- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function and its application
Advances in Continuous and Discrete Models volume 2023, Article number: 1 (2023)
Abstract
In this paper, by using the residue method of complex analysis, we obtain an explicit partial fraction decomposition for the general rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) (M is any nonnegative integer, λ and n are any positive integers). As applications, we deduce the corresponding algebraic identities and combinatorial identities which are the corresponding extensions of Chu’ results. We also give some explicit formulas of Apostol-type polynomials and harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind.
1 Introduction and the main results
The generalized harmonic numbers are defined by
when \(r=1\), they reduce to the classical harmonic numbers as \(H_{n}=H_{n}^{(1)}\).
For \(z \in \mathbb{C}\), the shifted factorial is defined by
The complete Bell polynomials \(\mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots , x_{n})\) are defined by [16, pp. 173–174]
which exact expression is
where \(\pi (n)\) denotes a partition of n, usually denoted \(1^{k_{1}}2^{k_{2}} \cdots n^{k_{n}}\), with \(k_{1}+2k_{2}+\cdots +{nk_{n}=n}\).
From (2) we easily obtain
For convenience, we define the above sum as equal to zero for \(n<0\), i.e., \(\mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2},\dots , x_{n})=0\) when \(n<0\).
The partial fraction decomposition plays an important role in the study of the combinatorial identities and related questions (for example, see [14, 15, 17–19, 22–24] and the references therein). Chu [5] established the partial fraction decompositions of two rational functions \(\frac{1}{(x)^{\lambda}_{n+1}}\) and \(\frac{x^{M-1}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\), thereby completely resolving the open problem of Driver et al. [7].
When \(\frac{x^{M-1}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) is a proper rational fraction, i.e., \(M-1<\lambda{n}\), we can use the method of the partial fraction decomposition. But when \(\frac{x^{M-1}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) is an improper rational fraction, i.e., \(M-1 \geq \lambda{n}\), how do we decompose \(\frac{x^{M-1}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) into partial fractions?
In the present paper, by using the contour integral and Cauchy’s residue theorem, we will answer the above question and give an explicit decomposition for the general rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\). As applications, we deduce the corresponding algebraic and combinatorial identities which are just some extensions of Chu’s results. We give some explicit formulas of Apostol-type polynomials and harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind.
Theorem 1
Suppose M is any nonnegative integer, λ and n are any positive integers such that \(N=\lambda{n}\), and x is a complex number such that \(x \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots ,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:
where
• When \(M-N \geq 0\) in Theorem 1, i.e., the degree of the numerator polynomial, M, is not smaller than the degree of the denominator polynomial, \(N=\lambda{n}\), we say that Theorem 1 is a more general and new decomposition of the rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\). For example, below we give the first four special cases.
When \(M-N=0\), we have
where
When \(M-N=1\), we have
where \(y_{i}=(i-1)! [\lambda (H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} )-\frac{\lambda (n+1)+1}{k^{i}} ]\), \(i=1,2,\ldots , \lambda -1\).
When \(M-N=2\),
where \(y_{i}=(i-1)! [\lambda (H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} )-\frac{\lambda (n+1)+2}{k^{i}} ]\), \(i=1,2,\ldots , \lambda -1\).
When \(M-N=3\),
where \(y_{i}=(i-1)! [\lambda (H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} )-\frac{\lambda (n+1)+3}{k^{i}} ]\), \(i=1,2,\ldots , \lambda -1\).
Remark 2
When \(M-N \geq 0\) in Theorem 1, if put \(a_{j}= \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{j})}{j!}\) and
then Theorem 1 becomes the following explicit form:
which is an explicit result when the polynomial \(x^{M}\) is divided by polynomial \((x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}\), i.e., the improper rational fraction \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) is decomposed into a polynomial of order \(M-N\) plus a proper rational fraction. Therefore we say that Theorem 1 implies a new and interesting method for division of two polynomials.
• When \(M-N<0\), i.e., the degree of the numerator polynomial, M, is smaller than the degree of the denominator polynomial, \(N=\lambda{n}\), we obtain the following Chu’s result:
Corollary 3
([5, Theorem 5])
Suppose M is any nonnegative integer, λ and n are any positive integers such that \(M< N=\lambda{n}\), and x is a complex number such that \(x \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots ,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:
where
Remark 4
If put \(M=0\) and then let \(x \longmapsto x-1\) and \(n \longmapsto n+1\) in Theorem 1, noting that the empty sum is zero, we observe that Theorem 1 reduces to Theorem 2 of Chu [5, p. 44, (1.5)]:
where \(y_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} )\) for \(i=1,2,\ldots ,\lambda -1\).
Remark 5
It is easily seen that Theorem 1 includes Chu’s results, but when \(M-N \geqslant 0\) Theorem 1 is a new result. Therefore, we say that Theorem 1 is an interesting extension of Chu’s results. We also see that Theorem 1 is not obtained using the partial fraction decomposition.
Setting \(\lambda =1\) and letting \(M \mapsto m\) in Theorem 1, we deduce the following result:
Corollary 6
Suppose m is any nonnegative integer, n is any positive integer, and x is a complex number such that \(x \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots ,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:
where
Furthermore, taking \(m=0\) in Corollary 6, we obtain the following algebraic identity:
or, equivalently, the following well-known combinatorial identity (e.g., see [13]):
Next we obtain the following combinatorial identities from Theorem 1:
-
Setting \(x=0\), we have
$$ \sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k+1)}+M} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}\sum^{ \lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{k^{j+M}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots ,y_{j})}{j!} = \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 1 \leqslant M < N, \\ (n!)^{\lambda}, & M=0, \\ -\frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{M-N})}{(n!)^{\lambda}(M-N)!}, & M \geqslant N. \end{cases} $$ -
Setting \(x=0\) and letting \(M \longmapsto M+1\), we get
$$ \begin{aligned} &\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{k}} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}(-k)^{M+\lambda} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots ,y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!} \\ &\quad= \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N+1}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{M-N+1})}{(n!)^{\lambda}(M-N+1)!} \\ &\quad\quad {}+\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k+1)}+M+1} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -2}_{j=0} \frac{k^{j+M+1}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots ,y_{j})}{j!}, \quad M+1 \geqslant N. \end{aligned} $$where
$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (-1)^{i}(i-1)! \sum ^{n}_{j=1}j^{i}, \quad i=1,2, \ldots ,M-N+1, \\ & y_{i}=(i-1)! \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M+1}{k^{i}} \biggr], \quad i=1,2,\ldots , \lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
We can also get the following special cases of Theorem 1:
-
Taking \(x=1\) gives
$$ \sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{k}} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}(-k)^{ \lambda +M}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots ,y_{j})}{j!(k+1)^{\lambda -j}}= \frac{1}{(n+1)^{\lambda}}-(n!)^{\lambda} \sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{j})}{j!}. $$ -
Taking \(x=i\) (here \(i=\sqrt{-1}\)) yields
$$ \sum^{n}_{k=1}\frac{(-1)^{\lambda{k}}}{(n!)^{\lambda}} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}(-k)^{\lambda +M}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots ,y_{j})}{j!(i+k)^{\lambda -j}}= \frac{i^{M}}{(i+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}- \sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{j})}{j!}i^{M-N-j}. $$
2 Proof of Theorem 1
Lemma 7
Suppose M is any nonnegative integer, λ and n are any positive integers such that \(N=\lambda{n}\), and x is a complex number such that \(x \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots ,-n\}\). Then the following algebraic identity holds:
where
Proof
We first construct two polynomials \(P(z)\) and \(Q(z)\) of degrees M and \(N+1\), respectively, which are given by
such that \(x \neq 0,-1,-2,\ldots ,-n\).
We next construct three contour integrals for the rational functions \(P(z)/Q(z)\):
\(\oint _{ \Gamma} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where Γ is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the single pole x of \(P(z)/Q(z)\);
\(\oint _{ {\Gamma} _{1}} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where \({\Gamma}_{1}\) is a simple closed contour which surrounds the poles \(-1,-2, \dots , -n\) of \(P(z)/Q(z)\);
\(\oint _{ {\Gamma} _{2}} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where \({\Gamma}_{2}\) is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the pole ∞ of \(P(z)/Q(z)\).
In the extended complex plane, since the total sum of residues of a rational function at all finite poles and that at infinity is equal to zero [12, p. 25, Theorem 2], we have
or equivalently,
Below we compute the contour integrals \(\oint _{\Gamma}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), \(\oint _{{\Gamma}_{1}} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), and \(\oint _{{\Gamma}_{2}}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), respectively.
Applying Cauchy’s residue theorem, we compute the contour integral \(\oint _{ {\Gamma}}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\) as follows:
We now compute the contour integral \(\oint _{{ {\Gamma}_{1}}}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\). By utilizing Cauchy’s residue theorem, noting that the power series expansion of the logarithmic function is
and using the definition of complete Bell polynomials, we obtain
Calculating the contour integral \(\oint _{{\Gamma}_{2}} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), we obtain
If \(M-N < 0\), then \(t=0\) is not a pole, and so we have
If \(M-N =0\), then \(t=0\) is a single pole of order 1, so we have
If \(M-N > 0\), then \(t=0\) is a single pole of order \(M-N+1\), and so we have
Therefore, by replacing (9), (10), and (11) into (8), we obtain Lemma 7. This proof is complete. □
Lemma 8
The following recursion formula of complete Bell polynomial holds true:
Proof
Let
Write \(w_{i}=y_{i}+\frac{(i-1)!}{(x+k)^{i}}\) in (7). By the definition of complete Bell polynomial, we obtain
In the above process, we apply the geometric series,
and the expansion of the logarithmic function,
This proof is complete. □
Lemma 9
The following recursion formula of complete Bell polynomial holds true:
Proof
Let
Write \(z_{i}=x_{i}+(i-1)!x^{i}\) in (6). By the definition of complete Bell polynomial, we obtain
This proof is complete. □
From Lemmas 7, 8, and 9, we obtain Theorem 1 immediately. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.
3 Applications to Apostol-type polynomials
In the present section, using the contour integrals and the main result (Theorem 1), we first obtain two lemmas, and then we give some explicit formulas for Apostol-type polynomials.
Lemma 10
Let m be a nonnegative integer and n a positive integer, also let \(\mathbf{B}_{m}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots , x_{m})\) be the complete Bell polynomial. Then
Proof
First we construct two polynomials \(z^{n+m}\) and \((z-1)^{n}\) of degrees \(n+m\) and n, respectively.
Next, we construct the following contour integrals for the rational functions \(\frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\):
\(\oint _{ \Gamma} \frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where Γ is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the single pole \(z=1\) of order n of \(\frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\);
\(\oint _{ {\Gamma}'} \frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where \({\Gamma}'\) is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the pole \(z=\infty \) of \(\frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\).
By utilizing Cauchy’s residue theorem, we obtain
In the extended complex plane, we calculate the residue of the rational function \(\frac{z^{n+m}}{(z-1)^{n}}\) at \(z=\infty \).
By utilizing the power series expansion of the logarithmic function,
and combining the definition of complete Bell polynomial, we obtain
Comparing (17) and (18) and letting \(m \mapsto m-1\), we obtain the desired formula (14).
Similarly, we can obtain formula (15). By the definition of complete Bell polynomial, we have
Applying (3) to (14), we obtain (16) directly. This completes the proof. □
Lemma 11
The following algebraic identity holds true:
Proof
Putting \(n=1\) and letting \(M \mapsto m\) and \(\lambda \mapsto n\) in Theorem 1, noting (3), we get that \(x_{i}\) and \(y_{i}\) become
respectively. Making use of (14) and (15) from Lemma 10, we obtain (19) immediately. □
• The Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials \(\mathcal{B} _{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( x;\lambda ) \) of order α are defined by means of the generating function (cf. Luo and Srivastava [10]):
with, of course,
where \(\mathcal{B}_{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( \lambda ) \) denote the so-called Apostol–Bernoulli numbers of order α.
Let \(x \mapsto -\lambda \exp (x)\) in (19). We have
Multiplying both sides of (22) by \(x^{n}\) and noting (20), we have
Letting \(k \mapsto k-n\) and \(k \mapsto k-j\) in the first and second terms on the right, respectively, we obtain
Comparing the coefficients of \(\frac{x^{k}}{k!}\) on both sides of (24), we obtain the following new formula of Apostol–Bernoulli polynomials \(\mathcal{B} _{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( x;\lambda )\):
Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (25), we obtain the following formula of the generalized Bernoulli polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
Setting \(k=n\) in (26), we have
Further setting \(m=n\) in (27), we have
Taking \(n=1\) in (26), we obtain the following formula of Bernoulli polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
• The Apostol–Euler polynomials \(\mathcal{E}_{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( x;\lambda ) \) of order α are defined by means of the generating function(cf. Luo [9]):
with, of course,
where \(\mathcal{E}_{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( \lambda ) \) denote the so-called Apostol–Euler numbers of order α.
Letting \(x \mapsto \lambda \exp (x)\) in (19), we have
Multiplying both sides of (32) by \(2^{n}\) and using (30), we have
Comparing the coefficients of \(\frac{x^{k}}{k!}\) on both sides of (33), we obtain the following new formula of Apostol–Euler polynomials \(\mathcal{E} _{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( x;\lambda )\):
Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (34), we obtain the following formula of the generalized Euler polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
Taking \(k=n\) in (35), we have
Further setting \(m=n\) in (36), we have
Taking \(n=1\) in (35), we obtain the following formula of Euler polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
• The Apostol–Genocchi polynomials of higher order are defined by means of the generating function (cf. Luo and Srivastava [11]):
with, of course,
where \(\mathcal{G}_{n} ( \lambda )\), \(\mathcal{G}_{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( \lambda ) \), and \(\mathcal{G}_{n} ( x;\lambda )\) denote the so-called Apostol–Genocchi numbers, Apostol–Genocchi numbers of order α, and Apostol–Genocchi polynomials, respectively.
Letting \(x \mapsto \lambda \exp (x)\) in (19), we have
Multiplying both sides of (41) by \({2^{n}x}^{n}\) and noting (39), we have
Let \(k \mapsto k-n\) and \(k \mapsto k-j\) in the first and second terms on the right, respectively, we have
Comparing the coefficients of \(\frac{x^{k}}{k!}\) on both sides of (43), we obtain the following new formula of Apostol–Genocchi polynomials \(\mathcal{G} _{n}^{ ( \alpha ) } ( x;\lambda )\):
Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (44), we obtain the following formula of the generalized Genocchi polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
Taking \(k=n\) in (45), we have
Further setting \(m=n\) in (46), we have
Taking \(n=1\) in (45), we obtain the following formula of Genocchi polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
• The generalized Apostol-type polynomials
of (real or complex) order α are defined by means of the following generating function (cf. Luo and Srivastava [11]):
with, of course, we have
and
Letting \(x \mapsto \lambda \exp (x)\) in (19), we have
Multiplying both sides of (53) by \(2^{n\mu}x^{n\nu}\) and noting (49), we get
Letting \(k \mapsto k-n\nu \) and \(k \mapsto k-j\nu \) in the first and second terms on the right, respectively, we have
Comparing the coefficients of \(\frac{x^{k}}{k!}\) on both sides of (55), we obtain the following new formula of Apostol-type polynomials \(\mathcal{F}_{k}^{(n)}(m;\lambda ; \mu ;\nu )\):
Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (56), we obtain the following formula of Apostol-type polynomials at the nonnegative integers;
Taking \(n=1\) in (57), we obtain the following formula of the Apostol-type polynomials at the nonnegative integers:
4 Applications to the harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind
The number \(S(n,k)\) of k-partitions is called a Stirling number of the second kind. Hence \(S(n,k)>0\) for \(1\leq k \leq n\) and
We put \(S(0,0)=1\) and \(S(0,k)=0\) for \(k \geq 1\).
Theorem 12
([6, p. 204, Theorem A])
The following explicit representation formulas hold true:
and
Theorem 13
([6, p. 207, [2d], Theorem C])
The rational generating function for the Stirling numbers of the second kind is
Below we further generalize the above classical Stirling numbers of the second kind and obtain some new formulas using our main result Theorem 1.
Definition 14
The harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind are defined by means of the following generating function:
Definition 15
The harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind of higher order are defined by means of the following generating function:
Definition 16
The generalized harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind are defined by means of the following generating function:
Definition 17
The generalized harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind of higher order are defined by means of the following generating function:
For other generalized Stirling numbers of the second kind, we refer to [1–4] and the references therein.
Letting \(M \mapsto m\), \(n \mapsto k\), \(\lambda \mapsto r\), \(x \mapsto -x\) in Theorem 1 and using (3), we obtain
where
By (65) and the binomial theorem,
we have
Comparing the coefficients of \(x^{n}\) on both sides of (69), we obtain the formula of the generalized harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind of higher order \(HS^{(r)}(n,k;m)\):
where \(x_{s}\) and \(y_{s}\) are given by (67) and (68), respectively.
When \(m-rk-n<0\) in (70),
When \(m-rk-n=0\) in (70),
where \(y_{s}\) is given by (68).
Taking \(r=1\), \(m=k\) in (70), we obtain a formula of the harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind \(HS(n,k)\):
Taking \(m=k\) in (70), we obtain a formula of the harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind of higher order \(HS^{(r)}(n,k)\):
where \(y_{s}\) is given by (68).
Taking \(r=1\) in (70), we obtain a formula of the generalized harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind \(HS(n,k;m)\):
where
When \(m-k< n\) in (75),
When \(m-k=n\) in (75),
When \(m-k>n\) in (75),
Definition 18
(Knuth, [8, p. 264, (7)])
The generalized Stirling numbers of the second kind \({S}(-n,k)\) are defined by means of the following sum:
When \(m=0\) in (75),
When \(m< n\) in (75),
5 Conclusions
We change the form of (62) as follows:
Comparing the above form and the definition of the classical Stirling numbers of the second kind (61), we call the coefficients in (62) the harmonic Stirling numbers of the second kind.
As is well known, the basic (or q-) series and basic (or q-) polynomials, especially the basic (or q-) hypergeometric functions and basic (or q-) hypergeometric polynomials, are known to have widespread applications, particularly in several areas of number theory and combinatorial analysis, in particular the theory of partitions.
Recently, Srivastava [19–21] published a survey-cum-expository article on the q-calculus and the fractional q-calculus in geometric function theory of complex analysis, and gave a survey of some recent developments on higher transcendental functions of analytic number theory and applied mathematics, as well as some operators of fractional calculus, related special functions, and integral transformations. In [19, p. 340], professor Srivastava pointed out an important demonstrated observation that any \((p,q)\)-variation of the proposed q-results would be trivially inconsequential, because the additional parameter p is obviously redundant. Hence we suggest the corresponding basic (or q-) extensions of the results of this paper.
In this concluding section, we mention that for a general improper rational function, with m and n being the degrees of the numerator and denominator polynomials, \(p(z)\) and \(q(z) \), of this improper rational function, respectively, decomposing such a function into a polynomial plus a proper rational fraction is usually very difficult. However, can we decompose a general improper rational function \(p(z)/q(z)\) into partial fractions?
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Andrews, G.E., Egge, E.S., Gawronski, W., Littlejohn, L.L.: The Jacobi–Stirling numbers. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 120, 288–303 (2013)
Andrews, G.E., Gawronski, W., Littlejohn, L.L.: The Legendre–Stirling numbers. Discrete Math. 311, 1255–1272 (2011)
Benoumhani, M.: On Whitney numbers of Dowling lattices. Discrete Math. 159, 13–33 (1996)
Broder, A.Z.: The r-Stirling numbers. Discrete Math. 49, 241–259 (1984)
Chu, W.: Harmonic number identities and Hermite–Padé approximations to the logarithm function. J. Approx. Theory 137, 42–56 (2005)
Comtet, L.: Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)
Driver, K., Prodinger, H., Schneider, C., Weideman, J.A.C.: Padé approximations to the logarithm. II. Identities, recurrences, and symbolic computation. Ramanujan J. 11(2), 139–158 (2006)
Loeb, D.E.: A generalization of the Stirling numbers. Discrete Math. 103, 259–269 (1992)
Luo, Q.-M.: Apostol–Euler polynomials of higher order and Gaussian hypergeometric functions. Taiwan. J. Math. 10, 917–925 (2006)
Luo, Q.-M., Srivastava, H.M.: Some generalizations of the Apostol–Bernoulli and Apostol–Euler polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 308, 290–302 (2005)
Luo, Q.-M., Srivastava, H.M.: Some generalizations of the Apostol–Genocchi polynomials and the Stirling numbers of the second kind. Appl. Math. Comput. 217, 5702–5728 (2011)
Mitrinović, D.S., Kečkić, J.D.: The Cauchy Method of Residues. Theory and Applications. Translated from Serbian by Kečkić. Mathematics and Its Applications (East European Series), vol. 9. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984)
Peterson, J.: A probabilistic proof of a binomial identity. Am. Math. Mon. 120, 558–562 (2013)
Prodinger, H.: Mortenson’s identities and partial fraction decomposition. Util. Math. 103, 175–179 (2017)
Rassias, T.M., Srivastava, H.M.: Some classes of infinite series associated with the Riemann zeta and polygamma functions and generalized harmonic numbers. Appl. Math. Comput. 131, 593–605 (2002)
Riordan, J.: Combinatorial Identities. Wiley, New York (1968)
Sofo, A., Srivastava, H.M.: Identities for the harmonic numbers and binomial coefficients. Ramanujan J. 25, 93–113 (2011)
Sofo, A., Srivastava, H.M.: A family of shifted harmonic sums. Ramanujan J. 37, 89–108 (2015)
Srivastava, H.M.: Operators of basic (or q-) calculus and fractional q-calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A, Sci. 44, 327–344 (2020)
Srivastava, H.M.: A survey of some recent developments on higher transcendental functions of analytic number theory and applied mathematics. Symmetry 13, 1–22 (2021)
Srivastava, H.M.: Some parametric and argument variations of the operators of fractional calculus and related special functions and integral transformations. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 22, 1501–1520 (2021)
Srivastava, H.M., Raina, R.K.: Some combinatorial series identities. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 96, 9–13 (1984)
Xi, G.-W., Luo, Q.-M.: Some extensions for the several combinatorial identities. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 38 (2021)
Zhu, J.-M., Luo, Q.-M.: A novel proof of two partial fraction decompositions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 274 (2021)
Acknowledgements
The authors greatly appreciate the help of professor H.M. Srivastava and a referee for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Funding
The present investigation was supported by Natural Science Foundation General Project of Chongqing, China under Grant cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0143 and Major Project of Henan’s Universitites (Grant No. 23A110013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
There was an equal amount of contributions from the two authors; both of them read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, JM., Luo, QM. Partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function and its application. Adv Cont Discr Mod 2023, 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03734-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-022-03734-4