Skip to main content

Theory and Modern Applications

A q-analogue for partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function and its application

Abstract

In this paper, by using the residue method of complex analysis, we obtain a q-analogue for partial-fraction decomposition of the rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\). As applications, we deduce the corresponding q-algebraic and q-combinatorial identities which are the q-extensions of Chu’ results.

1 Introduction and main result

Throughout this paper, we always make use of the following notation: \(\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3, \ldots \}\) denotes the set of natural numbers, \(\mathbb{N}_{0}=\{0,1,2,3, \ldots \}\) denotes the set of nonnegative integers, \(\mathbb{C}\) denotes the set of complex numbers.

For \(a \in \mathbb{C}\), the shifted factorial are defined by

$$\begin{aligned} (a)_{0} = 1\quad \text{and} \quad(a)_{n}=a(a+1)\cdots (a+n-1)\quad \text{for } n=1,2,\ldots \end{aligned}$$

The q-shifted factorial are defined by

$$\begin{aligned} & (a;q)_{0} =1,\qquad (a;q)_{n} =(1-a) (1-aq)\cdots \bigl(1-aq^{n-1}\bigr) = \prod_{k=0}^{n-1} \bigl(1-aq^{k}\bigr) \quad(n=1,2,\ldots ), \\ & (a;q)_{\infty }= (1-a) (1-aq) \cdots \bigl(1-aq^{n}\bigr) \cdots = \prod_{k=0}^{ \infty } \bigl(1-aq^{k}\bigr) \quad\bigl( \vert q \vert < 1; a, q \in \mathbb{C}\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

The q-numbers and q-numbers factorial are defined by

$$\begin{aligned} & [a]_{q} =\frac {1-q^{a}}{1-q} \quad (q \neq 1); \qquad [0]_{q} !=1,\qquad [n]_{q} != [1]_{q} [2]_{q} \cdots [n]_{q}\quad (n \in \mathbb{N}, a \in \mathbb{C}), \end{aligned}$$

respectively. Clearly,

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{q \to 1}[a]_{q} = a,\qquad \lim_{q \to 1}[n]_{q}! = n!. \end{aligned}$$

The q-shifted factorial of q-numbers defined by

$$\begin{aligned} \bigl([a]_{q}\bigr)_{n}: = [a]_{q} [a+1]_{q} \cdots [a+n-1]_{q}\quad (n \in \mathbb{N}, a \in \mathbb{C}). \end{aligned}$$

Clearly,

$$\begin{aligned} \lim_{q \to 1}\bigl([a]_{q}\bigr)_{n} = (a)_{n}, \end{aligned}$$

i.e., q-numbers shifted factorial \(([a]_{q})_{n}\) is an q-analogue of the shifted factorial \((a)_{n}\).

The q-shifted factorial \((a;q)_{n}\) is not a q-analogue of the shifted factorial \((a)_{n}\). Let \(q \mapsto q^{a}\) and then divide \((1-q)^{n}\). Therefore \((a;q)_{n}\) becomes \(([a]_{q})_{n} = \frac {(q^{a};q)_{n}}{(1-q)^{n}}\) which is a q-analogue of the shifted factorial \((a)_{n}\).

The q-binomial coefficient is defined by

$$\begin{aligned} {n \brack k}_{q}=\frac{(q;q)_{n}}{(q;q)_{n-k}(q;q)_{k}}, \end{aligned}$$

which satisfies the following relationships:

$$\begin{aligned} & {n \brack k}_{q}={n \brack n-k}_{q} \quad(0 \leq k \leq n),\qquad {n \brack k}_{q}=0 \quad (n< k), \\ & {x \brack k}_{q}={x-1 \brack k-1}_{q}+q^{k}{x-1 \brack k}_{q}\quad (n, k \in \mathbb{N}; x \in \mathbb{C}). \end{aligned}$$

The above q-standard notation can be found in [1] and [11].

The generalized harmonic numbers are defined by

$$\begin{aligned} H_{0}^{(r)}=0 \quad\text{and}\quad H_{n}^{(r)}=\sum _{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{k^{r}} \quad\text{for } n,r=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$

when \(r=1\), they reduce to the classical harmonic numbers as \(H_{n}=H_{n}^{(1)}\).

Two q-generalized harmonic numbers are respectively defined by

$$\begin{aligned} H_{0;q}^{(r)}=0 \quad\text{and}\quad H_{n;q}^{(r)}= \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{(1-q^{k})^{r}} \quad\text{for } n,r=1,2,\ldots, \end{aligned}$$

and

$$\begin{aligned} \tilde{H}_{0;q}^{(r)}=0 \quad\text{and}\quad \tilde{H}_{n;q}^{(r)}= \sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{q^{kr}}{(1-q^{k})^{r}} \quad\text{for } n,r=1,2, \ldots, \end{aligned}$$

when \(r=1\), they reduce to the q-harmonic numbers \(H_{n;q}=H_{n;q}^{(1)}\) and \(\tilde{H}_{n;q}=\tilde{H}_{n;q}^{(1)}\), respectively.

The complete Bell polynomials \(\mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots, x_{n})\) are defined by (see [9, p. 133–137] or [16, p. 173–174])

$$\begin{aligned} \exp \Biggl(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}x_{k} \frac{z^{k}}{k!} \Biggr) =\sum_{n=0}^{ \infty} \mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots, x_{n})\frac{z^{n}}{n!},\quad \mathbf{B}_{0}:=1, \end{aligned}$$
(1)

with an exact expression being

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots,x_{n})=\sum_{\pi (n)} \frac {n!}{k_{1}!k_{2}! \cdots k_{n}!} \biggl(\frac {x_{1}}{1!} \biggr)^{k_{1}} \biggl(\frac {x_{2}}{2!} \biggr)^{k_{2}} \cdots \biggl(\frac {x_{n}}{n!} \biggr)^{k_{n}}, \end{aligned}$$
(2)

where \(\pi (n)\) denotes a partition of n, usually denoted \(1^{k_{1}}2^{k_{2}} \cdots n^{k_{n}}\), with \(k_{1}+2k_{2}+\cdots +nk_{n}=n\). The complete Bell polynomials \(\mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2}, \dots, x_{n})\) for \(n=0\) to 5 are respectively given by:

$$\begin{aligned} & \mathbf{B}_{0}=1, \\ & \mathbf{B}_{1}(x_{1})=x_{1}, \\ & \mathbf{B}_{2}(x_{1},x_{2})=x_{1}^{2}+x_{2}, \\ & \mathbf{B}_{3}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3})=x_{1}^{3}+3x_{1}x_{2}+x_{3}, \\ & \mathbf{B}_{4}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=x_{1}^{4}+6x_{1}^{2}x_{2}+4x_{1}x_{3}+3x_{2}^{2}+x_{4}, \\ & \mathbf{B}_{5}(x_{1},x_{2},x_{3},x_{4},x_{5})=x_{1}^{5}+10x_{1}^{3}x_{2}+15x_{1}x_{2}^{2}+10x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+10x_{2}x_{3}+5x_{1}x_{4}+x_{5}. \end{aligned}$$

From (2) we easily obtain

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf{{B}}}_{n}\bigl(-x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots, (-1)^{n}x_{n}\bigr)=(-1)^{n}{ \mathbf{{B}}}_{n}(x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots, x_{n}). \end{aligned}$$
(3)

For convenience, we define the above sum as equal to zero for \(n<0\), i.e., \(\mathbf{B}_{n}(x_{1},x_{2},\dots, x_{n})=0\) when \(n<0\).

Chu [3] established the partial fraction decompositions of two rational functions \(\frac{1}{(z)^{\lambda}_{n+1}}\) and \(\frac{z^{M}}{(z)^{\lambda}_{n+1}}\) based on the induction principle and famous Faà di Bruno formula and obtained several striking harmonic number identities from two partial fraction decompositions, therefore resolved completely the open problem of Driver et al. [10]. It is not difficult, by using (2), to reformulate two main results of Chu as follows:

Theorem 1

([3, Theorem 2])

Suppose that λ and n are positive integers, \(z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{0,-1,\dots,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(n!)^{\lambda}}{(z)^{\lambda}_{n+1}}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{k \lambda} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots,x_{j})}{j!(z+k)^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(4)

where

$$\begin{aligned} x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr),\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

Theorem 2

([3, Theorem 5])

Suppose that \(n, M\), and λ are three natural numbers with \(\lambda \leqslant M < \lambda (n+1)\), \(z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{0,-1,\dots,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z^{M}}{(z)^{\lambda}_{n+1}}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda{k}+M} \frac{k^{M}}{(n!)^{\lambda}}\binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda} \sum ^{ \lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots,x_{j})}{j!(z+k)^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(5)

where

$$\begin{aligned} x_{i}=(i-1)! \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{M}{k^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

The partial fraction decomposition plays an important role in the study of the combinatorial identities and related questions (for example, see [28, 12, 15, 1723] and the references therein). But if a rational fraction is improper, the method of the partial fraction decomposition is invalid. So how do we decompose an improper rational fraction into partial fractions? Zhu and Luo answered this question using the contour integral and Cauchy’s residue theorem and gave an explicit decomposition for the general rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\). We rewrite the main result of Zhu and Luo as follows:

Theorem 3

([24, Theorem 1])

Suppose that M is any nonnegative integer, λ and n are any positive integers such that \(N=\lambda{n}\), and z is a complex number such that \(z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus \{-1,-2,\dots,-n\}\). Then the following partial fraction decomposition holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z^{M}}{(z+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}={}&\sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{j})}{j!}z^{M-N-j} \\ &{}+\sum^{n}_{k=1} \frac{(-1)^{\lambda{k}}}{(n!)^{\lambda}}\binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}(-k)^{ \lambda +M}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{j})}{j!(z+k)^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(6)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (-1)^{i}(i-1)! \sum ^{n}_{j=1}j^{i},\quad i=1,2, \ldots,M-N, \\ & y_{i}=(i-1)! \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{k^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots, \lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

When \(M-N \geq 0\) in Theorem 3, i.e., the rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\) is improper, putting \(a_{j}= \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{j})}{j!}\) and \(a_{k,j}=\frac{(-1)^{\lambda{k}}}{j!(n!)^{\lambda}}\binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}(-k)^{\lambda +M}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{j})\), (6) becomes the following explicit form:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0}a_{M-N-j}x^{j} + \sum^{n}_{k=1}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{a_{k,j}(x+k)^{j}}{(x+k)^{\lambda}}, \end{aligned}$$

which is an explicit result of the polynomial \(x^{M}\) divided by the polynomial \((x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}\). Therefore we say that Theorem 3 provides a new idea and method for the division of two general polynomials.

When \(M-N<0\), i.e., the degree of the numerator polynomial M is smaller than the degree of the denominator polynomial \(N=\lambda{n}\), we deduce Chu’s results (4) and (5). Therefore we say that Theorem 3 is an interesting extension of Chu’s results.

In the present paper, we will provide a q-analogue of Theorem 3 using the contour integral and Cauchy’s residue theorem. As some applications, we obtain the corresponding q-algebraic and q-combinatorial identities.

We state our main result in the following theorem.

Theorem 4

If z is a complex variable, M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n \lambda \), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{z^{M}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}} \\ &\quad=(-1)^{N}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!}z^{j} \\ &\qquad{} +\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(7)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (1-q)^{i}\sum ^{n}_{j=1} \bigl(q^{-j}[j] \bigr)^{i},\quad i=1,2,\ldots,M-N, \end{aligned}$$
(8)
$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(9)

Remark 5

Formula (7) is a q-analogue of formula (6).

2 q-Algebraic identities

In this section, we will provide the q-analogues of some algebraic identities.

When \(M< N\), we obtain the following q-algebraic identity:

Corollary 6

If z is a complex variable, M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n \lambda \), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} & \frac{z^{M}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}} \\ &\quad =\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{ \lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(10)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(11)

When \(M \geq N\), we give the following new and interesting q-algebraic identities: for \(M=N\), we have

Corollary 7

Suppose that z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers. Then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{z^{n\lambda}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}} \\ &\quad = \frac{(-1)^{{n\lambda}}}{q^{\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}} +\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +{n\lambda}}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(12)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=\lambda (i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[ \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{n+1}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2, \ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

For \(M=N+1\), we have

Corollary 8

Suppose that z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers. Then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{z^{n\lambda +1}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}} \\ &\quad = \frac{(-1)^{{n\lambda}}}{q^{\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}} \bigl(z+\lambda \bigl(q^{-n}[n]-n \bigr) \bigr) \\ &\qquad{}+\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +{n\lambda +1}}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(13)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda (n+1)+1}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(14)

For \(M=N+2\), we have

Corollary 9

Suppose that z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers. Then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z^{n\lambda +2}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}={}& \frac{(-1)^{{n\lambda}}}{q^{\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}} \biggl[z^{2}+ \lambda \bigl(q^{-n}[n]-n \bigr)z+\frac{1}{2} \bigl(\lambda \bigl(q^{-n}[n]-n\bigr) \bigr)^{2} \\ &{}+\lambda \biggl( \frac{[2n]}{(1+q)q^{2n}}-2q^{-n}[n]+3n \biggr) \biggr] \\ &{}+\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda (n+1)+2}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \\ &{}\times\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(15)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda (n+1)+2}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(16)

Taking \(M=0\) in (7), we deduce

Corollary 10

Suppose that z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers. Then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}= \sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{ \lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}} \bigl(1-q^{k}\bigr)^{\lambda}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-(z+1)q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(17)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(18)

Theorem 11

If z is a complex variable, M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n\lambda \). Then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q^{z}-1)^{M}}{(q^{z+1};q)_{n}^{\lambda}}={}&(-1)^{N}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!} \bigl(q^{z}-1\bigr)^{j} \\ &{} +\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{(k-1)}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{z+k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(19)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (1-q)^{i}\sum ^{n}_{j=1} \bigl(q^{-j}[j] \bigr)^{i},\quad i=1,2,\ldots,M-N, \end{aligned}$$
(20)
$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(21)

Proof

Letting \(z \mapsto q^{z}-1\) in Theorem 4, we obtain Theorem 11 immediately. □

Remark 12

Formula (19) is another q-analogue of Luo and Zhu result (6).

Theorem 13

If z is a complex variable, M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=\lambda (n+1)\), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(1-q^{z})^{M}}{(q^{z};q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}={}&(-1)^{M-N-\lambda}q^{- \lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{M-N-\lambda}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-\lambda -j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-\lambda -j})}{(M-N-\lambda -j)!} \bigl(q^{z}-1\bigr)^{j} \\ & {}+\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda k+M}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{z+k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(22)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (1-q)^{i}\sum ^{n}_{j=1} \bigl(q^{-j}[j] \bigr)^{i},\quad i=1,2,\ldots,M-N-\lambda, \end{aligned}$$
(23)
$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr], \quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(24)

Proof

Letting \(z \mapsto q^{z}-1\) and \(M \mapsto M-\lambda \), noting that \(\sum^{n}_{k=1}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}\) in Theorem 4, and applying the relation

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q^{z}-1)^{M}}{(q^{z+1};q)_{n}^{\lambda}}\equiv (-1)^{M} \frac{(1-q^{z})^{M+\lambda}}{(q^{z};q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}, \end{aligned}$$

we obtain Theorem 13 immediately. □

When \(M< N\), and noting that \(\sum^{n}_{k=1}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}\) in Theorem 13, we have

Corollary 14

If z is a complex variable, n and M are nonnegative integers, λ is a positive integer such that \(N=\lambda (n+1)\), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(1-q^{z})^{M}}{(q^{z};q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{ \lambda{k}+M}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum ^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{z+k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(25)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(26)

Remark 15

The algebraic identity (25) is just a q-analogue of Chu’s result (5).

Taking \(M=0\) in Corollary 14, we have

Corollary 16

If z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers, then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{(q^{z};q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}=\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{ \lambda{k}}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{z+k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(27)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=\lambda (i-1)!q^{ki} \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}\tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr), \quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(28)

Remark 17

The algebraic identity (27) is just a q-analogue of Chu’s result (4).

Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (27), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \prod_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1-q^{k}}{1-q^{z+k}}=\sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^{k}q^{ \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}\frac{1-q^{z}}{1-q^{z+k}}, \end{aligned}$$
(29)

which is a q-analogue of the well-known binomial identity (e.g., see [14]):

$$\begin{aligned} \prod_{k=1}^{n}\frac{k}{{z}+k}=\sum _{k=0}^{n}(-1)^{k} ({n\atop k }) \frac{{z}}{{z}+k}. \end{aligned}$$

Taking \(M=0\), \(n \mapsto n+1, z \mapsto z-1\), and then letting \(z \mapsto zq^{-1}\) in Theorem 4, we obtain the following corollary.

Corollary 18

If z is a complex variable, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=\lambda (n+1)\), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{(z;q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}= \sum^{{n}}_{k=0}(-1)^{ \lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-(k+1)j} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-zq^{k})^{\lambda -j}}, \end{aligned}$$
(30)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=\lambda (i-1)!q^{(k+1)i} \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr),\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(31)

Remark 19

The algebraic identity (30) is just another q-analogue of Chu’s result (4).

Taking \(\lambda =1\) and letting \(M \mapsto m\) in Theorem 4, we have

Corollary 20

If z is a complex variable, m is a nonnegative integer, and n is a positive integer, then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{z^{m}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}}={}&(-1)^{n}q^{-\binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{m-n}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{m-n-j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{m-n-j})}{(m-n-j)!}z^{j} \\ &{} +\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{{k-1}}q^{ \binom{k}{2}-km}{n \brack k}_{q} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{m+1}}{(q;q)_{n}}\frac{1}{1-(z+1)q^{k}}, \end{aligned}$$
(32)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (1-q)^{i}\sum ^{n}_{j=1} \bigl(q^{-j}[j] \bigr)^{i},\quad i=1,2,\ldots,m-n. \end{aligned}$$
(33)

Taking \(m=0\) in (32), we obtain the following q-algebraic identity:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{(q;q)_{n}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}}=\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{{k-1}}q^{ \binom{k}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q} \frac{1-q^{k}}{1-(z+1)q^{k}}. \end{aligned}$$
(34)

3 Further q-combinatorial identities

In this section, we will give the q-analogues of some combinatorial identities of Chu.

Taking \(z=0\) in (7), we obtain the following q-combinatorial identities involving q-harmonic numbers.

Corollary 21

If M is a nonnegative integers, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n\lambda \), then we have the following q-combinatorial identities:

$$\begin{aligned} &\sum_{k=1}^{n} (-1)^{\lambda{k}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum_{j=0}^{\lambda -1} \frac{q^{-k(M+j)}(1-q^{k})^{M+j}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{j})}{j!} \\ &\quad = \textstyle\begin{cases} (-1)^{\lambda}, & M=0, \\ 0, & 1 \leqslant M < N, \\ (-1)^{N-\lambda +1}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda } \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N})}{(M-N)!}, & M \geq N, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(35)

where

$$\begin{aligned} & x_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! (1-q)^{i}\sum ^{n}_{j=1} \bigl(q^{-j}[j] \bigr)^{i}, \quad i=1,2,\ldots,M-N, \end{aligned}$$
(36)
$$\begin{aligned} & y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$
(37)

Taking \(z=1\) in (7), we obtain the following q-combinatorial identities involving q-harmonic numbers:

$$\begin{aligned} &\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda (k-1)} q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-2q^{k})^{\lambda -j}} \\ &\quad =\frac{1}{(2q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}+(-1)^{N-1}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}} \sum ^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!}. \end{aligned}$$
(38)

Taking \(z=-1\) in (7), we obtain the following q-combinatorial identities involving q-harmonic numbers:

$$\begin{aligned} &\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{k}} q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0} \frac{q^{-kj}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!} \\ &\quad =(-1)^{M+\lambda}+(-1)^{N+\lambda -1}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!}(-1)^{j}. \end{aligned}$$
(39)

Taking \(z=1\) in (22), we obtain the following q-combinatorial identities involving q-harmonic numbers:

$$\begin{aligned} &\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda k+M} q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-kj} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{1+k})^{\lambda -j}} \\ &\quad =\frac{(1-q)^{M}}{(q;q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}-(-1)^{M-N-\lambda}q^{- \lambda \binom{n+1}{2}}\sum ^{M-N-\lambda}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-\lambda -j}(x_{1},\dots,x_{M-N-\lambda -j})}{(M-N-\lambda -j)!}(q-1)^{j}. \end{aligned}$$
(40)

Multiplying both sides of (10) by z and then letting \(z \to \infty \), we immediately establish the following combinatorial identities:

Corollary 22

If M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n\lambda \), then we have the following q-combinatorial identities:

$$\begin{aligned} & \sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda{k}}q^{\lambda \binom{k}{2}-kM-k} \bigl(1-q^{k}\bigr)^{ \lambda +M}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!} \\ &\quad = \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< N-1, \\ (-1)^{\lambda +M} \frac {(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{q^{{\lambda}\binom{n+1}{2}}}, & M=N-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(41)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)!q^{ki} \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i} \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{(1-q^{k})^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

Noting that \(\sum_{k=1}^{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\) in (41), we say that the above q-combinatorial identities are the corresponding q-analogues of Chu’s result [3, Corollary 7]:

$$\begin{aligned} \sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda{k}}k^{\lambda +M} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!}= \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< N-1, \\ (-1)^{\lambda +M}(n!)^{\lambda}, & M=N-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(42)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=(i-1)! \biggl[\lambda \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr)-\frac{\lambda +M}{k^{i}} \biggr],\quad i=1,2,\ldots, \lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

Taking \(\lambda =1,2,3,4\) in (41), respectively, we obtain the following q-combinatorial identities involving q-harmonic numbers:

$$\begin{aligned} &\sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{k}q^{\frac{(k^{2}-3k)}{2}-kM} \bigl(1-q^{k}\bigr)^{1+M}{n \brack k}_{q} = \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< n-1, \\ (-1)^{n} \frac {(q;q)_{n}}{q^{\binom{n+1}{2}}}, & M=n-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(43)
$$\begin{aligned} & \sum^{n}_{k=0}q^{k(k-2-M)} \bigl(1-q^{k}\bigr)^{M+2}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ 2} \biggl[2 (H_{k;q}-\tilde{H}_{n-k;q} )-\frac{M+2}{1-q^{k}} \biggr] \\ &\quad = \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< 2n-1, \\ \frac {(q;q)_{n}^{2}}{q^{{2}\binom{n+1}{2}}}, & M=2n-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(44)
$$\begin{aligned} & \sum^{n}_{k=0}(-1)^{k}q^{\frac{3(k^{2}-3k)}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{M+3}}{2!}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ 3} \biggl\{ \biggl[3 (H_{k;q}-\tilde{H}_{n-k;q} )-\frac{M+3}{(1-q^{k})} \biggr]^{2} \\ &\qquad {}+ \biggl[3 \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(2)}+\tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(2)} \bigr)- \frac{M+3}{(1-q^{k})^{2}} \biggr] \biggr\} \\ &\quad= \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< N-1, \\ (-1)^{n} \frac {(q;q)_{n}^{3}}{q^{{3}\binom{n+1}{2}}}, & M=N-1, \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(45)
$$\begin{aligned} & \sum^{n}_{k=1}q^{k(2k-3-M)} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{M+4}}{3!}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ 4} \biggl[ \biggl[4 (H_{k;q}-\tilde{H}_{n-k;q} )- \frac{M+4}{(1-q^{k})} \biggr]^{3} \\ &\qquad{}+3 \biggl[4 (H_{k;q}-\tilde{H}_{n-k;q} )- \frac{M+4}{(1-q^{k})} \biggr] \\ &\qquad{}\times \biggl[4 \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(2)}+\tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(2)} \bigr)- \frac{M+4}{(1-q^{k})^{2}} \biggr] + 2! \biggl[4 \bigl(H_{k;q}^{(3)}- \tilde{H}_{n-k;q}^{(3)} \bigr)-\frac{M+4}{(1-q^{k})^{3}} \biggr] \biggr] \\ &\quad = \textstyle\begin{cases} 0, & 0 \leqslant M< N-1, \\ \frac {(q;q)_{n}^{4}}{q^{{4}\binom{n+1}{2}}}, & M=N-1. \end{cases}\displaystyle \end{aligned}$$
(46)

Taking \(z=0\) in (30), we obtain the following q-combinatorial identity:

$$\begin{aligned} \sum^{{n}}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-(k+1)j} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!}=(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}, \end{aligned}$$
(47)

where \(y_{i}\) is given by (31).

Taking \(z=-1\) in (30), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sum^{{n}}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-(k+1)j} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1+q^{k})^{\lambda -j}}= \frac {(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{ [2(1+q)(1+q^{2})\cdots (1+q^{n}) ]^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$
(48)

Taking \(z=q\) in (30), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sum^{{n}}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-(k+1)j} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1-q^{k+1})^{\lambda -j}}= \frac{1}{(1-q^{n+1})^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$
(49)

Taking \(z=-q\) in (30), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sum^{{n}}_{k=0}(-1)^{\lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}q^{-(k+1)j} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(y_{1},\dots,y_{j})}{j!(1+q^{k+1})^{\lambda -j}}= \frac{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{(-q;q)_{n+1}^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$
(50)

Multiplying both sides of (30) by z and then letting \(z \to \infty \), we establish the following q-combinatorial identities:

Corollary 23

Suppose that λ and n are positive integers. We have the following q-combinatorial identity:

$$\begin{aligned} \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^{\lambda k}q^{\lambda \binom{k+1}{2}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda}{ \mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{\lambda -1})=0, \end{aligned}$$
(51)

where \(y_{i}\) are given by (31).

Remark 24

The combinatorial identity (51) is a q-analogue of Chu’s result [3, Corollary 3]:

$$\begin{aligned} \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^{\lambda k} \binom{n}{k}^{ \lambda}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{ \lambda -1}(y_{1}, y_{2}, \dots,y_{\lambda -1})=0, \end{aligned}$$
(52)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{i}=\lambda (i-1)! \bigl(H_{k}^{(i)}+(-1)^{i}H_{n-k}^{(i)} \bigr),\quad i=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1. \end{aligned}$$

Taking \(\lambda =1\) in (51), we have

$$\begin{aligned} \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^{k}q^{-k}{n \brack k}_{q}=0, \end{aligned}$$

which is a q-analogue of the well-known identity

$$\begin{aligned} \sum_{k=0}^{n} (-1)^{k} \binom{n}{k}=0. \end{aligned}$$

4 Proof of Theorem 4

Lemma 25

If z is a complex variable, M is a nonnegative integer, n and λ are two positive integers such that \(N=n \lambda \), then the following q-algebraic identity holds:

$$\begin{aligned} &\frac{z^{M}}{((z+1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}} \\ &\quad =(-1)^{N}q^{-\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}} \frac {\mathbf{B}_{M-N}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{M-N})}{(M-N)!} \\ &\qquad{} +\sum^{n}_{k=1}(-1)^{\lambda (k-1)-1}q^{\frac{\lambda (k^{2}-3k)}{2}-kM} \frac{(1-q^{k})^{\lambda +M}}{(q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}{n \brack k}_{q}^{ \lambda} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1},y_{2}, \dots, y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!(z-q^{-k}+1)}, \end{aligned}$$
(53)

where

$$\begin{aligned} y_{s}=& (s-1)! \Biggl(\sum ^{n}_{j=1,j\neq{k}} \frac{\lambda}{ (q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{s}}-\frac{M}{(q^{-k}-1)^{s}}+ \frac{(-1)^{s}}{(z-q^{-k}+1)^{s}} \Biggr),\quad s=1,2,\ldots,\lambda -1, \end{aligned}$$
(54)
$$\begin{aligned} z_{s}=& (s-1)! \Biggl(\sum ^{n}_{j=1}\lambda \bigl(q^{-j}-1 \bigr)^{s}+z^{s} \Biggr),\quad s=1,2,\ldots,M-N. \end{aligned}$$
(55)

Proof

We first construct two polynomials \(P(z)\) and \(Q(z)\) of degree M and \(N+1\), respectively, which are given by

$$\begin{aligned} P(z)=z^{M} \quad\text{and}\quad Q(z)=(z-\alpha )\prod _{j=1}^{n}\bigl(z-q^{-j}+1 \bigr)^{ \lambda}, \end{aligned}$$

such that \(\alpha \neq q^{-1}-1,q^{-2}-1,\ldots,q^{-n}-1\).

We next construct three contour integrals for the rational functions \(P(z)/Q(z)\):

  • \(\oint _{\Gamma}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where Γ is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the single pole α of \(P(z)/Q(z)\);

  • \(\oint _{\Gamma '} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where \({\Gamma}'\) is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the poles \(q^{-1}-1,q^{-2}-1, \dots, q^{-n}-1\) of \(P(z)/Q(z)\);

  • \(\oint _{\Gamma ''} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), where \({\Gamma}''\) is a simple closed contour which only surrounds the pole ∞ of \(P(z)/Q(z)\).

In the extended complex plane, since the total sum of residues of a rational function at all finite poles and that at infinity is equal to zero [13, Theorem 2], we have

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{\Gamma +{\Gamma}'+{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z=0, \end{aligned}$$

or equivalently,

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{\Gamma}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z=- \oint _{{\Gamma}''} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z- \oint _{{\Gamma}'}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)} \,\mathrm{d}z. \end{aligned}$$
(56)

Below we compute the contour integrals \(\oint _{\Gamma}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z, \oint _{{\Gamma}'} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), and \(\oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\), respectively.

We compute the contour integral \(\oint _{ {\Gamma}}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z & =2\pi{i} \operatorname*{Res}_{z=\alpha}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)} \\ & =2\pi{i} \operatorname*{Res}_{z=\alpha} \frac{z^{M}}{(z-\alpha )\prod_{j=1}^{n}(z-q^{-j}+1)^{\lambda}} \\ & =2\pi{i} \frac{\alpha ^{M}}{\prod^{n}_{j=1}(\alpha -q^{-j}+1)^{\lambda}} \\ & =2\pi{i} (-1)^{N}q^{\lambda \binom{n+1}{2}} \frac{\alpha ^{M}}{((\alpha +1)q;q)_{n}^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$
(57)

We calculate the contour integral \(\oint _{{\Gamma}''} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\) as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z&=2{\pi}i \operatorname*{Res}_{z=\infty}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)} =-2{\pi}i \operatorname*{Res}_{t=0}\frac{1}{t^{2}} \frac{P (\frac{1}{t} )}{Q (\frac{1}{t} )}\\ & =-2 \pi{i}\operatorname*{Res}_{t=0} \frac{t^{N-M-1}}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$

If \(M-N<0\), then \(t=0\) is not a pole, and so we have

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z=-2\pi{i} \operatorname*{Res}_{t=0} \frac{t^{N-M-1}}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}}=0. \end{aligned}$$

If \(M-N=0\), then \(t=0\) is a single pole of order 1, so we have

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z= &=-2\pi{i} \operatorname*{Res}_{t=0}\frac{1}{t} \frac{1}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}} \\ &=-2\pi{i}\lim_{t \to 0} \frac{1}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}} \\ &=-2\pi{i}. \end{aligned}$$

If \(M-N>0\), then \(t=0\) is a single pole of order \(M-N\). By utilizing Cauchy’s residue theorem, noting that the power series expansion of the logarithmic function is

$$\begin{aligned} \log (1+z)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}(-1)^{n-1} \frac{z^{n}}{n} \bigl( \vert z \vert < 1\bigr) \end{aligned}$$

and using the definition of complete Bell polynomials, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z &=-2\pi{i} \operatorname*{Res}_{t=0} \frac{t^{N-M-1}}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}} \\ & =-2\pi{i}\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr] \frac{1}{ (1-t\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(1-t(q^{-j}-1))^{\lambda}} \\ & =-2\pi{i}\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ {\sum _{k=1}^{\infty } \Biggl[(k-1)! \Biggl(\alpha ^{k}+\sum^{n}_{j=1}\lambda \bigl(q^{-j}-1\bigr)^{k} \Biggr) \frac{t^{k}}{k!} \Biggr]} \Biggr\} \\ & =-2\pi{i}\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty } \mathbf{B}_{k}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots,z_{k}) \frac{t^{k}}{k!} \\ & =-\frac {2{\pi}i }{(M-N)!}\mathbf{B}_{M-N}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{M-N}). \end{aligned}$$

We get

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}''}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z=- \frac {2{\pi}i }{(M-N)!}\mathbf{B}_{M-N}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{M-N}). \end{aligned}$$
(58)

We now calculate the contour integral \(\oint _{ {\Gamma}'}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z\). By utilizing Cauchy’s residue theorem, noting that the power series expansion of the logarithmic function is

$$\begin{aligned} \log (1+z)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}(-1)^{n-1} \frac{z^{n}}{n} \quad\bigl( \vert z \vert < 1\bigr) \end{aligned}$$

and using the definition of complete Bell polynomials, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}'}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z ={}&2\pi{i}\sum ^{n}_{k=1} \operatorname*{Res}_{z=q^{-k}-1} \frac{P(z)}{Q(z)} \\ ={}&2\pi{i}\sum^{n}_{k=1} \operatorname*{Res}_{z=q^{-k}-1} \frac{z^{M}}{ (z-\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1}(z-q^{-j}+1)^{\lambda}} \\ ={}&2\pi{i}\sum^{n}_{k=1}\bigl[ \bigl(z-q^{-k}-1\bigr)^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \frac{z^{M}}{(z-\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1\atop {j}\neq{k}}(z-q^{-j}+1)^{\lambda}} \\ ={}&2\pi{i}\sum^{n}_{k=1} \bigl[z^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \frac{(z+q^{-k}-1)^{M}}{ (z+q^{-k}-1-\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1\atop {j}\neq{k}}(z+q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{\lambda}} \\ ={}&2\pi{i}\sum^{n}_{k=1} \Biggl[ \frac{(q^{-k}-1)^{M}}{ (q^{-k}-1-\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1 \atop j \neq k}(q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{\lambda}} \\ &{} \times \bigl[z^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \exp \Biggl(M\log \biggl(1+ \frac{z}{q^{-k}-1} \biggr) - \log \biggl(1+\frac{z}{q^{-k}-q^{-j}} \biggr) \\ &{}-\sum ^{n}_{j=1,j \neq {k}}\lambda \log \biggl(1+ \frac{z}{q^{-k}-q^{-j}} \biggr) \Biggr) \Biggr] \\ ={}&2\pi{i}\sum^{n}_{k=1} \Biggl\{ \frac{(q^{-k}-1)^{M}}{ (q^{-k}-1-\alpha )\prod^{n}_{j=1\atop {j}\neq{k}}(q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{\lambda}} \\ &{} \times \bigl[z^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \exp \Biggl[\sum ^{\infty}_{s=1}(-1)^{s}(s-1)! \\ &{}\times \Biggl(\sum ^{n}_{j=1,j\neq{k}}\frac{\lambda}{ (q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{s}}- \frac{M}{(q^{-k}-1)^{s}}+ \frac{(-1)^{s}}{(\alpha -q^{-k}+1)^{s}} \Biggr) \Biggr]\frac{z^{s}}{s!} \Biggr\} . \end{aligned}$$

Noting that

$$\begin{aligned} {\mathbf{{B}}}_{n}\bigl(-x_{1}, (-1)^{2}x_{2}, \dots, (-1)^{n}x_{n}\bigr)=(-1)^{n}{ \mathbf{{B}}}_{n}(x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots, x_{n}), \end{aligned}$$

it follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \oint _{{\Gamma}'}\frac{P(z)}{Q(z)}\,\mathrm{d}z=2\pi{i}\sum ^{n}_{k=1} \frac{(-1)^{\lambda}(q^{-k}-1)^{M}{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1},y_{2}, \dots, y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)! (\alpha -q^{-k}+1) \prod^{n}_{j=1\atop {j} \neq {k}}(q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{\lambda}}. \end{aligned}$$
(59)

Therefore, by substituting (57)–(59) into (56), and then changing \(\alpha \mapsto z\), we obtain Lemma 25. This proof is complete. □

Lemma 26

The following recursion formula of complete Bell polynomial holds true:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1},\dots,y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!}= \sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}(-1)^{\lambda -j-1} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(w_{1},\dots,w_{j})}{j!(z-q^{-k}+1)^{\lambda -j-1}}, \end{aligned}$$
(60)

where

$$\begin{aligned} w_{s}=(s-1)! \Biggl[\sum^{n}_{j=1,j\neq{k}} \frac{\lambda}{(q^{-k}-q^{-j})^{s}}-\frac{M}{(q^{-k}-1)^{s}} \Biggr]. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

Write \(y_{s}=w_{s}+(-1)^{s} \frac{(s-1)!}{(z-q^{-k}+1)^{s}}\) in (54). From the definition of a complete Bell polynomial, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{\lambda -1}(y_{1},\dots,y_{\lambda -1})}{(\lambda -1)!} & =\bigl[t^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\mathbf{B}_{n}(y_{1},y_{2}, \dots, y_{n})\frac{t^{n}}{n!}=\bigl[t^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \exp \Biggl(\sum_{n=1}^{ \infty}y_{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr) \\ &=\bigl[t^{\lambda -1}\bigr] \exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \biggl(w_{n}+(-1)^{n} \frac{(n-1)!}{(z-q^{-k}+1)^{n}} \biggr) \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \\ &=\bigl[t^{\lambda -1}\bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}w_{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{n}(n-1)!}{(z-q^{-k}+1)^{n}}\frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \\ &=\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}\bigl[t^{j} \bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}w_{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \bigl[t^{\lambda -1-j}\bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ \sum _{n=1}^{ \infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{n} \biggl( \frac{t}{z-q^{-k}+1} \biggr)^{n} \Biggr\} \\ &=\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}\frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(w_{1},\dots,w_{j})}{j!} \bigl[t^{ \lambda -1-j}\bigr]\exp \biggl\{ -\log \biggl(1+\frac{t}{z-q^{-k}+1} \biggr) \biggr\} \\ &=\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}\frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(w_{1},\dots,w_{j})}{j!} \bigl[t^{ \lambda -1-j}\bigr] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-1)^{n} \biggl( \frac{t}{z-q^{-k}+1} \biggr)^{n} \\ &=\sum^{\lambda -1}_{j=0}(-1)^{\lambda -j-1} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{j}(w_{1},\dots,w_{j})}{j!(z-q^{-k}+1)^{\lambda -j-1}}. \end{aligned}$$

In the above process, we apply the binomial theorem:

$$\begin{aligned} (1-z)^{-r}=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \binom{r+n-1}{r-1}z^{n}\quad \bigl( \vert z \vert < 1\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

 □

Lemma 27

The following recursion formula of complete Bell polynomial holds true:

$$\begin{aligned} \frac {\mathbf{B}_{M-N}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{M-N})}{(M-N)!}=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(v_{1},\dots,v_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!}z^{j}, \end{aligned}$$
(61)

where

$$\begin{aligned} v_{s}=(s-1)! \sum^{n}_{j=1} \lambda \bigl(q^{-j}-1\bigr)^{s}. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

Write \(z_{s}=v_{s}+(s-1)!z^{s}\) in (55). Using the definition of a complete Bell polynomial, we obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \frac {\mathbf{B}_{M-N}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{M-N})}{(M-N)!} & =\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr] \sum _{n=0}^{\infty}\mathbf{B}_{n}(z_{1},z_{2}, \dots, z_{n}) \frac{t^{n}}{n!}=\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr] \exp \Biggl(\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}z_{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr) \\ &=\bigl[t^{M-N}\bigr] \exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \bigl(v_{n}+(n-1)! z^{n} \bigr)\frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \\ &=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0}\bigl[t^{M-N-j} \bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}v_{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n!} \Biggr\} \bigl[t^{j}\bigr]\exp \Biggl\{ \sum _{n=1}^{\infty}z^{n} \frac{t^{n}}{n} \Biggr\} \\ &=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(v_{1},\dots,v_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!} \bigl[t^{j}\bigr]\exp \bigl\{ -\log (1-zt) \bigr\} \\ &=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(v_{1},\dots,v_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!} \bigl[t^{j}\bigr] \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (zt )^{n} \\ &=\sum^{M-N}_{j=0} \frac{{\mathbf{{B}}}_{M-N-j}(v_{1},\dots,v_{M-N-j})}{(M-N-j)!}z^{j}. \end{aligned}$$

In the above process, we apply the binomial theorem:

$$\begin{aligned} (1-z)^{-r}=\sum^{\infty}_{n=0} \binom{r+n-1}{r-1}z^{n} \quad\bigl( \vert z \vert < 1\bigr). \end{aligned}$$

 □

Proof

Proof of Theorem 4 Substituting (60) and (61) into (53), and then changing \(w_{j} \mapsto y_{j} \) and \(v_{j} \mapsto x_{j} \), we obtain Theorem 4. This proof is complete. □

5 Conclusions

As it is well known, the basic (or q-) series and basic (or q-) polynomials, especially the basic (or q-) hypergeometric functions and basic (or q-)hypergeometric polynomials, have widespread applications, particularly in several areas of number theory and combinatorial analysis such as the theory of partitions. In [19, p. 340], professor Srivastava points out an important demonstrated observation that any \((p,q)\)-variations of the proposed q-results would be trivially inconsequential because the additional parameter p is obviously redundant.

In the last section (see [24, Conclusions]), Zhu and Luo suggested an open problem which would yield the corresponding basic (or q-) extensions of Theorem 3 (see [24, Theorem 1]). In the present paper, we here have answered this question applying the contour integral and Cauchy’s residue theorem and given a q-explicit analogue by decomposing the general rational function \(\frac{x^{M}}{(x+1)^{\lambda}_{n}}\).

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Andrews, G.E., Askey, R., Roy, R.: Special Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu, W.: Partial fractions and bilateral summations. J. Math. Phys. 35, 2036–2042 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, W.: Harmonic number identities and Hermite–Padé approximations to the logarithm function. J. Approx. Theory 137, 42–56 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu, W.: Hypergeometric approach to Weideman’s conjecture. Arch. Math. 87, 400–406 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu, W.: Partial-fraction decompositions and harmonic number identities. J. Comb. Math. Comb. Comput. 60, 139–153 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu, W.: Partial fraction decompositions and trigonometric sum identities. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 136, 229–237 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chu, W.: Partial fractions and Riesz’ interpolation formula for trigonometric polynomials. Am. Math. Mon. 125, 175–178 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu, W., Marini, A.: Partial fractions and trigonometric identities. Adv. Appl. Math. 23, 115–175 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Comtet, L.: Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions. Reidel, Dordrecht (1974)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Driver, K., Prodinger, H., Schneider, C., Weideman, J.A.C.: Padé approximations to the logarithm. II. Identities, recurrences, and symbolic computation. Ramanujan J. 11(2), 139–158 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gasper, G., Rahman, M.: Basic Hypergeometric Series, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Goubi, M.: r-Bell polynomials and derangement polynomials identities using exponential partial Bell polynomials. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 5, 54–64 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitrinović, D.S., Kečkić, J.D.: The Cauchy Method of Residues. Theory and Applications. Mathematics and Its Applications (East European Series), vol. 9. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984). Translated from the Serbian by Kečkić

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Peterson, J.: A probabilistic proof of a binomial identity. Am. Math. Mon. 120, 558–562 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rassias, T.M., Srivastava, H.M.: Some classes of infinite series associated with the Riemann Zeta and Polygamma functions and generalized harmonic numbers. Appl. Math. Comput. 131, 593–605 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Riordan, J.: Combinatorial Identities. Wiley, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sofo, A., Srivastava, H.M.: Identities for the harmonic numbers and binomial coefficients. Ramanujan J. 25, 93–113 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sofo, A., Srivastava, H.M.: A family of shifted harmonic sums. Ramanujan J. 37, 89–108 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Srivastava, H.M.: Operators of basic (or q-) calculus and fractional q-calculus and their applications in geometric function theory of complex analysis. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A, Sci. 44, 327–344 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Srivastava, H.M.: A survey of some recent developments on higher transcendental functions of analytic number theory and applied mathematics. Symmetry 13, 1–22 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Srivastava, H.M.: Some parametric and argument variations of the operators of fractional calculus and related special functions and integral transformations. J. Nonlinear Convex Anal. 22, 1501–1520 (2021)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Srivastava, H.M., Raina, R.K.: Some combinatorial series identities. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 96, 9–13 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu, J.-M., Luo, Q.-M.: A novel proof of two partial fraction decompositions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2021, 274 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, J.-M., Luo, Q.-M.: Partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function and its application. Adv. Cont. Discr. Mod. 2023, Article ID 1 (2023)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Professor H. M. Srivastava for his references.

Funding

No.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

There was an equal amount of contributions from the two authors. They both read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiu-Ming Luo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, ZQ., Luo, QM. A q-analogue for partial-fraction decomposition of a rational function and its application. Adv Cont Discr Mod 2024, 18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-024-03814-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-024-03814-7

Mathematics Subject Classification

Keywords