- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Two problems of binomial sums involving harmonic numbers
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2021, Article number: 224 (2021)
Abstract
Two open problems recently proposed by Xi and Luo (Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021:38, 2021) are resolved by evaluating explicitly three binomial sums involving harmonic numbers, that are realized mainly by utilizing the generating function method and symmetric functions.
1 Introduction and outline
Denote by \(\mathbb{N}\) the set of natural numbers with \(\mathbb{N}_{0}=\mathbb{N}\cup \{0\}\). For an indeterminate x, define the rising and falling factorials by \((x)_{0}=\langle {x}\rangle _{0}\equiv 1\) and
The harmonic numbers of higher order are given by
In order to reduce lengthy expressions, we shall employ the notations of elementary and complete symmetric functions. For a finite set S of real numbers, we define these functions by \(\Phi _{0}(x|S)=\Psi _{0}(x|S)\equiv 1\) and
We shall also need the signless Stirling numbers of the first kind (see [6]) which are determined by the connection coefficient of expanding the shifted factorials into monomials
There exist numerous summation formulae involving harmonic numbers (cf. [1–3, 7, 8]). In a recent paper [9], Xi and Luo proposed the following two open problems.
Problem I
Let x be an indeterminate. For \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}_{0}\) with \(m>n\), how to calculate the combinatorial sums
Problem II
Let x be an indeterminate. For \(m,n,\lambda ,\rho \in \mathbb{N}_{0}\), what are the combinatorial sums
The first binomial sum in Problem I can easily be evaluated by the Chu–Vandermonde convolution formula as follows:
As the primary motivation, the aim of the present paper is to resolve these problems and evaluate the remaining three sums explicitly in the following theorems.
Theorem 1
Let x be an indeterminate. Then for \(m,n\in \mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following algebraic identity holds:
We remark that when \(m>n\), this theorem evaluates the second sum in Problem I by determining the polynomial part of the rational function explicitly as in the last line, which vanishes for \(m\le n\), instead.
Theorem 2
Let x be an indeterminate. Then for \(m,n,\lambda \in \mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following algebraic identity holds:
Theorem 3
Let x be an indeterminate. Then for \(m,n,\lambda ,\rho \in \mathbb{N}_{0}\), the following algebraic identity holds:
The rest paper will be organized as follows. In the next section, we shall prove Theorem 1 by determining explicitly the polynomial part of a rational function when its numerator degree is greater than that of the denominator. Then Theorems 2 and 3 will be shown in Sect. 3 by establishing two analytical formulae of the derivatives of higher order for a polynomial function of the rising factorial and its reciprocal. The informed reader will notice that by employing symmetric functions Φ and Ψ, several involved expressions become simpler than those appearing in [9], where the Bell polynomials were employed.
2 Proof of Theorem 1
Observe that the rational function below can be decomposed into partial fractions
where \(P^{m}_{n}(x)\) is a polynomial of degree \(m-n-1\) in x which reduces to zero when \(m\le n\), and the coefficients \(A_{k}\) are determined by the limits
Therefore, we have found the equality
By scaling down m and then making use of
we can rewrite the last equality as
Evaluating the last sum by means of the Chu–Vandemonde formula and then comparing the resultant expression with (4), we get the following recurrence relation:
In order to find an explicit expression for \(P^{m}_{n}(x)\), let \(Q_{m}:=P^{m+n}_{n}(x)\). Then the equality corresponding to (5) becomes
It is routine to figure out the initial values \(Q_{0}=0\) and \(Q_{1}=\frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n+1}\). Then we can manipulate the generating function
By differentiating the last equation with respect to y,
and then evaluating the binomial series on the right, we find, after some simplification, that \(Q(y)\) satisfies the following differential equation:
It is trivial to check that the corresponding homogeneous equation
has the binomial solution
where Ω is an arbitrary constant. When \(\Omega :=\Omega (y)\) is considered as a function of y, substituting the above solution into (7) gives rise to
Therefore, we have the integral representation
Define for simplicity
According to integration by parts, we can calculate \(J_{n}\) as follows:
By means of the induction principle, we can show that
which is equivalent to the expression
Substituting this into (8), we obtain the explicit generating function
Extracting the coefficient of \(y^{m+n}\) across the last equation yields
By reformulating the last sum with respect to k as
we find finally the binomial expression
This gives consequently the desired formula stated in Theorem 1:
3 Proofs of Theorems 2 and 3
For the derivative operator \(\mathcal{D}\) with respect to x, we have the following analytical formulae of higher order derivatives:
The first one in (9) can be evaluated easily by induction on n. In order to prove the second one in (10), define
where the function \(G_{n}\) remains to be determined with the initial values
Then by making use of the Leibniz rule, we have
which leads us to the binomial recursion
In order to find an explicit expression for \(G_{\lambda }\), we examine the exponential generating function defined by
According to (12), its derivative with respect to y can be expressed as
We therefore get the differential equation
whose solution is given by the exponential function
Evaluating the last sum with respect to k explicitly as
we find the simplified generating function
By extracting the coefficient of \(y^{n}\), we confirm the formula (10) as follows:
3.1 Proof of Theorem 2
This can be done by differentiating \(\lambda -1\) times the equality displayed in Theorem 1. Firstly, it is trivial to have
Then by making use of the Leibniz rule, we can compute
where we have invoked two derivative formulae (9) and (10). Finally,
Substituting the above three expressions into the equality of Theorem 1 and then making some simplifications, we find the algebraic identity in Theorem 2.
3.2 Proof of Theorem 3
Recalling (3), we can deduce, for the signless Stirling numbers, the symmetric function expression (see [4, Chap. V] and [5, §6.1])
This gives rise to the following identity:
Let ρ be a natural number. When \(x\to j\) with \(1\le j\le \rho \), the limiting case of the equation displayed in Theorem 2 reads as
When \(j>m\), the limit in the middle line is given directly by letting \(x=j\)
since the two factors on the right are well defined. Instead, for \(1\le j\le m\), that limit can be determined as
where the last line is justified by (14). Finally summing equation (15) over j from 1 to ρ, we obtain the following equality involving harmonic numbers:
which is equivalent to the formula stated in Theorem 3.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Boyadzhiev, K.N.: Series with central binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers, and harmonic numbers. J. Integer Seq. 15, Art#12.1.7 (2012)
Chu, W.: Harmonic number identities and Hermite–Padé approximations to the logarithm function. J. Approx. Theory 137, 42–56 (2005)
Chu, W.: Partial fraction decompositions and harmonic number identities. J. Comb. Math. Comb. Comput. 60, 139–153 (2007)
Comtet, L.: Advanced Combinatorics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)
Graham, R.L., Knuth, D.E., Patashnik, O.: Concrete Mathematics. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)
Knuth, D.E.: Two notes on notation. Am. Math. Mon. 99, 403–422 (1992)
Sofo, A., Srivastava, H.M.: A family of shifted harmonic sums. Ramanujan J. 37, 89–108 (2015)
Wang, X.Y., Chu, W.: Binomial series identities involving generalized harmonic numbers. Integers 20, A98 (2020)
Xi, G.W., Luo, Q.M.: Some extensions for the several combinatorial identities. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 38 (2021) 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03171-1
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to two anonymous referees for valuable comments and suggestions.
Funding
The first author is partially supported, during this work, by the National Science foundation of China (Youth Grant No. 11601543).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to the writing of this paper, who read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, N.N., Chu, W. Two problems of binomial sums involving harmonic numbers. Adv Differ Equ 2021, 224 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03383-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03383-z