For all \(n\geq0\),
where \(B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) is the nth poly-Bernoulli polynomial.
Proof
From the definitions, we have
Since \(B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) is the poly-Bernoulli polynomial given by the generating function \(\frac{Li_{k}(1-e^{-t})}{1-e^{-t}} e^{xt}=\sum_{n\geq0}B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\frac {t^{n}}{n!}\), we have \(\frac{Li_{k}(1-e^{-t})}{1-e^{-t}}x^{n}=B_{n}^{(k)}(x)\) and \(\frac{d}{dx}B_{n}^{(k)}(x)=nB_{n-1}^{(k)}(x)\). Thus \(b_{n}^{(k)}(y)=\sum_{\ell=0}^{n}\binom{n}{\ell} b_{\ell}(y) \langle \frac{e^{-t}-1}{-t}|B_{n-\ell}^{(k)}(x) \rangle\). By the fact that \(\langle f(at)|p(x)\rangle=\langle f(t)|p(ax)\rangle\) for constant a (see Proposition 2.1.11 in [19]), we obtain
Note that \(\langle\frac{e^{t}-1}{t}|B_{n-\ell}^{(k)}(-x) \rangle=\int_{0}^{1}B_{n-\ell}^{(k)}(-u)\,du=\frac{1}{n+1-\ell}(B_{n+1-\ell}^{(k)}-B_{n+1-\ell}^{(k)}(-1))\), which leads to
which completes the proof. □
Theorem 2.5
For all \(n\geq0\),
Proof
By using a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.4, we obtain
which, by (2.2), gives
as required. □
Note that the statement of Theorem 2.5 has been obtained in Theorem 2.2 of [12].
3 Recurrence relations
By (1.6) we have \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)\sim (\frac {t}{Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})},e^{t}-1 )\) with \(P_{n}(x)=\frac {t}{Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=(x)_{n}=x(x-1)\cdots(x-n+1)\sim (1,e^{t}-1)\). Thus,
The aim of this section is to derive recurrence relations for the poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind. As first trivial recurrence, by using the fact that if \(S_{n}(x)\sim(g(t),f(t))\) then \(f(t)S_{n}(x)=nS_{n-1}(x)\), we derive that \((e^{t}-1)b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=nb_{n-1}^{(k)}(x)\), and hence \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x+1)=b_{n}^{(k)}(x)+nb_{n-1}^{(k)}(x)\). Our next results establish other types of recurrence relations.
Theorem 3.1
For all \(n\geq0\),
Proof
It is well known that if \(S_{n}(x)\sim(g(t),f(t))\) then \(S_{n+1}(x)=(x-\frac{g'(t)}{g(t)})\frac{1}{f'(t)}S_{n}(x)\). Hence, by (1.6), we have
with
where \(1-\frac {te^{t}e^{1-e^{t}}Li_{k-1}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}{(1-e^{1-e^{t}})Li_{k}(1-e^{1-e^{t}})}\) has order at least one. Thus, by (2.4), we get
where
and
Thus,
which completes the proof. □
Theorem 3.2
For all \(n\geq0\), \(\frac{d}{dx}b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=n!\sum_{\ell=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{n-1-\ell }}{\ell!(n-\ell)}b_{\ell}^{(k)}(x)\).
Proof
We proceed in the proof by using the fact that if \(S_{n}(x)\sim (g(t),f(t))\) then
By (1.6), we have \(\langle\bar{f}(t)|x^{n-\ell}\rangle=\langle \log(1+t)|x^{n-\ell}\rangle\), which leads to
Thus \(\frac{d}{dx}b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=n!\sum_{\ell=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{n-1-\ell }}{\ell!(n-\ell)}b_{\ell}^{(k)}(x)\), as required. □
Theorem 3.3
For all \(n\geq1\),
Proof
Let \(n\geq1\). Then (1.6), we have
The first term in (3.1) is given by
For the second term in (3.1), we note that
which has order at least zero. So, the second term in (3.1) is given by
By substituting (3.2) and (3.3) into (3.1), we complete the proof. □
4 Identities
In this section we present some identities related to poly-Bernoulli numbers of the second kind.
Theorem 4.1
For all \(n\geq0\),
Proof
We compute \(A=\langle Li_{k}(1-e^{-t})|x^{n+1}\rangle\) in two different ways. On the one hand, by (1.6), it is
On the other hand, by (1.6), it is
By comparing (4.1) and (4.2), we obtain the required identity. □
By using similar techniques as in the proof of Theorem 4.1 with computing
in two different ways, we obtain the following result (we leave the proof as an exercise to the interested reader).
Theorem 4.2
For all \(n-1\geq m\geq1\),
Let \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=\sum_{m=0}^{n} c_{n,m}(x)_{m}\). By (1.5), (1.6) and the fact that \((x)_{m}\sim(1,e^{t}-1)\), we obtain
which leads to the following identity.
Theorem 4.3
For all \(n\geq0\),
Let \(\mathbb{B}_{n}^{(s)}(x)\) be the nth Bernoulli polynomial of order s. Then \(\mathbb{B}_{n}^{(s)}(x)\sim(((e^{t}-1)/t)^{s},t)\). Also, the Bernoulli numbers of the second kind of order s are given by \(\frac{t^{s}}{\log^{s}(1+t)}=\sum_{j\geq0}\mathbf{b}_{j}^{(s)}\frac{t^{j}}{j!}\) and let \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=\sum_{m=0}^{n} c_{n,m}\mathbb{B}_{m}^{(s)}(x)\). By (1.5) and (1.6), we obtain
which gives the following identity.
Theorem 4.4
For all \(n\geq0\),
Define \(H_{n}^{(s)}(\lambda,x)\) to be the nth Frobenius-Euler polynomials of order s. Note that these polynomial satisfy \(H_{n}^{(s)}(\lambda,x)\sim(((e^{t}-\lambda)/(1-\lambda))^{s},t)\). Let \(b_{n}^{(k)}(x)=\sum_{m=0}^{n} c_{n,m}H_{m}^{(s)}(\lambda,x)\). By (1.5) and (1.6), we obtain
which gives the following identity.
Theorem 4.5
For all \(n\geq0\),
References
Kaneko, M: Poly-Bernoulli numbers. J. Théor. Nr. Bordx. 9, 221-228 (1997)
Kim, DS, Kim, T, Lee, S-H: Poly-Cauchy numbers and polynomials with umbral calculus viewpoint. Int. J. Math. Anal. 7(45-48), 2235-2253 (2013)
Kim, T: Higher-order Cauchy of the second kind and poly-Cauchy of the second kind mixed type polynomials. Ars Comb. 115, 435-451 (2014)
Zhao, F-Z: Some results for generalized Cauchy numbers. Util. Math. 82, 269-284 (2010)
Araci, S, Acikgoz, M: A note on the Frobenius-Euler numbers and polynomials associated with Bernstein polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 22(3), 399-406 (2012)
Gzyl, H: Hamilton Flows and Evolution Semigroups. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, vol. 239 (1990)
Jolany, H, Sharifi, H, Alikelaye, RE: Some results for the Apostol-Genocchi polynomials of higher order. Bull. Malays. Math. Soc. 36(2), 465-479 (2013)
Qi, F: An integral representation, complete monotonicity, and inequalities of Cauchy numbers of the second kind. J. Number Theory 144, 244-255 (2014)
Nemes, G: An asymptotic expansion for the Bernoulli numbers of the second kind. J. Integer Seq. 14(4), Article 11.4.8 (2011)
Kim, T: Identities involving Laguerre polynomials derived from umbral calculus. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 21(1), 36-45 (2014)
Zachos, CK: Umbral deformations on discrete space-time. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 23(13), 2005-2014 (2008)
Kim, T, Kwon, H-I, Lee, S-H, Seo, J-J: A note on poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials of the second kind. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, Article ID 219 (2014)
Biedenharn, LC, Gustafson, RA, Lohe, MA, Louck, JD, Milne, SC: Special functions and group theory in theoretical physics. In: Special Functions: Group Theoretical Aspects and Applications. Math. Appl., pp. 129-162. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)
Dattoli, G, Levi, D, Winternitz, P: Heisenberg algebra, umbral calculus and orthogonal polynomials. J. Math. Phys. 49(5), 053509 (2008)
Blasiak, P, Dattoli, G, Horzela, A, Penson, KA: Representations of monomiality principle with Sheffer-type polynomials and boson normal ordering. Phys. Lett. A 352, 7-12 (2006)
Kim, DS, Kim, T: Applications of umbral calculus associated with p-adic invariant integrals on \(\mathbb{Z}_{p}\). Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, Article ID 865721 (2012)
Kim, DS, Kim, T: Some identities of Frobenius-Euler polynomials arising from umbral calculus. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2012, Article ID 196 (2012)
Roman, S: More on the umbral calculus, with emphasis on the q-umbral calculus. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 107, 222-254 (1985)
Roman, S: The Umbral Calculus. Dover, New York (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by Kwangwoon University in 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, D.S., Kim, T., Mansour, T. et al. On Poly-Bernoulli polynomials of the second kind with umbral calculus viewpoint. Adv Differ Equ 2015, 27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0362-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0362-5