- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of fourth-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2021, Article number: 369 (2021)
Abstract
In this paper, a class of fourth-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales is investigated. We obtain some sufficient conditions for the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero with some characteristics of the equations by Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem. Finally, two interesting examples are presented to show the significance of the results.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we consider the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of a fourth-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equation
on a time scale \(\mathbb{T}\) with \(\sup \mathbb{T}=\infty \), where
and \(t\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) with \(t_{0}\in \mathbb{T}\). Moreover, throughout this paper we satisfy the conditions as follows:
(C1) \(r_{i}\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},(0,\infty ))\), \(i=1,2,3\);
(C2) \(p\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}, [0,\infty ))\) and \(\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty }p(t)=p_{0}\in [0,1)\);
(C3) \(g,h\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}, \mathbb{T})\) and \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }g(t)=\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty }h(t)= \infty \);
(C4) \(f\in {\mathrm{C}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\times \mathbb{R}, \mathbb{R})\) and \(xf(t,x)>0\) for \(x\neq 0\);
(C5) \(\eta _{i}=\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty }H_{i}(g(t))/H_{i}(t)\in (0,1]\), where
and
if \(H_{i}(t_{0})<\infty \), \(i=1,2,3\), respectively.
In recent years, the research on nonoscillation of dynamic equations on time scales has made some progress. The scientists have provided some sufficient conditions which guarantee that the equations have nonoscillatory solutions with certain characteristics. We refer the reader to [1–6] for details of the theory of time scale, and [7–22] with the references cited therein for the achievements on the existence of nonoscillatory solutions of nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales.
A solution x of (1) is called eventually positive (or eventually negative) if there exists \(T\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) satisfying \(x(t)>0\) (or \(x(t)<0\)) for \(t\in [T,\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). The existence and asymptotic behavior of nonoscillatory solutions of a class of nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales similar to (1) have been studied successively. Without loss of generality, only the eventually positive solutions are considered. For the first-order case, Zhu and Wang [22] investigated
Gao and Wang [8], Deng and Wang [7] considered the second-order case
under different assumptions \(\int _{t_{0}}^{\infty }1/r(t)\Delta t<\infty \) and \(\int _{t_{0}}^{\infty }1/r(t)\Delta t=\infty \), respectively. Then, the third-order case
was studied in [15, 19, 21], and the higher-order case was considered in [17, 18, 20]. To have a deeper understanding of the asymptotic behavior of nonoscillatory solutions of these equations, Qiu [16] studied (1) with some conditions. In their works, different groups of eventually positive solutions of the equations are summarized. For each case, an appropriate Banach space is introduced and Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem is employed to present some sufficient conditions (or necessary and sufficient conditions) for the existence of these solutions.
We note that the case tending to zero is an important type for nonoscillatory solutions of the equations. However, the asymptotic behavior of this type is more complicated than those of other cases. It is obvious that the results of the existence for nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero are not satisfactory in [7, 8, 15, 20, 22]. Some special sufficient conditions are provided but not enough to be applied universally. Therefore, new methods should be found to study nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of the equations. Mojsej and Tartal’ová [23] were concerned with a third-order nonlinear differential equation
where f satisfies the Lipschitz condition. The authors obtained some nice sufficient conditions to ensure that (3) has a solution x with \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }x(t)=0\) meeting some characteristics. Inspired by [23], Qiu [24] investigated the nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of (2) when \(g(t)\geq t\) for \(t\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), by employing a Banach space
where \({\mathrm{C}}([T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},\mathbb{R})\) is the set of all continuous functions that map \([T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) into \(\mathbb{R}\) and \(\|x\|=\sup_{t\in [T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}} \vert x(t) \vert \). According to Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem, some new results are presented. However, considering the cases such as \(g(t)=t-2\), \(g(t)=t/3\), and \(g(t)=t+\cos t\) for \(t\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), the conclusions in [24] are not applicable when \(g(t)\geq t\) is not fulfilled eventually, especially for [7, 8, 15–22]. Afterwards, Qiu et al. [25] studied (2) under \(g(t)\leq t\) for \(t\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) and partially solved the problem. In this paper, we continue to relax the constraint and unite the cases of the function g. Provided that \(H_{i}\) have been defined for \(i=1,2,3\), note that they are all strictly decreasing on \([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). For the case that \(g(t)\geq t\) is not satisfied eventually, the condition \(\eta _{i}=1\) should be satisfied for \(i=1,2,3\), respectively.
In the following, Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem (see [26]) is presented in Lemma 1.1, which will be used in the next section. Then, we show the relation between \(R_{0}\) and x in Lemma 1.2 (see [24, Lemma 2.5]).
Lemma 1.1
Suppose that U is a contraction mapping, V is completely continuous, and \(Ux+Vy\in \Omega \) holds for all \(x,y\in \Omega \), where \(U,V:\Omega \rightarrow X\) are two operators, X is a Banach space, and Ω is a bounded, convex, and closed subset of X, then \(U+V\) has a fixed point in Ω.
Lemma 1.2
Suppose that x is an eventually positive solution of (1). If there exists a constant \(a\geq 0\) satisfying \(\lim_{t\rightarrow \infty }R_{0}(t,x(t))=a\), then we have
2 Main results
In this section, we present some sufficient conditions for the existence of eventually positive solutions of (1) under different assumptions. Firstly, suppose that the function \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, then we have Theorems 2.1–2.4.
Theorem 2.1
Assume that the function \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, \(H_{1}(t_{0})<\infty \), and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Proof
Take \(p_{1}\) satisfying \(p_{0}< p_{1}<(1+4p_{0})/5<1\), then there exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that
and
Choose \(T_{1}\in (T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that \(g(t)\geq T_{0}\) and \(h(t)\geq T_{0}\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). Define a Banach space \({\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) as (4), \(\Omega _{1}=\{x\in {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}: H_{1}(t) \leq x(t)\leq 2H_{1}(t)\}\), and two operators \(U_{1}, V_{1}: \Omega _{1}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
The proof that \(U_{1}\) and \(V_{1}\) satisfy the conditions in Lemma 1.1 is similar to those of [7, Theorem 2.5], [8, Theorem 2], [15, Theorem 3.1], and [22, Theorem 8], so it is omitted here. Therefore, there exists \(x_{1}\in \Omega _{1}\) such that \((U_{1}+V_{1})x_{1}=x_{1}\), and then, for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
Since
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) and
in view of (5), by Lemma 1.2, we derive
Moreover, for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), it follows that
and
On the other hand, we define another operator \(\overline{V}_{1}: \Omega _{1}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Similarly, there exists \(x_{2}\in \Omega _{1}\) such that \((U_{1}+\overline{V}_{1})x_{2}=x_{2}\), and then, for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
It follows that
For \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
The proof is complete. □
Theorem 2.2
Assume that the function \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, \(H_{1}(t_{0})<\infty \), and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))>0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Proof
Take \(p_{1}\) satisfying \(p_{0}< p_{1}<(1+4p_{0})/5<1\), then there exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (6) holds and
Define the same \(T_{1}\), \({\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), \(\Omega _{1}\), and \(U_{1}\) as in Theorem 2.1, and an operator \(V'_{1}: \Omega _{1}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Then there exists \(x_{1}\in \Omega _{1}\) such that \((U_{1}+V'_{1})x_{1}=x_{1}\). For \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
which means that (8) and
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Define another operator \(\overline{V}'_{1}: \Omega _{1}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Then there exists \(x_{2}\in \Omega _{1}\) such that \((U_{1}+\overline{V}'_{1})x_{2}=x_{2}\), and then, for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
It follows that (9) holds and
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). This completes the proof. □
Theorem 2.3
Assume that the function \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, \(H_{2}(t_{0})<\infty \), and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Proof
Take \(p_{1}\) as in Theorem 2.1. Then there exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that
and
Choose the same \(T_{1}\), \({\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) as in Theorem 2.1, \(\Omega _{2}=\{x\in {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}: H_{2}(t) \leq x(t)\leq 2H_{2}(t)\}\), and two operators \(U_{2}, V_{2}: \Omega _{2}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Similarly, \(U_{2}\) and \(V_{2}\) satisfy the conditions in Lemma 1.1. Then there exists \(x_{1}\in \Omega _{2}\) such that \((U_{2}+V_{2})x_{1}=x_{1}\). For \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), it follows that
Since
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) and
by virtue of (11), by Lemma 1.2, we obtain (8) and
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
On the other hand, define \(\overline{V}_{2}: \Omega _{2}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Similarly, there exists \(x_{2}\in \Omega _{2}\) such that \((U_{2}+\overline{V}_{2})x_{2}=x_{2}\), and then, for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
which implies that (9) holds. For \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we derive
The proof is complete. □
Theorem 2.4
Assume that the function \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, \(H_{3}(t_{0})<\infty \), and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has an eventually positive solution x tending to zero, which satisfies that \(R_{0}(t,x(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Proof
Take \(p_{1}\) as in Theorem 2.1. Then there exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that
and
Choose the same \(T_{1}\), \({\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) as in Theorem 2.1, \(\Omega _{3}=\{x\in {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}: H_{3}(t) \leq x(t)\leq 2H_{3}(t)\}\), and two operators \(U_{3}, V_{3}: \Omega _{3}\rightarrow {\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{ \mathbb{T}}\) as follows:
Similarly, \(U_{3}\) and \(V_{3}\) satisfy the conditions in Lemma 1.1. Then there exists \(x\in \Omega _{3}\) such that \((U_{3}+V_{3})x=x\). For \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we obtain
Since
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) and
by virtue of (12), similarly, we can conclude (8) and
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). This completes the proof. □
Secondly, we obtain Theorems 2.5–2.8 based on the assumption that the function \(f(t,x)\) satisfies the Lipschitz condition on an interval.
Theorem 2.5
Assume that \(H_{1}(t_{0})<\infty \). If there exist a constant \(L>0\) and two functions \(q\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},(0,\infty ))\) and \(f_{0}\in {\mathrm{C}}([0,2H_{1}(t_{0})], \mathbb{R})\) such that
and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Proof
Take \(p_{1}\) satisfying \(p_{0}< p_{1}<(1+4p_{0})/5<1\). There also exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (6) holds and
where \(K=\max \{|f_{0}(x)|: x\in [0,2H_{1}(t_{0})]\}>0\). Then define the same \(T_{1}\), \({\mathrm{BC}}[T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), \(\Omega _{1}\), \(U_{1}\), and \(V_{1}\) as in Theorem 2.1. Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 2.1, there exists \(x_{1}\in \Omega _{1}\) such that \((U_{1}+V_{1})x_{1}=x_{1}\), and we arrive at (7). Since
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) and
in view of (15), by Lemma 1.2, we obtain (8) and
for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). Similarly, we deduce the remaining conclusions as in Theorem 2.1. This completes the proof. □
In views of Theorems 2.2–2.5, we can also obtain Theorems 2.6–2.8 respectively when \(f(t,x)\) satisfies the Lipschitz condition on an interval. The proofs are similar to those of Theorems 2.2–2.4 and thus are omitted.
Theorem 2.6
Assume that \(H_{1}(t_{0})<\infty \). If there exist a constant \(L>0\) and two functions \(q\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},(0,\infty ))\) and \(f_{0}\in {\mathrm{C}}([0,2H_{1}(t_{0})], \mathbb{R})\) satisfying (13), (14), and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))>0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Theorem 2.7
Assume that \(H_{2}(t_{0})<\infty \). If there exist a constant \(L>0\) and two functions \(q\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},(0,\infty ))\) and \(f_{0}\in {\mathrm{C}}([0,2H_{2}(t_{0})], \mathbb{R})\) satisfying (13),
and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero, which satisfy that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
Theorem 2.8
Assume that \(H_{3}(t_{0})<\infty \). If there exist a constant \(L>0\) and two functions \(q\in {\mathrm{C_{rd}}}([t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}},(0,\infty ))\) and \(f_{0}\in {\mathrm{C}}([0,2H_{3}(t_{0})], \mathbb{R})\) satisfying (13),
and
then there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that (1) has an eventually positive solution x tending to zero, which satisfies that \(R_{0}(t,x(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x(t))<0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
In addition, we also have the following conclusion.
Theorem 2.9
Assume that one of the following conditions
and
holds, then (1) has no eventually positive solution x, for which \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), and \(R_{3}\) are all eventually negative.
Proof
Suppose that x is an eventually positive solution of (1) and there exists \(T_{0}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that, for \(t\in [T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we have
There also exists \(T_{1}\in (T_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that \(g(t)\geq T_{0}\) and \(h(t)\geq T_{0}\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). Substituting \(u_{0}\) for t in (1) and integrating (1) with respect to \(u_{0}\) from \(T_{1}\) to \(u_{1}\), where \(u_{1}\in [\sigma (T_{1}),\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we have
which implies that
Integrating (19) with respect to \(u_{1}\) from \(T_{1}\) to \(u_{2}\), where \(u_{2}\in [\sigma (T_{1}),\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), we have
By analogy, we obtain
If one of (16)–(18) holds, then we derive \(R_{0}(t,x(t))\rightarrow -\infty \) as \(t \rightarrow \infty \). However, we have \(R_{0}(t,x(t))=x(t)+p(t)x(g(t))>0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\). It causes a contradiction. This completes the proof. □
3 Examples
In this section, two interesting examples are provided to illustrate the conclusions.
Example 3.1
Let \(\mathbb{T}=\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty }[2n-1, 2n]\). For \(t\in [3,\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\), consider
where p satisfies (C2). Here, we have \(r_{1}(t)=t^{\alpha }\), \(r_{2}(t)=t^{\beta }\), \(r_{3}(t)=t^{2}\), \(g(t)=t-\cos (\pi t)/\pi \), \(h(t)=t-2\), \(f(t,x)=t\cdot x\), and \(t_{0}=3\). Moreover, we obtain
and \(\eta _{1}=\lim_{t \rightarrow \infty }H_{1}(g(t))/H_{1}(t)=1\). Hence, it fulfills conditions (C1)–(C5). Since \(f(t,x)\) is nondecreasing with respect to x, when \(\alpha >3\) and \(\beta >1\), or \(\alpha \leq 3\) and \(\beta >4-\alpha \), we have
which means that (20) has two eventually positive solutions \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) tending to zero in terms of Theorem 2.1. Moreover, there exists \(T_{1}\in [t_{0},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\) such that \(R_{0}(t,x_{i}(t))>0\), \(R_{1}(t,x_{i}(t))<0\), \(i=1,2\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{3}(t,x_{1}(t))<0\), \(R_{2}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\), and \(R_{3}(t,x_{2}(t))>0\) for \(t\in [T_{1},\infty )_{\mathbb{T}}\).
When \(\alpha >3\) and \(\beta >4-\alpha \), it follows that
Hence, we deduce that (20) has two eventually positive solutions satisfying the conclusions of Theorem 2.2.
When \(\alpha >3\) and \(\beta >1\), we obtain \(H_{2}(3)<\infty \). Then there exists a constant \(M>0\) such that
from which it follows that
Note that \(\eta _{2}=1\). Therefore, (20) has two eventually positive solutions fulfilling the results of Theorem 2.3.
When \(\alpha >1\) and \(\beta >3-\alpha \), we obtain \(H_{3}(3)<\infty \),
and
where the conclusions of Theorem 2.4 are satisfied.
On the other hand, consider conditions (16)–(18). Obviously, (16) does not hold here. Then (17) is satisfied when \(\alpha \in \mathbb{R}\) and \(\beta \leq 1\), and (18) holds when \(\alpha \leq 1\) and \(\beta \in \mathbb{R}\), or \(\alpha >1\) and \(\beta \leq 2-\alpha \). By virtue of Theorem 2.9, if these conditions of α and β are satisfied, then we can conclude that (20) has no eventually positive solution x, for which \(R_{1}\), \(R_{2}\), and \(R_{3}\) are all eventually negative.
Example 3.2
Let \(\mathbb{T}=[1,\infty )_{\mathbb{R}}\). For \(t\in \mathbb{T}\), consider
where p satisfies (C2). Here, we have \(r_{1}(t)=t^{\alpha }\), \(r_{2}(t)=t^{\beta }\), \(r_{3}(t)=t^{3}\), \(g(t)=t+1\), \(h(t)=t\), \(f(t,x)=x^{3}/t\), and \(t_{0}=1\). Then, we take \(q(t)=1/t\) and \(f_{0}(x)=x^{3}\).
Firstly, for \(\alpha \geq 1\) and \(\beta >1\), we have
and
from which we get the conclusion of Theorem 2.5. On the other hand, for \(\alpha >1\) and \(\beta \geq 1\), we derive
Hence, the result of Theorem 2.6 is obtained.
Secondly, for \(\alpha >1\) and \(\beta >1\), there exists a constant \(M>0\) such that
Moreover, it follows that
and
Then we obtain the conclusion of Theorem 2.7.
Finally, we find that
so the result of Theorem 2.8 seems not to be deduced. However, for \(\alpha >1\) and \(\beta >1\), in view of Theorem 2.4, we have \(H_{3}(1)<\infty \),
and
Therefore, we still derive the result of Theorem 2.4 (or Theorem 2.8).
4 Conclusion
In this paper, we successfully obtain some new results for the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of a class of fourth-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Moreover, compared with the existing references, the assumptions of functions f and g are more relaxed. According to this technique, we can continue to study the existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of similar forms of higher-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Hilger, S.: Ein Maßkettenkalkül mit Anwendung auf Zentrumsmannigfaltigkeiten. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Würzburg (1988)
Hilger, S.: Analysis on measure chains – a unified approach to continuous and discrete calculus. Results Math. 18, 18–56 (1990)
Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M.: Basic calculus on time scales and some of its applications. Results Math. 35, 3–22 (1999)
Agarwal, R.P., Bohner, M., O’Regan, D., Peterson, A.: Dynamic equations on time scales: a survey. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 141, 1–26 (2002)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: An Introduction with Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston (2001)
Bohner, M., Peterson, A.: Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser, Boston (2003)
Deng, X.-H., Wang, Q.-R.: Nonoscillatory solutions to second-order neutral functional dynamic equations on time scales. Commun. Appl. Anal. 18, 261–280 (2014)
Gao, J., Wang, Q.R.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to second-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 43, 1521–1535 (2013)
Karpuz, B.: Asymptotic behaviour of bounded solutions of a class of higher-order neutral dynamic equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 215, 2174–2183 (2009)
Karpuz, B.: Necessary and sufficient conditions on the asymptotic behaviour of second-order neutral delay dynamic equations with positive and negative coefficients. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 37, 1219–1231 (2014)
Karpuz, B., Öcalan, Ö.: Necessary and sufficient conditions on asymptotic behaviour of solutions of forced neutral delay dynamic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 3063–3071 (2009)
Karpuz, B., Öcalan, Ö., Rath, R.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for the oscillatory and asymptotic behaviour of solutions to neutral delay dynamic equations. Electron. J. Differ. Equ. 2009, 64 (2009)
Li, T.X., Han, Z.L., Sun, S.R., Yang, D.W.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to second-order neutral delay dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2009, 562329 (2009)
Li, T.X., Zhang, C.H., Thandapani, E.: Asymptotic behavior of fourth-order neutral dynamic equations with noncanonical operators. Taiwan. J. Math. 18, 1003–1019 (2014)
Qiu, Y.-C.: Nonoscillatory solutions to third-order neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2014, 309 (2014)
Qiu, Y.-C.: Nonoscillatory solutions to fourth-order neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2019, 512 (2019)
Qiu, Y.-C., Chiu, K.-S., Jadlovská, I., Li, T.X.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to nonlinear higher-order neutral dynamic equations. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 475 (2020)
Qiu, Y.-C., Jadlovská, I., Lassoued, D., Li, T.X.: Nonoscillatory solutions to higher-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations. Symmetry 11, 302 (2019)
Qiu, Y.-C., Wang, H.X., Jiang, C.M., Li, T.X.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to third-order neutral functional dynamic equations on time scales. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 11, 274–287 (2018)
Qiu, Y.-C., Wang, Q.-R.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to higher-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 41, 1935–1952 (2018)
Qiu, Y.-C., Zada, A., Tang, S.H., Li, T.X.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to nonlinear third-order neutral dynamic equations on time scales. J. Nonlinear Sci. Appl. 10, 4352–4363 (2017)
Zhu, Z.-Q., Wang, Q.-R.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions to neutral dynamic equations on time scales. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 335, 751–762 (2007)
Mojsej, I., Tartal’ová, A.: On nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of third-order nonlinear differential equations. Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 48, 135–143 (2011)
Qiu, Y.-C.: On nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of third-order nonlinear dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2016, 10 (2016)
Qiu, Y.-C., Jadlovská, I., Chiu, K.-S., Li, T.X.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of third-order neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2020, 231 (2020)
Chen, Y.S.: Existence of nonoscillatory solutions of nth order neutral delay differential equations. Funcialaj Ekvacioj 35, 557–570 (1992)
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions.
Funding
This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11671406 and 12071491) and the Innovation Enhancing College Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2020KTSCX367).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, YC. Existence of nonoscillatory solutions tending to zero of fourth-order nonlinear neutral dynamic equations on time scales. Adv Differ Equ 2021, 369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03529-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-021-03529-z