 Research
 Open access
 Published:
Finitetime synchronization problem of a class of discontinuous Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with mixed delays via new switching design
Advances in Difference Equations volume 2021, Article number: 396 (2021)
Abstract
This paper investigates a class of generalized Cohen–Grossberg neural networks (CGNNs) with discontinuous activations and mixed delays. Based on the nonsmooth analysis theory, the driveresponse concept, differential inclusions theory, we give several basic assumptions to gain the finitetime synchronization issue of CGNNs. Sufficient conditions are provided without the boundedness or monotonicity of discontinuous activation functions. Moreover, one can estimate the settling time’s upper bounds of the system. At last, two numerical examples and their simulations are given to further show the benefits of the obtained control approach.
1 Introduction
Recently, the research of neural networks with discontinuous activation functions has gradually attracted the attention of many researchers, including systems oscillating under earthquake, power circuits, chaos phenomenon, and dry friction (see [1–4]). Because the nonLipschitz phenomenon has many special advantages, the emergence of nonsmooth has greatly improved the research of neural networks. In addition, the analysis of neural networks with discontinuous activations is accompanied by many interesting practical phenomena to explore important dynamic behavior characteristics. This arouses researchers’ interest in the generalized neural networks by using discontinuous activation functions [5–8].
In 1983, Cohen and Grossberg firstly introduced the CGNNs system, which was a useful recurrent neural networks system, including evolutionary theory, population biology, neurobiology [9]. After that, a large number of results have emerged [10–17] such as the existence, dissipation, and exponential stability of the CGNNs model. However, there are few works on discontinuous CGNNs system with mixed delays. In [18–20], the authors investigated the exponential stability and exponential synchronization of a class of CGNNs. Abdurahman and his team in [21] studied the exponential lag synchronization for both discrete timedelays and distributed delays CGNNs. It worthy to know that, in 2003, Forti introduced the global stability of a discontinuous righthand side neural network system via the framework of the theory of Filippov differential inclusions [22, 23]. In [24] they pointed out that the sliding mode method was used to solve constrained optimization problems, because highgain neuron activations were often encountered in the neural networks system. In [25], the authors analyzed the fixedtime synchronization of a class of discontinuous fuzzy inertial neural networks with timevarying delays based on the new improved fixedtime stability lemmas.
As we know, the synchronization phenomenon has been widely used in software engineering, ecological structure, security storage, information processing system, and many other fields, which gets a lot of social attention. There are some micro motions from the view of the mathematical model, which we call qualitative or stability problems. Meanwhile, the researchers pay attention to the macroscopic topology based on the synchronization problem. The literature [26] was the first paper to consider finitetime control of discontinuous chaotic systems, and [27] studied the finitetime synchronization of timedelayed neural networks. There were many classifications of synchronization, such as antisynchronization [28, 29], exponential synchronization [30], robust synchronization [31], chaos synchronization [32], and so on. The synchronization technologies mentioned above have many defects in a real practical environment. For instance, the existence results of the above synchronization usually are guaranteed over the infinite horizon. In addition, when the finite initial value is required and the control accuracy has great influence on the system, it is always difficult to estimate. Moreover, even if stringent convergence time is given, the neural networks model may not be available in a real experimental environment. For the sake of convergence time, one needs to propose a concept named finitetime synchronization, which means that the settling time function of any finite initial value is bounded. Song and his team provided a novel and effective techniques method in [33], then in [34] they investigated the finitetime synchronization problem of a class of discontinuous neural networks with nonlinear coupling and mixed delays. Peng and his team in [35] investigated the finitetime synchronization control methodology for the CGNNs system. Yang in [36] verified that the considered neural networks can gain the synchronization in a finite time. In [37], the authors ensured that the target model realized the finitetime synchronization goal of the coupled neural networks. In [38], the author solved the challenging issues in the field of finitetime synchronization of the cellular neural networks.
Motivated by the aforementioned works on finitetime synchronization of CGNNs system, this paper aims to realize the finitetime synchronization issue for the considered system CGNNs. Our main contributions of this paper include the following three aspects.

The CGNNs discussed in this brief are statedependent discontinuous systems; based on the properties of differential inclusion and setanalysis theory, the driveresponse CGNNs can be transformed into a synchronization error system. Theoretical analysis can be extended to other fields.

When both mixed delays and discontinuities exist in the dynamical CGNNs, how to deal with the discrepancy within the scope of the Filippov solutions of the drive system and the response system?

Because the system has special discontinuous characteristics, in order to shorten the settling time of the driveresponse CGNNs system, the more ingenious switching controller should be devised.
2 Model description and some basic definitions
This section considers a general class of discontinuous CGNNs with mixed delays. Based on the previous works [39–45], one can describe the model by the following equation:
the state vector is \(\pi (t)=(\pi _{1}(t),\pi _{2}(t),\ldots ,\pi _{n}(t))^{T}\in {\mathbb {R}}\); \(\varpi _{i}(\cdot )\) is the amplification function of the system; \(a_{i}(\cdot )\) is the function with proper behavior; \(\tau _{ij}(t)\) and \(K_{ij}: [0,\infty )\rightarrow [0,\infty )\) denote the discrete delay and the distributed delay, respectively; \(b_{ij}(t)\) and \(c_{ij}(t)\) are the connection strength and the delayed feedbacks of two different neurons; \(f_{j}(\cdot )\) is the neuron input–output activation of the ith neuron; \(I_{i}(\cdot )\) is an input signal function of the external factors;
The neuron activation functions \(f_{j}(\cdot )\) in the above model satisfy the following conditions:

(H1)
\(f_{i}:{\mathbb {R}}\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) is discontinuous on a countable set of isolate point \(\{\rho ^{i}_{k}\}\) for each \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\).

(H2)
There are two nonnegative constants \(L_{i}\) and \(h_{i}\) that satisfy the following inequality:
$$ \bigl\Vert \mathbb{F}\bigl[f_{i}(x)f_{i}(y)\bigr] \bigr\Vert =\sup_{\zeta _{i}\in \mathbb{F}[f_{i}(x)f_{i}(y)]} \Vert \zeta _{i} \Vert \leq L_{i} \Vert xy \Vert +h_{i},\quad i=1,2, \ldots ,n, $$where \(\mathbb{F}(f_{i}(x))=K[f_{i}(x)]= [\min \{f_{i}(x_{i}^{}),f_{i}(x_{i}^{+}) \},\max \{f_{i}(x_{i}^{}),f_{i}(x_{i}^{+})\} ]\).

(H3)
There exist nonnegative constants \(K_{ij}\) satisfying
$$ \int ^{+\infty }_{0}K_{ij}(\cdot ) \,\mathrm{d}s\leq K_{ij},\quad i,j=1,2 \ldots ,n. $$
For every \(i,j=1,2,\ldots ,n\), we assume that \(a_{i}(t)\), \(b_{ij}(t)\), \(c_{ij}(t)\), \(\tau _{ij}(t)\) are continuous ωperiodic functions and \(I_{i}(t)\) are almost periodic functions; \(0\leq \tau _{ij}(t)\leq \tau _{ij}\), \(\dot{\tau }_{ij}(t)\leq \sigma _{ij}<1\); \(\varpi _{i}(\cdot )\) is continuous and \(0<\underline{\omega }\leq \varpi _{i}(\cdot )\leq \overline{\omega }\); \(\dot{a}_{i}(\cdot )\geq a_{i}\), where \(\tau _{ij}\), \(\sigma _{ij}\), \(\underline{\omega }\), ω̅, and \(a_{i}\) are nonnegative constants. Moreover, we denote \(a^{\max }=\max_{1\leq i\leq n}\sup_{t\in {\mathbb {R}}}a_{i}(t)\), \(b^{\max }=\max_{1\leq i\leq n, 1\leq j\leq n}\sup_{t\in {\mathbb {R}}}b_{ij}(t)\), \(c^{\max }=\max_{1\leq i\leq n, 1\leq j\leq n}\sup_{t\in {\mathbb {R}}}c_{ij}(t)\).
Choose a transformation function \(\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\cdot )\), which satisfies
From the above discussion we know that \(\frac{1}{\varpi _{i}(u)}>0\), which yields that \(\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\cdot )\) is strictly monotone increasing, then the inverse function of \(\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\cdot )\) exists, we denote \((\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\cdot ))^{1}=\Phi _{i}(\cdot )\). Let \(x_{i}(t)=\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\pi _{i}(t))\), one can have \(\pi _{i}(t)=\Phi _{i}(x(t))\) and \(\frac{\mathrm{d}{x}_{i}(t)}{\mathrm{d}t}= \frac{\mathrm{d}\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\pi _{i}(t))}{\mathrm{d}\pi _{i}(t)} \dot{\pi }_{i}(t)=\frac{1}{\varpi _{i}(\pi _{i}(t))}\dot{\pi }_{i}(t)\), then we can obtain that
Obviously, in the framework of differential inclusions, system (2) can be rewritten as follows:
For any compact interval of \([0,\tau )\), the vector function \(x=(x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{n})^{T}\) is continuous and absolutely continuous. According to the Filippov framework, one can find a measurable function \(\gamma =(\gamma _{1},\gamma _{2},\ldots ,\gamma _{n})^{T}:(\infty , \tau )\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) such that \(\gamma _{i}(t)\in K[f_{i}(\Phi _{i}(x_{i}(t)))]\), then one can obtain that x is a state solution of CGNNs and
Through the above discussion, consider CGNNs system (1) as the drive system. By giving the initial value of CGNNs \(\phi (s)=(\phi _{1}(s),\phi _{2}(s),\ldots ,\phi _{n}(s))^{T}\), we can obtain the corresponding response system as follows:
where \(u_{i}(t)\) is the appropriate controller.
Similarly, let \(y_{i}(t)=\Phi ^{1}_{i}(\xi _{i}(t))\), \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\), we can derive that
where \(\widetilde{\gamma }_{i}(t)\in K[f_{i}(\Phi _{i}(y_{i}(t)))]\) and \(\widetilde{\gamma }(t)=(\gamma _{1}(t),\gamma _{2}(t),\ldots ,\gamma _{n}(t))^{T}\).
Lemma 2.1
If \(V(y(t)):{\mathbb {R}}^{n}\times {\mathbb {R}}\) is a Cregular function, for any compact interval of \([0,+\infty )\), \(y(t):[0,+\infty )\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}^{n}\) is an absolutely continuous function. For a continuous function \(\Upsilon :(0,\infty )\rightarrow {\mathbb {R}}\) with \(\Upsilon (\varrho )>0\) for \(\varrho \in (0,+\infty )\), if it satisfies that
and
then we have \(V(t)=0\) for \(t\geq t^{*}\); especially, we have:

(1)
If \(\Upsilon =K_{1}\varrho +K_{2}\varrho ^{\mu }\) for all \(\varrho >0\), where \(\mu \in (0,1)\) and \(K_{1},K_{2}>0\), then one can estimate the settling time as
$$ t^{*}=\frac{1}{K_{1}(1\mu )}\ln \frac{K_{1}V^{1\mu }(0)+K_{2}}{K_{2}}. $$ 
(2)
If \(\Upsilon (\varrho )=K\varrho ^{\mu }\) and \(K>0\), then one can estimate the settling time as
$$ t^{*}=\frac{V^{1\mu }(0)}{K(1\mu )}. $$
Remark 2.2
Since \(\Phi (\cdot )\) is strictly monotone increasing and \(a_{i}(\Phi _{i}(t))\) is an abstract function which contains linear functions as special cases. In other words, we can express \(a_{i}(\Phi _{i}(t))\) as a common function \(D_{i}(t)\Phi _{i}(t)\). Compared with the existing papers, our model which considers CGNNs is more general and common of previous results.
3 Main results
Firstly, we focus on ensuring the finitetime synchronization issue between the above response model (4) and the drive model (1). Let \(e_{i}(t)=y_{i}(t)x_{i}(t)\), \(i=1,2,\ldots ,n\), one can obtain
where \(\gamma ^{*}_{j}(t)=\widetilde{\gamma }_{j}(t)\gamma _{j}(t)\).
Then we consider the following two kinds of important controllers to achieve the finitetime synchronization issue.
Case (1). The statefeedback controller \(u_{i}(t)\):
where \(i=1,2,\ldots ,N\), \(k_{1}, k_{2}>0\).
Case (2). The corresponding adaptive controller \(u_{i}(t)\)s of Case (1):
where \(P=\operatorname{diag}(p_{1},p_{2},\ldots ,p_{n})\), \(Q=\operatorname{diag}(q_{1},q_{2},\ldots ,q_{n})\), and the controller rules of \(p_{i}\) and \(q_{i}\) are as follows:
\(\rho _{i}\) and \(\varrho _{i}\) are arbitrary positive constants.
Theorem 3.1
If conditions (H1)–(H3) are supported, the response system (4) with statefeedback controller (7) can synchronize to the corresponding drive system (1) in a finitetime if the following assumption holds:

(H4)
\(\underline{\omega }+ \frac{k_{1}\cdot \underline{\omega }}{\overline{\omega }}> (b^{\max }+c^{ \max }+K^{\max } )\cdot nL^{\max }\) and \(\frac{k_{2}}{\overline{\omega }}> (b^{\max }+c^{\max }+K^{\max } ) \cdot nh^{\max }\).
Proof
Let
where \(e(t)=(e_{1}(t),e_{2}(t),\ldots ,e_{n}(t))^{T}\).
Obviously \(V(t)\) is Cregular. The derivative of Lyapunov function \(V(t)\) can be obtained along the error system (6) as follows:
Based on the definition of function \(\Phi (\cdot )\) and generalized mean value theorem, one can have
From assumptions (H1)–(H2), we can obtain that
and
From condition (H3), similarly we have
Moreover, because \(\Phi _{i}(\cdot )\) is strictly monotone increasing, which implies that \(\operatorname{sign}(\Phi _{i}(y_{i}(t))\Phi _{i}(x_{i}(t)))=\operatorname{sign}(y_{i}(t)x_{i}(t))= \operatorname{sign}e_{i}(t)\), then we obtain
Recalling controller (9) and combined with equations (10)–(15), based on the basic inequalities of Jensen’s inequality, one can gain
Then, according to assumption (H4) in this theorem, one can see \(\kappa _{1}>0\) and \(\kappa _{2}>0\), then we know that the origin of error system (6) is finitetime stable with feedback controller (7), and the settling time is obtained by
□
Theorem 3.2
If conditions (H1)–(H3) are supported, then the response system (4) with adaptive controller (8) can synchronize to the corresponding drive system (1).
Proof
In this proof, we let the new Lyapunov functional be as follows:
where θ and ϑ are positive constants to be determined.
The derivative of Lyapunov function \(V(t)\) can be obtained along the error system (6) as follows:
Since
It follows from (18)–(19), recalling (10)–(13), one can deduce that
Based on the definition of θ and ϑ, we can choose suitable values of θ and ϑ to make \(\kappa _{3}=\underline{\omega }+ \frac{\theta \cdot \underline{\omega }}{\overline{\omega }} (b^{ \max }+c^{\max }+K^{\max } )\cdot nL^{\max }>0\) and \(\kappa _{4}=\frac{\vartheta }{\overline{\omega }} (b^{\max }+c^{ \max }+K^{\max } )\cdot nh^{\max }>0\). Then we prove that the origin of error system (6) is finitetime stable with adaptive controller (8), and the settling time is obtained by
□
Remark 3.3
This paper considers that the distributed delays are unbounded, which is more difficult to verify than the bounded case. In the pervious results, the delay kernels satisfy
where \(\tau _{ij}>0\) are constants, then the CGNNs can be rewritten as a special case in this paper.
Remark 3.4
In fact, the finite time synchronization problem is very complex and difficult to calculate when there exist the discontinuity phenomenon, mixed delays, and switching controllers in the traditional neural network model. This paper overcomes these difficulties and has some innovation. By using Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 3.2, the finitetime synchronization problem can be generalized, that is, by choosing the appropriate controller, the stability time of the synchronization error system can be estimated more easily. On the other hand, the controller selected in this paper is more widely used as the estimation of stability time. It provides a theoretical basis for solving complex problems in engineering application.
4 Examples
Example 4.1
Consider the following twodimensional discontinuous CGNNs with and mixed delays:
Let \(\varpi _{1}(\pi _{1}(t))=0.5+0.1\cos (\pi _{1}(t))\), \(\varpi _{2}(\pi _{2}(t))=0.50.1\sin (\pi _{2}(t))\), \(a_{1}(\pi _{1}(t))=0.4\pi _{1}(t)\), \(a_{2}(\pi _{2}(t))=0.4\pi _{2}(t)\), \(b_{11}(t)=b_{22}(t)=0.1\), \(b_{12}(t)=b_{21}(t)=0\), \(c_{11}(t)=c_{22}(t)=0.2\), \(c_{12}(t)=c_{21}(t)=0\), \(K_{11}=K_{12}=K_{21}=K_{22}=1\), and \(I_{1}(t)=0.2\sin \sqrt{2}t+0.1\sin \sqrt{5}t\), \(I_{2}(t)=0.3 \cos \sqrt{3}t0.2\sin 2t\).
The two neuron activation functions which satisfy the two conditions (H1)–(H2) are designed as follows:
Let \(L^{\max }=h^{\max }=1\), then we consider the control rule \(u_{i}(t)=k_{1}(\pi _{i}(t)\xi (t))k_{2}\operatorname{sign}(\pi _{i}(t) \xi (t))\) with \(k_{1}=k_{2}=3.5\). It is easy to check that
which show that the assumption in Theorem 3.1 is satisfied. Figure 1 and Fig. 2(c) indicate the simulation results.
Example 4.2
Consider the following discontinuous CGNNs with mixed delays:
where the parameters have the same meanings as in equation (21).
We consider the novel adaptive controller \(u_{i}(t)=p_{i}(\pi _{i}(t)\xi (t))q_{i}\operatorname{sign}(\pi _{i}(t) \xi (t))\) with \(\dot{p}_{i}=e^{T}_{i}(t)\frac{\varrho _{i}}{\varpi _{i}(y_{i}(t))}( \pi _{i}(t)\xi _{i}(t))\), \(\dot{q}_{i}=e^{T}_{i}(t)\frac{\varrho _{i}}{\varpi _{i}(y_{i}(t))} \operatorname{sign}(\pi _{i}(t)\xi _{i}(t))\). For CGNNs (22), we can choose suitable parameters \(\theta =3\) and \(\vartheta =3\) to make the condition in Theorem 3.2 be satisfied. With given random initial state, Fig. 2(d) shows that the two state trajectories approach the zero solution, then the simulation result is presented to illustrate the obtained theoretical findings.
5 Conclusions
The finitetime synchronization problem of discontinuous CGNNs with mixed delay is studied in this brief. By using the Lyapunov functional framework, new mathematical analysis techniques, Filippov theory, and inequality techniques, a new state feedback controller and an adaptive controller are constructed to realize finitetime synchronization of complex neural networks. Compared with previous results, we overcome the problem of nonLipschitz continuity system, so how to deal with the right discontinuous system is a challenge. Finally, two numerical simulations verify the advantages of the proposed switching control method and mathematical calculation method. Future research will focus on the analysis of neural networks with time delay and the design of more effective coupling schemes between different neurons in the system.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing allows researchers to verify the results of an article, replicate the analysis, and conduct secondary analyses.
References
Cortes, J.: Discontinuous dynamical systems. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 28(3), 36–73 (2008)
Akhmet, M.: Principles of discontinuous dynamical systems. Plant Physiol. 146(3), 1064–1074 (2010)
Heemels, W., Weiland, S.: Inputtostate stability and interconnections of discontinuous dynamical systems. Automatica 44(12), 3079–3086 (2008)
Michel, A., Sun, Y., Molchanov, A.: Stability analysis of discontinuous dynamical systems determined by semigroups. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 50(9), 1277–1290 (2005)
Cao, J., Wang, Z., Sun, Y.: Synchronization in an array of linearly stochastically coupled networks with time delays. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 385(2), 718–728 (2007)
Yang, X., Cao, J., Lu, J.: Stochastic synchronization of coupled neural networks with intermittent control. Phys. Lett. A 373(36), 3259–3272 (2009)
Song, Q.: Synchronization analysis of coupled connected neural networks with mixed time delays. Neurocomputing 72(16–18), 3907–3914 (2009)
Cai, Z., Huang, L., Zhang, L.: Finitetime synchronization of masterslave neural networks with timedelays and discontinuous activations. Appl. Math. Model. 47, 208–226 (2017)
Cohen, M., Grossberg, S.: Absolute stability of global pattern formation and parallel memory storage by competitive neural networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13(5), 815–826 (1983)
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Li, M., et al.: Stability analysis for stochastic Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with mixed time delays. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 17(3), 814–820 (2006)
Wang, D., Huang, L.: Almost periodic dynamical behaviors for generalized Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with discontinuous activations via differential inclusions. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 19(10), 3857–3879 (2014)
Wang, D., Huang, L.: Periodicity and global exponential stability of generalized Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with discontinuous activations and mixed delays. Neural Netw. 51(3), 80–95 (2014)
Wang, J., Tian, L., Global, Z.Z.: Lagrange stability for Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy Cohen–Grossberg BAM neural networks with timevarying delays. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 16(4), 1603–1614 (2018)
Ravi, A., Snezhana, H., O’Regan, D., et al.: Stability analysis of Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with random impulses. Mathematics 6(9), 144–156 (2018)
Feng, J., Xu, S.: New criteria on global robust stability of Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with timevarying delays. Neurocomputing 72(1–3), 445–457 (2008)
Kong, F., Rakkiyappan, R.: Finitetime and fixedtime synchronization control of discontinuous fuzzy Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with uncertain external perturbations and mixed time delays. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 411, 105–135 (2021)
Kong, F., Zhu, Q., Sakthivel, R.: Finitetime and fixedtime synchronization control of fuzzy Cohen–Grossberg neural networks. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 394, 87–109 (2020)
Zhang, Z., Yu, S.: Global asymptotic stability for a class of complexvalued Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with time delays. Neurocomputing 171, 1158–1166 (2016)
Zhang, X., Li, C., Huang, T.: Impacts of statedependent impulses on the stability of switching Cohen–Grossberg neural networks. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017(1), 316 (2017)
Hu, J., Zeng, C.: Adaptive exponential synchronization of complexvalued Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with known and unknown parameters. Neural Netw. 86, 90–101 (2016)
Abdurahman, A., Jiang, H., Teng, Z.: Lag synchronization for Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with mixed timedelays via periodically intermittent control. Int. J. Comput. Math. 94, 275–295 (2017)
Filippov, A.: Differential Equations with Discontinuous RightHand Side. Mathematics and Its Applications (Soviet Series). Kluwer Academic, Boston (1988)
Forti, M., Nistri, P.: Global convergence of neural networks with discontinuous neuron activations. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl. 50(11), 1421–1435 (2003)
Forti, M., Nistri, P., Quincampoix, M.: Generalized neural network for nonsmooth nonlinear programming problems. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Regul. Pap. 51(9), 1741–1754 (2004)
Kong, F., Zhu, Q., Huang, T.: New fixedtime stability lemmas and applications to the discontinuous fuzzy inertial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2020.3026030
Yang, X., Wu, Z., Cao, J.: Finitetime synchronization of complex networks with nonidentical discontinuous nodes. Nonlinear Dyn. 73(4), 2313–2327 (2013)
Yang, X.: Can neural networks with arbitrary delays be finitetimely synchronized? Neurocomputing 143(16), 275–281 (2014)
Chandrasekar, A., Rakkiyappan, R., Cao, J., et al.: Synchronization of memristorbased recurrent neural networks with two delay components based on secondorder reciprocally convex approach. Neural Netw. 57, 79–93 (2014)
Jiang, C., Zhang, F., Li, T.: Synchronization and antisynchronization of Ncoupled fractionalorder complex chaotic systems with ring connection. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 47(7), 2625–2638 (2018)
Ahmed, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., et al.: Exponential synchronization via pinning adaptive control for complex networks of networks with time delays. Neurocomputing 225(C), 198–204 (2017)
Huang, X., Lam, J., Cao, J., et al.: Robust synchronization criteria for recurrent neural networks via linear feedback. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 17(8), 2723–2738 (2007)
Xiong, W., Takougang, K., Christos, V., et al.: A fractional system with five terms: analysis, circuit, chaos control and synchronization. Int. J. Electron. 106(1), 109–120 (2018)
Yang, X., Ho, D., Lu, J., et al.: Finitetime cluster synchronization of TS fuzzy complex networks with discontinuous subsystems and random coupling delays. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(6), 2302–2316 (2015)
Yang, X., Song, Q., Liang, J., et al.: Finitetime synchronization of coupled discontinuous neural networks with mixed delays and nonidentical perturbations. J. Franklin Inst. 352(10), 4382–4406 (2015)
Peng, D., Li, X., Aouiti, C., et al.: Finitetime synchronization for Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with mixed timedelays. Neurocomputing 294, 39–47 (2018)
Yang, C., Huang, L.: Finitetime synchronization of coupled timedelayed neural networks with discontinuous activations. Neurocomputing 249(8), 64–71 (2017)
Zhang, C., Wang, X., Wang, S., et al.: Finitetime synchronization for a class of fully complexvalued networks with coupling delay. IEEE Access 6, 17923–17932 (2018)
Zheng, M., Li, L., Peng, H., et al.: Finitetime stability and synchronization of memristorbased fractionalorder fuzzy cellular neural networks. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 59, 272–291 (2018)
Aubin, J., Cellina, A.: Differential Inclusions, pp. 8–13. Springer, Berlin (1984)
Hardy, G., Littlewood, J.: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, London (1988)
LaSalle, J.: The Stability of Dynamical Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia (1976)
Clarke, F.: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia (1990)
Polyakov, A.: Nonlinear feedback design for fixedtime stabilization of linear control systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57(8), 2106–2110 (2012)
Strogatz, S., Stewart, I.: Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization. Sci. Am. 269(6), 102–109 (1993)
Milanovi, V., Zaghloul, M.: Synchronization of chaotic neural networks and applications to communications. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 6(12b), 2571–2585 (1996)
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11801042) and Training Program for Excellent Young Innovators of Changsha (kq2009023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ZX and RL initiated and discussed the research problem; ZX verified the correctness of the experimental results; RL performed the experiments and took figures, analyzed the data; ZX drafted the paper. All authors have read and approved the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiang, Z., Li, R. Finitetime synchronization problem of a class of discontinuous Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with mixed delays via new switching design. Adv Differ Equ 2021, 396 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662021035422
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662021035422