- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Multiple periodic orbits of high-dimensional differential delay systems
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2019, Article number: 488 (2019)
Abstract
In this paper, we consider differential delay systems of the form
in which the coefficients of the nonlinear terms with different hysteresis have different signs. Such systems have not been studied before. The multiplicity of the periodic orbits is related to the eigenvalues of the limit matrix. The results provide a theoretical basis for the study of differential delay systems.
1 Introduction
We consider the asymptotically linear differential delay system
where
and there are real symmetric matrices \(A_{0},A_{\infty}\in R^{N\times N}\) such that
In the past several decades, many papers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] have studied the existence of periodic solutions of delay differential equations. In 1974, Kaplan and Yorke [15] studied the multiple periodic solutions of the equations
and
by transforming them respectively into associated systems of ordinary differential equations and then making analysis by qualitative approaches. Meanwhile, they guessed that there should exist \(2(n+1)\)-periodic solutions to the equation
where \(f\in C^{0}(R,R)\) with \(f(-x)=-f(x)\), \(xf(x)>0\), \(x\neq0\). This was proved in [17]. On the basis of this work, Fei [3, 4] studied the multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations via Hamiltonian systems. Li and He [10,11,12] studied the multiple solutions by an asymptotically linear Hamiltonian system. Guo and Yu [13, 14] gave some multiple results for periodic solutions via critical point theory.
In this paper, our main purpose is to study system (1.1), in which the coefficients of nonlinear terms corresponding to different hysteresis have different signs, which is an extension of [3]. To construct the even functional, the variation structure here is much simpler since we do not transform system (1.1) into a \(2kN\)-dimensional system. At the same time, according to the variational method and the method of Kaplan–Yorke coupling system, we get an exact counting method of the number of 4k-periodic orbits. Moreover, our results are easier to examine by introducing the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrices \(A_{\infty}\) and \(A_{0}\).
Let
be the eigenvalues of \(A_{0}\) and \(A_{\infty}\), respectively, and let \(u_{1},u_{2},\ldots,u_{N}\) and \(v_{1},v_{2},\ldots,v_{N}\) be the corresponding unit eigenvectors in space. For convenience, we make the following assumptions:
- \((f_{1})\):
- \((f_{2})\):
there are \(M>0\) and a function \(r\in C^{0}(R^{+},R^{+})\) satisfying \(r(s)\rightarrow\infty\) and \(r(s)/s\rightarrow0 \) as \(s\rightarrow\infty\) such that
$$\biggl\vert F(x)-\frac{1}{2}(A_{\infty} x,x) \biggr\vert >r \bigl( \vert x \vert \bigr)-M, $$- \((f_{3}^{\pm})\):
\(\pm[F(x)-\frac{1}{2}(A_{\infty} x,x)]>0\), \(|x|\rightarrow \infty\),
- \((f_{4}^{\pm})\):
\(\pm[F(x)-\frac{1}{2}(A_{0} x,x)]>0\), \(0<|x|\ll1\).
2 Variational structure
Let
and define \(P:X\rightarrow L^{2}\) by
and the inverse of P as
Define
Then \((X,\|\cdot\|)\) is an \(H^{\frac{1}{2}}_{4k}([0,4k],R^{N})\) space.
For system (1.1), define the following functional \(\varPhi :X\rightarrow R\):
where
Let
Then we have
On the basis of Theorem 1.4 in [18], we can get that the differential of Φ satisfies
where \(K(x)=P^{-1}\nabla F(x)\).
For convenience of further calculations, we can also make a more detailed division of space X by introducing the eigenvalues and eigenvectors mentioned before.
Suppose that
Then we have
and
Therefore from (2.2) we find that if
then
On the other hand, when
we have
Then we can get
Similarly,
3 Division of space X and lemmas
Let
It is easy to see that \(\dim X_{\infty}^{0}<\infty \) and \(\dim X_{0}^{0}<\infty\).
Lemma 3.1
([3], Lemma 2.4)
SupposeXis a Hilbert space, \(\varPhi:X\rightarrow R\)is a differentiable functional, and \(L:X\rightarrow X\)is a linear operator. Then there are two closed \(S^{1}\)-invariant linear subspaces \(X^{+}\)and \(X^{-}\)such that
- (a)
\(X^{+}\cup X^{-}\)is closed and of finite codimension inX,
- (b)
\(\widehat{L}(X^{-})\subset X^{-}\), \(\widehat{L}=L+P^{-1}A_{0}\)or \(\widehat{L}=L+P^{-1}A_{\infty} \),
- (c)
there exists \(c_{0}\in R\)such that
$$\inf_{x\in X^{+}}\varPhi(x)\geq c_{0}, $$ - (d)
there is \(c_{\infty}\in R\)such that
$$\varPhi(x)\leq c_{\infty}< \varPhi(0)=0,\quad \forall x\in X^{-} \cap S_{r}=\bigl\{ x\in X^{-}:\|x\|=r\bigr\} , $$ - (e)
Φsatisfies the \((P.S)_{c}\)-condition for \(c_{0}< c< c_{\infty }\), that is, every \(\{x_{n}\}\subseteq X\)satisfying \(\varPhi (x_{n})\rightarrow c\)and \(\varPhi'(x_{n})\rightarrow0\)has a convergent subsequence. ThenΦhas at least \(\frac{1}{2}[\dim(X^{+}\cap X^{-})-\operatorname{codim}_{X}(X^{+}\cup X^{-})]\)generally different critical orbits in \(\varPhi^{-1}([c_{0},c_{\infty}])\)if
$$\bigl[\dim \bigl(X^{+}\cap X^{-} \bigr)- \operatorname{codim}_{X} \bigl(X^{+}\cup X^{-} \bigr) \bigr]>0. $$
Lemma 3.2
There exists \(\sigma>0\) such that
and
Proof
Let
Then \(X=\sum_{j=1}^{N}X_{\infty j}\). We need to consider two cases, \(\beta_{j}\geq0\) and \(\beta_{j}< 0\). In the following part, we just give the proof for \(\beta_{j}\geq0\), as the other case is similar.
For \(\beta_{j}\geq0\), \(i\in\{0,1,\ldots,k-1\}\), and \(x\in X_{\infty j}\),
where \(h^{+}(i)=\max \{h\in N:-\frac{(4hk+2i+1)\pi}{2k}\cot\frac{(2i+1)\pi}{4k} +\beta_{j}>0 \}\), and
where \(h^{-}(i)=\min \{h\in N:-\frac{(4hk+2i+1)\pi}{2k}\cot\frac{(2i+1)\pi }{4k}+\beta_{j}<0 \}\).
Then we can choose
and let \(\sigma_{j}=\min\{\sigma_{0},\sigma_{1},\ldots,\sigma_{k-1}\} >0\), and then let \(\sigma=\min\{\sigma_{j}:j=1,2,\ldots,N\}\). The proof is over. □
Lemma 3.3
If \((f_{1})\)and \((f_{2})\)hold, then the functionalΦgiven by (2.1) satisfies the \((P.S)\)-condition.
Proof
Let Π, Λ, and Γ be the orthogonal mappings from X to \(X_{\infty}^{+}\), \(X_{\infty}^{-}\), and \(X_{\infty}^{0}\), respectively. From (1.3) we get
for some \(\widetilde{M}>0\).
Suppose that \(\{x_{n}\}\subset X\) is a subsequence such that \(\varPhi '(x_{n})\rightarrow0\) and \(\varPhi(x_{n})\) is bounded. Let \(w_{n}=\varPi x_{n}\), \(y_{n}=\varLambda x_{n}\), and \(z_{n}=\varGamma x_{n}\). Then
From
and (3.1) we have
Then we get that \(w_{n}\) is bounded. Similarly, \(y_{n}\) is bounded. Meanwhile, from \((f_{2})\) we get
Then \(\|z_{n}\|\) is bounded since \(\varPhi(x_{n})\) is bounded. So, \(\|x_{n}\| \) is bounded.
Furthermore, from (2.4) we have
Then we can suppose without loss of generality that \(K (x_{n})\rightarrow\eta\) because K is compact and \(x_{n}\) is bounded. Then
Meanwhile, we can easily see that the dimension of \(X_{\infty}^{0}\) is finite, so we can suppose that \(z_{n}\rightarrow\varphi\) as \(z_{n}\) is bounded. Hence
and the \((P.S)\)-condition is proved. □
Lemma 3.4
Ifxis a critical point ofΦ, then it is a solution to system (1.4).
Proof
Suppose x is a critical point of Φ given by (2.1). Then \(x(t)\) satisfies
Consequently,
Calculating (3.5_1) − (3.5_2) + (3.5_3) −⋯+ (3.5_\((2k-1)\)), we have
that is,
and hence x is a solution of (1.1). □
4 Main results
Denote
and
Theorem 4.1
System (1.1) has at least
4k-periodic orbits when \((f_{1})\)and \((f_{2})\)hold.
Proof
Without loss of generality, we suppose
Then letting \(X^{+}=X_{\infty}^{+}\) and \(X^{-}=X_{0}^{-}\), we get
Obviously,
which means that the codimension of \((X^{+}\cup X^{-})\) is finite. For each \(x\in X(i)\), we have \((L+P^{-1}A_{\infty})x\in X(i)\). The \((PS)\)-condition is satisfied by Lemma 3.3. Moreover, from (1.3) we get \(|F(x)-\frac{1}{2}(A_{\infty }x,x)|<\frac{1}{4}\sigma\|x\|^{2}+M_{1}\), \(x\in R^{N}\), for some \(M_{1}>0\), and from Lemma 3.2 we know that there exists \(\sigma>0\) such that \(\langle(L+P^{-1}A_{\infty})x,x \rangle>\sigma\|x\| ^{2}\), \(x\in X_{\infty}^{+}\). Then
for \(x\in X^{+}\). Therefore there exists \(c_{0}\in R\) such that
Similarly, we get that there exist \(r,\sigma>0\) such that \(|F(x)-\frac{1}{2}(A_{0}x,x)|<\frac{1}{4}\sigma\|x\|^{2}\), \(\|x\|=r\). Then
for \(x\in X^{-}\). This means that there exist \(r>0\) and \(c_{\infty}<0\), such that
On the other hand, for \(i\in\{0,1,\ldots,k-1\}\),
and
Hence we have that
when \(h\geq0\) is large enough. So there is \(M>0\) such that
Then
Then we have
and
Therefore
□
Theorem 4.2
System (1.1) possesses at least
4k-periodic orbits when \((f_{1})\), \((f_{2})\), \((f_{3}^{+})\), and \((f_{4}^{-})\)hold.
Proof
Let \(X^{+}=X_{\infty}^{+}+X_{\infty}^{0}\) and \(X^{-}=X_{-}^{0}+X_{0}^{0}\). The verification of conditions (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) is similar to Theorem 4.1, so we can assume that (4.1) still holds. Let \(X_{\infty}^{0}(i)=X_{\infty }^{0}\cap X(i)\) and \(X_{0}^{0}(i)=X_{0}^{0}\cap X(i)\). Then
□
Theorem 4.3
System (1.1) possesses at least
4k-periodic orbits when \((f_{1})\), \((f_{2})\), \((f_{3}^{-})\), and \((f_{4}^{+})\)hold.
The proof is almost the same as that of Theorem 4.2, and we omit it.
5 Example
Assume that \(F\in C^{1}(R^{2},R)\) satisfies
We are to discuss the multiplicity of 12-periodic solutions of the equation
In this case, \(k=3\), \(\alpha_{1}=\pi\), \(\alpha_{2}=-3\pi\), \(\beta_{1}=3\pi\), \(\beta_{2}=\pi\). Then
According to Theorem 4.2, we get that Eq. (5.1) has at least 16 different 12-periodic orbits satisfying \(x(t-6)=-x(t)\).
References
Benci, V.: On critical point theory for indefinite functionals in the presence of symmetries. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 274(2), 533–572 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1982-0675067-X
Fannio, L.: Multiple periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems with strong resonance at infinity. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Ser. A 3, 251–264 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.1997.3.251
Fei, G.: Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations via Hamiltonian systems (I). Nonlinear Anal. TMA 65, 25–39 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.06.011
Fei, G.: Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations via Hamiltonian systems (II). Nonlinear Anal. TMA 65, 40–58 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.06.012
Ge, W.: Periodic solutions of the differential delay equation \(x'(t)=-f(x(t-1))\). Acta Math. Sin. Engl. Ser. 12, 113–121 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02108151
Ge, W., Mawhin, J.: Positive solutions to boundary value problems for second order ordinary differential equations with singular nonlinearities. Results Math. 34(1–2), 108–119 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03322042
Ge, W.: Existence of exactly \(n+1\) simple 4-periodic solutions of the differential delay equation \(\dot{x}(t) = - f(x(t - 1))\). Acta Math. Sin. 10(1), 80–87 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02561551
Ge, W.: Oscillatory periodic solutions of differential delay equations with multiple lags. Chin. Sci. Bull. 42(6), 444–447 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02882587
Ge, W., Zhang, L.: Multiple periodic solutions of delay differential systems with \(2k-1\) lags via variational approach. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 36(9), 4925–4943 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3034/dcds.2016013
Li, J., He, X.: Multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations created by asymptotically linear Hamiltonian systems. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 31, 45–54 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(96)00058-2
Li, J., He, X.: Proof and generalization of Kaplan–Yorke’s conjecture under the condition \(f'(0)>0\) on periodic solution of differential delay equations. Sci. China Ser. A, Math. 42(9), 957–964 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02880387
Li, J., He, X., Liu, Z.: Hamiltonian symmetric group and multiple periodic solutions of differential delay equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 35, 457–474 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00623-8
Guo, Z., Yu, J.: Multiple results on periodic solutions to delay differential equations via critical point theory. J. Differ. Equ. 218, 15–35 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2005.08.007
Guo, Z., Yu, J.: Multiple results on periodic solutions to higher dimensional differential equations with multiple delays. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 23, 1029–1052 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-011-9228-z
Kaplan, J., Yorke, J.: Ordinary differential equations which yield periodic solutions of differential delay equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 48, 317–324 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(74)90162-0
Li, L., Xue, C., Ge, W.: Periodic orbits to Kaplan–Yorke like differential delay equations with two lags of ratio \((2k-1)/2\). Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, Article ID 247 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-016-0967-3
Nussbaum, R.: Periodic solutions of special differential delay equations: an example in nonlinear functional analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 81(1–2), 131–151 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S03082-10500010490
Mawhin, J., Willem, M.: Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, New York (1989)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the referees for carefully reading the manuscript and for their valuable suggestions, which have significantly improved the paper.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this paper as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Funding
The present research is supported by the National Science Foundations of China (No. 11601493).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, Z., Ge, W. & Li, L. Multiple periodic orbits of high-dimensional differential delay systems. Adv Differ Equ 2019, 488 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2427-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-019-2427-3